Bob S. wrote:
I had forgotten that you use a WaterRower rather than a C2, but was reminded of it by Wayne's post. The principles should be pretty much the same, but I have no idea how the WR determines the work done. That said, if it does give watts, you can use that to calculate other ways of expressing the work done. Wayne provided a link to the C2 calorie calculator. That same page also lists (on the left side) some other calculator options, pace and watts, in particular. Watts is the best way of expressing the rate of putting work into the wheel - a least from the point of view of a physicist or engineer, but most forumites use pace, which is the time for 500m. Sometimes that is called split time, based on the concept of a 2k divided into 4 splits. I hope that this is helpful, but I still wonder about how much difference there is with the WR. Does that company have a website that gives any indication of what sort of performances can be expected on their machine? That might be helpful for making a comparison.
Bob S.
I'm going to see if there is a way the computer on my rower will show me all the info i've already been tracking plus watts, and if not, I'll consider tracking that instead of strokes per minute, as it seems to be more useful. Thanks again Bob for the help, I always appreciate your feedback.
shichtm wrote:I think Bob S. has some worthwhile advice; he is obviously more technically proficient than I. However, I would respectfully remind everyone the most important part is to STAY WITH IT. Personally, I don't care if I row 6 or 600 watts, but I do care that I row that day for the time I set forth for myself. Long journeys are composed of single steps. Concentrating on getting on the machine when I am supposed to is my most important thing. In the beginning... new piece of equipment, lots of enthusiasiam... three months in... not so much. STAY WITH YOUR PROGRAM.
Now to be fair, I have no idea of what a watt is. But I believe, if you spent enough honest time on the machine, honest time mind you not phoning it in but not killing yourself, everything else will take care of itself. But the most important part is putting in the time over the long haul. Knocking yourself silly in the beginning is a great way to not have longevity. Sure you want to go out and whatever, but overtraining will lead to injury and misery. If your hurt you don't exercise; if you really dread getting on the machine, you will find an excuse not to. Please, just make a committment to getting on the machine and putting in an honest effort.
I do like the calorie counter though; but not for exercise purposes. I burn around 360 calories per 30 min. I compare the calories I burned and the effort it took to burn them to whatever I am about to stuff into my face. For me, diet is the hard part. So I try and relate what I really want to what really isn't worth it. For example, I would have to row 30 minutes to burn off three sodas, and I am not really into sodas. Simple. So putting the calories into perspective is helpful to me.
And I would suggest getting gloves. The erg really messed up my hands in the beginning and it turned into a thing. I did find these neoprene wraps that work well and no more issues. [ie eliminate obstacles]
P.S. If a watt looks like a supermodel and tastes like cake I am going to cry.
Thank you, this is really what i'm trying to do overall. I do like tracking stats and numbers just to that I can see for myself that I am improving. Especially as I add more time on the rower, I like to see that I am not only going longer, but keeping the same pace I was with the shorter times. But I agree, it is a long haul for me and the most important thing is that I keep rowing.
Also, I believe the best looking watt is Naomi Watts.
Ergmeister wrote:Stay with it for sure. And be careful to not allow your intake to tick up as you are more ravenous from the work-outs. Be aware of form always. Bad form habits take only weeks to lock in and years to undo so try to consult a qualified coach to keep your form proper and in check whenever possible which will help to avoid both performance and injury problems.
On the raw hands topic, I discourage the use of gloves. Your hands will callus up and it's a rowing badge of honor. It doesn't take long for them to develop calluses and they will remind you to not mindlessly put food in your mouth.
Slow and steady will get you there.
Definitely staying with it and trying to keep good form in mind. It's difficult for me being so large to have anything resembling traditional good form. Until I can build an extension for the footboard my legs are still on the floor and my gut will be in the way of my stroke for my forseeable future, but I am doing as best as I can with form and trying to keep as close as I can to some example videos posted here.
Also, yes I'm already starting to get calluses and am currently debating whether or not to go with gloves. At first they were painful blisters, but now I've got small calluses under my middle and ring finger on both hands. I do understand how it's a badge of honor, I remember being proud when my fingertips callused when i first started playing guitar.
wphunter wrote:Had a good night on Friday! I went with a "workout of the day" 10,000 meter personal best attempt, and beat it by 1 minute 26 seconds.
To top that off, the first 2,000 meters was also a personal best by 2 seconds and the first 5,000 meters another by 11 seconds. Need less to say I was stuffed on Saturday and Sunday, but very happy for it.
Wayne
Wow great job, Wayne! That's gotta feel great! Also, I just logged some meters and we are now 72 out of 147! Officially top 50% in this challenge! Great job!
______________________________
So here is what last week looked like for me, plus this morning:
Last week I did my first time trial in a while, and just like Wayne I was able to beat my personal best. My 1000m was a full 6.2 seconds better than my last! I was SO close to being under 2 min that I was sort of kicking myself at the end of the workout. But that night I was completely exhausted, and when I ranked myself I saw that the 3.5 seconds it would have taken me to be under 2 minutes would have moved my up 50+ places in the rankings.. so I wasn't so disappointed after seeing how much more grueling it would have been to come in under 2. But that is still my next short term goal.
Also, I just did my 12 min session and made it over 2600m! My best performance to date in distance and in my split time! Also, did my weekly weigh in and i've dropped another 5lb, for a total of 52lb lost since new years! Feels good, man!
Have a great week everyone!