This may seem kind of stupid but,
for a legit low pull, what do you think the higest stroke rate should be?
legit stroke rate for a low pull?
legit stroke rate for a low pull?
Trinity College Rowing 2012
WSRC
WSRC
-
johnlvs2run
- Half Marathon Poster
- Posts: 4012
- Joined: March 16th, 2006, 1:13 pm
- Location: California Central Coast
- Contact:
As high as you want and that works well for you.
For my 1:24's a couple of years ago, I did 7 strokes in 50m which took about 9s and is 46-47 spm.
That was on the pm2+ though.
The pm3 measures neither 50m nor 10s, so I won't be able to do them again.
For my 1:24's a couple of years ago, I did 7 strokes in 50m which took about 9s and is 46-47 spm.
That was on the pm2+ though.
The pm3 measures neither 50m nor 10s, so I won't be able to do them again.
bikeerg 75 5'8" 155# - 18.5 - 51.9 - 568 - 1:52.7 - 8:03.8 - 20:13.1 - 14620 - 40:58.7 - 28855 - 1:23:48.0
rowerg 56-58 5'8.5" 143# - 1:39.6 - 3:35.6 - 7:24.0 - 18:57.4 - 22:49.9 - 7793 - 38:44.7 - 1:22:48.9 - 2:58:46.2
rowerg 56-58 5'8.5" 143# - 1:39.6 - 3:35.6 - 7:24.0 - 18:57.4 - 22:49.9 - 7793 - 38:44.7 - 1:22:48.9 - 2:58:46.2
-
Citroen
- SpamTeam
- Posts: 8064
- Joined: March 16th, 2006, 3:28 pm
- Location: A small cave in deepest darkest Basingstoke, UK
Re: legit stroke rate for a low pull?
There's no "legit" about it.sammac112 wrote:This may seem kind of stupid but,
for a legit low pull, what do you think the higest stroke rate should be?
We've seen folks up in the 70 strokes per minute. We had some particularly manic rowers doing the 100K LWT relay in Brighton the other weekend. There were the odd low pulls done as part of that.
But, that said, doing low pulls is a) pointless b) risky. Don't bother it's not worth it.