Emotion, Cognition, Faith & Erg Scores
- johnlvs2run
- Half Marathon Poster
- Posts: 4012
- Joined: March 16th, 2006, 1:13 pm
- Location: California Central Coast
- Contact:
-
- 2k Poster
- Posts: 307
- Joined: March 20th, 2006, 4:22 am
I found out something very interesting last night that works very well for the people defending Dwayne. The information again is public and on the internet.
When I saw it I was surprised that nobody, not even Dwayne had picked up on it as a argument in his defence, so taking this into account, it makes me feel that it the information must be an error. I am going to investigate further for my own interests. Seeing as a lot of people keep saying that they “don’t care” I will only share what I find with certain people who request to know.
When I saw it I was surprised that nobody, not even Dwayne had picked up on it as a argument in his defence, so taking this into account, it makes me feel that it the information must be an error. I am going to investigate further for my own interests. Seeing as a lot of people keep saying that they “don’t care” I will only share what I find with certain people who request to know.
- hjs
- Marathon Poster
- Posts: 10076
- Joined: March 16th, 2006, 3:18 pm
- Location: Amstelveen the netherlands
Hello chad,Chad Williams wrote:I found out something very interesting last night that works very well for the people defending Dwayne. The information again is public and on the internet.
When I saw it I was surprised that nobody, not even Dwayne had picked up on it as a argument in his defence, so taking this into account, it makes me feel that it the information must be an error. I am going to investigate further for my own interests. Seeing as a lot of people keep saying that they “don’t care” I will only share what I find with certain people who request to know.
I would like know. If you do find something interesting maybe you could Pm me.
Thx henry
Do you work? Do you have a life? Oh yes, I forgot, your love affair with DA.Chad Williams wrote:I found out something very interesting last night that works very well for the people defending Dwayne. The information again is public and on the internet.
When I saw it I was surprised that nobody, not even Dwayne had picked up on it as a argument in his defence, so taking this into account, it makes me feel that it the information must be an error. I am going to investigate further for my own interests. Seeing as a lot of people keep saying that they “don’t care” I will only share what I find with certain people who request to know.
For someone who says he's not obsessed with this, you spend a alot of time looking into the events and life of DA. Little crazy, don't you think?
Well, I can't speak for anyone else, but in my case I simply am not concerned with going out looking for evidence to support or undermine either "side" in the argument. I certainly don't go trawling the Internet trying to defend anyone. It's not important enough to me to do that.Chad Williams wrote:When I saw it I was surprised that nobody, not even Dwayne had picked up on it as a argument in his defence
Since you've come by this piece of information which you say works in Dwayne's favour, will you respond by toning down your attacks, or just ignore it?
[b]Daren[/b]
37, short, borderline LWT.
[i]Taff Attack Racing[/i]
37, short, borderline LWT.
[i]Taff Attack Racing[/i]
- Citroen
- SpamTeam
- Posts: 8059
- Joined: March 16th, 2006, 3:28 pm
- Location: A small cave in deepest darkest Basingstoke, UK
That only serves to feed the nay-sayers. Post a link on the thread rather than requesting that a bunch of us fill your inbox with PMs.Chad Williams wrote:Seeing as a lot of people keep saying that they “don’t care” I will only share what I find with certain people who request to know.
I'm still an agnostic (rather than a don't care).
- johnlvs2run
- Half Marathon Poster
- Posts: 4012
- Joined: March 16th, 2006, 1:13 pm
- Location: California Central Coast
- Contact:
We don't want any fluking, flacking, flunking, flecking facts.todd wrote:the absence of facts adds to the entertainment value.

bikeerg 75 5'8" 155# - 18.5 - 51.9 - 568 - 1:52.7 - 8:03.8 - 20:13.1 - 14620 - 40:58.7 - 28855 - 1:23:48.0
rowerg 56-58 5'8.5" 143# - 1:39.6 - 3:35.6 - 7:24.0 - 18:57.4 - 22:49.9 - 7793 - 38:44.7 - 1:22:48.9 - 2:58:46.2
rowerg 56-58 5'8.5" 143# - 1:39.6 - 3:35.6 - 7:24.0 - 18:57.4 - 22:49.9 - 7793 - 38:44.7 - 1:22:48.9 - 2:58:46.2
Ah, I see what you're getting at, Chad.
