Not sure where you should be posting? Put it here.
-
PaulS
- 10k Poster
- Posts: 1212
- Joined: March 16th, 2006, 12:07 pm
- Location: Washington State, USA
-
Contact:
Post
by PaulS » July 11th, 2006, 9:36 am
RyanG wrote:hello
While this may sound stupid the other night i was attempting to teach my mother how to row strangley enough she seemed to pull harder with her arms rather then push with her legs (the split was lower with fixed slide as opposed to legs only rowing)so i made her do some legs only rowing i encouraged her to push harder and well she lifted her self off the seat and fell off. it was hilarious how ever mum wasnt laughing she eneded up with a giant bruise from where she fell on the slide and hit the ground and her feet were still stuck in the foot strecher. if this was to happen on the model e im sure the consequences would be far worse with possibly a broke, fractured, sprained ankle due to the longer fall etc i know it isnt a regualr occurance but people do some times faint.
Ryan
Now those nice new graphics are going to have to be partially covered with a warning sticker....

Erg on,
Paul Smith
www.ps-sport.net Your source for Useful Rowing Accessories and Training Assistance.
"If you don't want to know the answer, don't ask me the question."
-
row4life
- 500m Poster
- Posts: 91
- Joined: March 21st, 2006, 5:06 pm
Post
by row4life » July 11th, 2006, 10:33 am
Chad Williams wrote:Will the E be used at WiRC 2007?
Can't you read S-F-B's? What did Bill write??
-
Chad Williams
- 2k Poster
- Posts: 307
- Joined: March 20th, 2006, 4:22 am
Post
by Chad Williams » July 11th, 2006, 10:48 am
c2bill wrote:*races for next year will likely be run on Model D with PM4's.
I have answered my own question.
-
Exrook
- Paddler
- Posts: 6
- Joined: March 20th, 2006, 10:51 am
Post
by Exrook » July 11th, 2006, 11:07 am
Will the new Model E be compatible with slides?
-
tennstrike
- 1k Poster
- Posts: 122
- Joined: March 16th, 2006, 8:48 pm
- Location: New Jersey
Post
by tennstrike » July 11th, 2006, 5:00 pm
Chad Williams wrote:
I have answered my own question.
I have a question, for anyone who might know, but I'm addressing it to Chad. A source would be appreciated as well. The answer must be somewhere on a Concept2 web site.
Given your 1K time that I saw with splits under 1:25, it is reasonable for you to be shooting for a sub 6:03 time in November at BIRC. My question concerns British records. Is a British record the best time at a rowing event held in the U.K. or the best time by a Brit, rowed anywhere? I looked on the U.K. site for several minutes (not exhaustively) and did not find a clarification.
6'1" 192lb 60
500 1:38.7 | 1K 3:29.2 | 2K 7:16.9 | 5K 19:14.0 | 6K 23:12.3 | 10K 39:40.5 | Started rowing June05
-
Chad Williams
- 2k Poster
- Posts: 307
- Joined: March 20th, 2006, 4:22 am
Post
by Chad Williams » July 12th, 2006, 7:35 am
tennstrike wrote:Given your 1K time that I saw with splits under 1:25, it is reasonable for you to be shooting for a sub 6:03 time in November at BIRC. My question concerns British records. Is a British record the best time at a rowing event held in the U.K. or the best time by a Brit, rowed anywhere?
As I understand it, to qualify for a British Record that person has to be a British citizen.
The only record a person from overseas could get at BiRC is a Championship Record or some kind of All Comers’ Record.
To answer your other question, I will indeed be shooting for a time quicker than 6.03 at BiRC, I intend to make progress over the coming months not take steps backwards.

