I am soliciting opinions to support either one of the following 2k strategies
1. find you split and stick to it for the whole piece
2. start then settle then sprint (with power 10s sprinkled somewhere in the race plan)
The reason I bring it up is I have seen both used successfully at the B's.
Thanks,
Carlos
2k stratagies
- jcastro20111
- Paddler
- Posts: 17
- Joined: February 24th, 2011, 1:02 pm
2k stratagies
---
Carlos
500m: 1:25.3 2km: 6:21.7 5km: 17:14.3 6km: 20:47.1 30min: 8578 10km: 35:38.6 1hr: 16585m HM: 1:18:40.2
Carlos
500m: 1:25.3 2km: 6:21.7 5km: 17:14.3 6km: 20:47.1 30min: 8578 10km: 35:38.6 1hr: 16585m HM: 1:18:40.2
Re: 2k stratagies
2. seems rather pointless in an erg race except for the last couple of hundred meters. It is also inefficient as far as physics is concerned.jcastro20111 wrote:I am soliciting opinions to support either one of the following 2k strategies
1. find you split and stick to it for the whole piece
2. start then settle then sprint (with power 10s sprinkled somewhere in the race plan)
The reason I bring it up is I have seen both used successfully at the B's.
Thanks,
Carlos
Bob S.
Re: 2k stratagies
1. Best strategy
2. Like an OTW race but why do it on the erg? You could try it without the power 10s.
I usually try to very slightly negative split. And I usually end up following the flat splits strategy. It feels like negative splitting, but it isn't.
S
2. Like an OTW race but why do it on the erg? You could try it without the power 10s.
I usually try to very slightly negative split. And I usually end up following the flat splits strategy. It feels like negative splitting, but it isn't.
S
Training Blog: http://blog.rowsandall.com/
Free Data and Analysis. For Rowers. By Rowers: http://rowsandall.com