Ultimate Showdown
-
- Paddler
- Posts: 25
- Joined: March 7th, 2007, 6:01 am
-
- Paddler
- Posts: 25
- Joined: March 7th, 2007, 6:01 am
Out of curiosity, how are short legs an advantage for rowing? Don't long legs give you a longer stroke and more space to accelerate?John Rupp wrote:All the things you mention as disadvantages, I feel are great advantages for rowing.SwimmerTurnedRower wrote:I was tempted to say Michael Phelps, but he has short legs relative to his height and swimming in general doesn't require very strong legs (it is about 70% upper body, the opposite of rowing).
My pick is Michael Phelps, and swimming for the best sport as preparation for rowing.
6'4" / 193 cm, 205 lbs./ 93kg.
500- 1:22.2
2k- 6:16.9 (1:34.2)
6k- 20:52 (1:44.3)
500- 1:22.2
2k- 6:16.9 (1:34.2)
6k- 20:52 (1:44.3)
- johnlvs2run
- Half Marathon Poster
- Posts: 4012
- Joined: March 16th, 2006, 1:13 pm
- Location: California Central Coast
- Contact:
Short legs relative to his height means he has greater trunk, and definitely arm length for his height, and these are what primarily determine the length of one's stroke.
Phelps would have a huge natural stroke length for his height, plus his flexibility, all of which would give him decisive advantages.
Phelps would have a huge natural stroke length for his height, plus his flexibility, all of which would give him decisive advantages.
bikeerg 75 5'8" 155# - 18.5 - 51.9 - 568 - 1:52.7 - 8:03.8 - 20:13.1 - 14620 - 40:58.7 - 28855 - 1:23:48.0
rowerg 56-58 5'8.5" 143# - 1:39.6 - 3:35.6 - 7:24.0 - 18:57.4 - 22:49.9 - 7793 - 38:44.7 - 1:22:48.9 - 2:58:46.2
rowerg 56-58 5'8.5" 143# - 1:39.6 - 3:35.6 - 7:24.0 - 18:57.4 - 22:49.9 - 7793 - 38:44.7 - 1:22:48.9 - 2:58:46.2
I might take the swimmers. Body types are similar and both sports require upper body aerobic fitness. They are both non-weight bearing sports that take select tall-large men with high V02maxes. Given a year to train I think the swimmers might start ahead of most other sportsmen. Large elite sprint cyclists might be my next choice.