-
mpukita
- 2k Poster
- Posts: 208
- Joined: March 29th, 2006, 3:28 pm
- Location: Dublin, Ohio, USA
-
Contact:
Post
by mpukita » July 12th, 2006, 7:45 am
Exrook wrote:Will the new Model E be compatible with slides?
Good question, I'd like to know this as well!
Thanks C2!
Mark Pukita
48 / 5'7" or 1.70 m / 165 lbs. or 75 kg
1:38.3 (500m) 07NOV05// 3:35.2 (1K) 05NOV06// 07:10.7 (2K LW) 25FEB07// 20:16.0 (5K) 20OCT05// 23:54.1 (6K) 20DEC06// 7,285 (30min) 27NOV05// 41:15.7 (10K) 19NOV05// 14,058 (60min) 29NOV05
-
johnlvs2run
- Half Marathon Poster
- Posts: 4012
- Joined: March 16th, 2006, 1:13 pm
- Location: California Central Coast
-
Contact:
Post
by johnlvs2run » July 12th, 2006, 9:16 am
All you do is set the erg on the slides.
So the model E should work with them the same as the C and the D.
bikeerg 75 5'8" 155# - 18.5 - 51.9 - 568 - 1:52.7 - 8:03.8 - 20:13.1 - 14620 - 40:58.7 - 28855 - 1:23:48.0
rowerg 56-58 5'8.5" 143# - 1:39.6 - 3:35.6 - 7:24.0 - 18:57.4 - 22:49.9 - 7793 - 38:44.7 - 1:22:48.9 - 2:58:46.2
-
mpukita
- 2k Poster
- Posts: 208
- Joined: March 29th, 2006, 3:28 pm
- Location: Dublin, Ohio, USA
-
Contact:
Post
by mpukita » July 12th, 2006, 9:19 am
John Rupp wrote:All you do is set the erg on the slides.
So the model E should work with them the same as the C and the D.
Sure John, so I assume you are privy to the engneering specs on the E to know, without a doubt, that the width of the legs on the E will allow an E model to fit on the slides properly. Yes?
Mark Pukita
48 / 5'7" or 1.70 m / 165 lbs. or 75 kg
1:38.3 (500m) 07NOV05// 3:35.2 (1K) 05NOV06// 07:10.7 (2K LW) 25FEB07// 20:16.0 (5K) 20OCT05// 23:54.1 (6K) 20DEC06// 7,285 (30min) 27NOV05// 41:15.7 (10K) 19NOV05// 14,058 (60min) 29NOV05
-
tennstrike
- 1k Poster
- Posts: 122
- Joined: March 16th, 2006, 8:48 pm
- Location: New Jersey
Post
by tennstrike » July 12th, 2006, 10:20 am
Chad Williams wrote:
To answer your other question, I will indeed be shooting for a time quicker than 6.03 at BiRC,
Thanks for the answer. Makes sense. Just surprised I couldn't read that somewhere. And I'm sure you knew that the context of sub 6:03 was what is posted as the current British 2K record for 40-49 of John Dixon from Bannatynes H Club at 6:03.8 in 2002. Good luck and shoot for sub 5:58, if that is still the current world record.
6'1" 192lb 60
500 1:38.7 | 1K 3:29.2 | 2K 7:16.9 | 5K 19:14.0 | 6K 23:12.3 | 10K 39:40.5 | Started rowing June05
-
johnlvs2run
- Half Marathon Poster
- Posts: 4012
- Joined: March 16th, 2006, 1:13 pm
- Location: California Central Coast
-
Contact:
Post
by johnlvs2run » July 12th, 2006, 10:23 am
mpukita wrote:John, so I assume you are privy to the engneering specs on the E to know, without a doubt, that the width of the legs on the E will allow an E model to fit on the slides properly. Yes?
Yes, Mark, my highly developed intelligence ascertained this information from the cosmos.

bikeerg 75 5'8" 155# - 18.5 - 51.9 - 568 - 1:52.7 - 8:03.8 - 20:13.1 - 14620 - 40:58.7 - 28855 - 1:23:48.0
rowerg 56-58 5'8.5" 143# - 1:39.6 - 3:35.6 - 7:24.0 - 18:57.4 - 22:49.9 - 7793 - 38:44.7 - 1:22:48.9 - 2:58:46.2
-
Francois
- 1k Poster
- Posts: 156
- Joined: March 18th, 2006, 12:19 pm
- Location: Ottawa, Canada
Post
by Francois » July 12th, 2006, 10:31 am
mpukita wrote:Exrook wrote:Will the new Model E be compatible with slides?
Good question, I'd like to know this as well!
Thanks C2!
Hi Mark,
From the picture posted on page 2 by c2Bill, the width of the feet seems to be identical (about 2 inches) for both models, so it shouldn't be a problem with the slides.
BTW, I got mine and love them. You were right that they make your legs work harder. Unfortunately, and unlike JR, I am not any faster on them!
Cheers!
Francois
49, 5'10.5" (1.79m), 153 lbs (69.5 kg)
1k 3:19.6 | 2k 6:42.8 | 5k 17:33.8 | 10K 36:43.0 | 30' 8,172m | 60' 16,031m
-
predator7906
- Paddler
- Posts: 5
- Joined: July 6th, 2006, 1:40 pm
Post
by predator7906 » July 13th, 2006, 1:42 pm
Hi again, I also would like to know if the model E will work with the slides? Thanks
-
johnlvs2run
- Half Marathon Poster
- Posts: 4012
- Joined: March 16th, 2006, 1:13 pm
- Location: California Central Coast
-
Contact:
Post
by johnlvs2run » July 13th, 2006, 3:37 pm
Yes.

bikeerg 75 5'8" 155# - 18.5 - 51.9 - 568 - 1:52.7 - 8:03.8 - 20:13.1 - 14620 - 40:58.7 - 28855 - 1:23:48.0
rowerg 56-58 5'8.5" 143# - 1:39.6 - 3:35.6 - 7:24.0 - 18:57.4 - 22:49.9 - 7793 - 38:44.7 - 1:22:48.9 - 2:58:46.2