Page 1 of 1
Bad data in rankings
Posted: November 13th, 2018, 12:56 am
by sdr2017
Does anyone monitor the data in the concept 2 rankings? Does anyone correct errors?
I found that the average time for a 6000 M in the Mens 50-59 HWT section is anomalously high. The final entry is someone reporting a 6000M row in 32 hours! Ok, I would believe 32 min, but 32 hours is just not possible. It throws off the average time calculated by many minutes.
I would appreciate it if some official fixed the number. Is there someone I could contact, or do they watch this forum?
Thank you!
Re: Bad data in rankings
Posted: November 13th, 2018, 6:06 am
by lindsayh
sdr2017 wrote: ↑November 13th, 2018, 12:56 am
Does anyone monitor the data in the concept 2 rankings? Does anyone correct errors?I would appreciate it if some official fixed the number. Is there someone I could contact, or do they watch this forum?
they may monitor but best to contact Concept2 directly as they are responsible for maintaining the rankings
Re: Bad data in rankings
Posted: November 13th, 2018, 10:59 am
by johnlvs2run
sdr2017 wrote: ↑November 13th, 2018, 12:56 am
Is there someone I could contact, or do they watch this forum?
Send an email to
ranking@concept2.com.
Re: Bad data in rankings
Posted: November 13th, 2018, 12:33 pm
by Allan Olesen
Why even bother looking at the average?
I look at the median and the percentiles. They are much less sensitive to such problems.
Re: Bad data in rankings
Posted: November 13th, 2018, 4:35 pm
by lframari
32 hour average time for 6k. What is wrong with that?
I was feeling pretty good about my 6k time until this series of postings.
Re: Bad data in rankings
Posted: November 14th, 2018, 12:50 am
by Carl Watts
I don't look at it these days but it used to be okay and now you can filter the verified results only its way better.
The problems in the rankings are nothing compared to the problems in the challenges, the failure to move to verified rows or at least have a separate series of results for those that want all their rows verified makes it a crapshoot and not worth entering.
Re: Bad data in rankings
Posted: November 14th, 2018, 2:19 am
by sdr2017
Thank you for the suggestion. They fixed it.