RANKING RESULTS 2004
Individual and Race Results | 2000m | Men's | Heavyweight | Ages 30-39 | 2004 Season
2 Dwayne K. Adams 39 Phoenix AZ USA 2000 05:49.1 RACE
So, I guess that's an end of it, right? Or do you think it's a mis-print, or he has an inside-man at C2HQ or something?
RANKING RESULTS 2004
Individual and Race Results | 2000m | Men's | Heavyweight | Ages 30-39 | 2004 Season
2 Dwayne K. Adams 39 Phoenix AZ USA 2000 05:49.1 RACE
So, I guess that's an end of it, right? Or do you think it's a mis-print, or he has an inside-man at C2HQ or something?
[b]Daren[/b]
37, short, borderline LWT.
[i]Taff Attack Racing[/i]
37, short, borderline LWT.
[i]Taff Attack Racing[/i]
- johnlvs2run
- Half Marathon Poster
- Posts: 4012
- Joined: March 16th, 2006, 1:13 pm
- Location: California Central Coast
- Contact:
This should settle it then, Daren.
If that was indeed a race and can be verified then we will know he did that time.
Conversely if it wasn't a race and the time was faked as a race, then we know what that means too!
I'm glad this matter can be settled now.
Thank you!
If that was indeed a race and can be verified then we will know he did that time.
Conversely if it wasn't a race and the time was faked as a race, then we know what that means too!
I'm glad this matter can be settled now.
Thank you!

bikeerg 75 5'8" 155# - 18.5 - 51.9 - 568 - 1:52.7 - 8:03.8 - 20:13.1 - 14620 - 40:58.7 - 28855 - 1:23:48.0
rowerg 56-58 5'8.5" 143# - 1:39.6 - 3:35.6 - 7:24.0 - 18:57.4 - 22:49.9 - 7793 - 38:44.7 - 1:22:48.9 - 2:58:46.2
rowerg 56-58 5'8.5" 143# - 1:39.6 - 3:35.6 - 7:24.0 - 18:57.4 - 22:49.9 - 7793 - 38:44.7 - 1:22:48.9 - 2:58:46.2
Before Chad chimes in on this and repeats his same old crap...this was put in as a race, but wasn't actually. This was before C2 had the IND_V catagory. Since this was a witnessed test (by a USIRT official), Bill entered it as RACE, because that was the only way to enter it at the time as a verified test.Daren wrote:Ah, I see what you're getting at, Chad.
RANKING RESULTS 2004
Individual and Race Results | 2000m | Men's | Heavyweight | Ages 30-39 | 2004 Season
2 Dwayne K. Adams 39 Phoenix AZ USA 2000 05:49.1 RACE
So, I guess that's an end of it, right? Or do you think it's a mis-print, or he has an inside-man at C2HQ or something?
Dwayne
Row hard, row well.
[img]http://www.c2ctc.com/sigs/img1174486226.png[/img]
[img]http://www.c2ctc.com/sigs/img1174486226.png[/img]
Vaya por Dios!! No podía ser verdad!!dadams wrote: Before Chad chimes in on this and repeats his same old crap...this was put in as a race, but wasn't actually. This was before C2 had the IND_V catagory. Since this was a witnessed test (by a USIRT official), Bill entered it as RACE, because that was the only way to enter it at the time as a verified test.
Dwayne
And why can't this USIRT official come here to the forum and say: Yes, I saw DA doing this race and I can certify that the times are true. This would end this sad doubts.
52y 1.89m 98g
0.5K 1:25.1, 1K 3:15.7, 2K 6:27.9, 5K 17:22.6, 6K 20:53.6, 10K 36:55.9, 30' 8085m, 60' 15698, HM 1:20:47.2, FM 2:51:17
Lo que no nos mata nos hace más fuertes
0.5K 1:25.1, 1K 3:15.7, 2K 6:27.9, 5K 17:22.6, 6K 20:53.6, 10K 36:55.9, 30' 8085m, 60' 15698, HM 1:20:47.2, FM 2:51:17
Lo que no nos mata nos hace más fuertes