I like the way you think!

Since it seems clear that I am qualified to be here....I will think about the diet you suggest!
I'm delighted to have been of service.bepah wrote:Dave,
I like the way you think!
Since it seems clear that I am qualified to be here....I will think about the diet you suggest!
Another consideration is that higher weight, whether it is muscle, fat or both, is hard on the joints, especially the ankles, knees. and hips. Even the spine develops problems. As an octogenarian, I am thankful that I have never had a serious weight problem, but I do regret all those deep squats with several hundred pounds on the bar. I would have been much better off if they had the modern leg presses back in those days.An alternative, that would have been much better for the spine, is one-legged squats with little or no weight. Not only does that take pressure off the spine, but it helps to improve balance.hjs wrote:High bmi caused by muscle is also no healthy, first to get above 30 being lean is almost impossible without using drugs and bodybuilders who do have lots of health issues and do not reach a high age on average.
Strongman or other powerathletes can have high bmi but are not very lean, for them reaching a high age being healthy is again not common. So either way, bmi being very fat or being strong and fat is never a situation our body can easily handle.
I can't agree with you.bepah wrote: I have always had a problem with the Body Mass Index. I do not believe it has any validity with respect to body form and unfairly penalizes those with more muscular masses. For example, I am 5' 10 1/2' tall and have lost over 20 pounds (from 248 to 220) since December 27th.
I was rated as obese according to the BMI chart. While I have dropped nearly 30 pounds and can erg at a sub 2:20/500 meter pace for over an hour again,...my BMI chart rates me as ........obese. BTW, I am 61 years old and had a stent put in my heart last March.
The Nutrition nurse at the VA lectured me about this ( I considered breaking her in half like a twig) but I feel that she is only spouting the dill.
Any thoughts?
bepah wrote: Thanks for all of the replies. FWIW, I have a 35 inch waist, wear a 48 jacket, and I think I could stand to lose another 10 pounts or so, but am not in a rush to do so.
While I am not a body builder, I do have these heavy legs which I think were grown from too much ice skating, cycling, and rowing. I used to ride these silly ultra rides (500-900 miles) over 2-3 days and once I became conscious, I realized that I was wasting time out in the desert riding bicycles.
So here I am, 30 years later, being lectured by a Twiggie wannabe.......I guess I will just have to resign myself to getting to be an overweighter on the BMI scale and not seeing my designated VA diabetic nutritionist...... there are worse things, you know.
Around 10% your abs would clearlyshow, if that is not the case you are certainly above 10%. If you have spots over a inch you are very likely above 15%. Only using one point is often not very accurate, better to take more, legs, back, waist, abs, chest, that will give a much more accurate view.kayakr wrote:Ok, the thread made me curious.
One more sample.
I'm an active middle aged male, 46, 6ft, 34" waist, 185lbs with some history of consistent weightlighting.
Muscle amounts would put me in the "fit" not "obvious lifter" category.
The BMI calculator puts me on the beginning of the overweight scale.
Fat pinch with clicker calipers on hip fat (16mm) says I'm ~10% bodyfat for my age.
That BF seems low to me, given that I can pinch over an inch in the thickest spots. %13 might be more correct.
Still borderline overweight isn't totally wrong.
http://livelifeactive.com/2012/02/22/un ... e-and-bmi/
From page 4 of 2009 Time Article http://www.time.com/time/magazine/artic ... -4,00.htmlbepah wrote:I am doing what I can to lose the weight I need to lose to, perhaps, end the Type 2 diabetes and reduce dependence on blood pressure meds.
as to the exercise, I am rowing from 30 minute to an hour each day for at least 6 days a week, sometimes 7, and I believe that it this that it the major cause of my weight loss.
Despite all of the talk and my basic negative attitude, I am making progress, but I cannot ever see myself going under 200 pounds, ever. My drive, actually, was to improve my health for the remainder of my time here and this discussion of the BMI was and is a diversion from my goal.
Protein is good to eat and prevents hunger. There are many great protein sources that are not meat, e.g. legumes, lentils, yogurt, milk, cottage cheese. The largest land mamals (Elephant, Hippo, Rhino) are Vegan's and get plenty of protein from plants.bepah wrote:As to diet,......I am continually challenged to follow the guidelines that are given me with the result that instead of eating and being satisfied, I remain hungry 24 hours a day. The less protein (meat) I eat, the more this phenomenon is expressed and eventually I break off and fail, dietetically, for the day.
Interesting stat's, almost identical to mine but there is a big weight differnce, I'm at 225lb with a waist at 34" in jeans depending on style as my thighs just don't fit due to the leg muscles so 35" Levi 513's fit great but my body fat is nothing like 10% (according to my scales it is 21% but I think that's BSkayakr wrote:Ok, the thread made me curious.
One more sample.
I'm an active middle aged male, 46, 6ft, 34" waist, 185lbs with some history of consistent weightlighting.
Muscle amounts would put me in the "fit" not "obvious lifter" category.
The BMI calculator puts me on the beginning of the overweight scale.
Fat pinch with clicker calipers on hip fat (16mm) says I'm ~10% bodyfat for my age.
That BF seems low to me, given that I can pinch over an inch in the thickest spots. %13 might be more correct.
Still borderline overweight isn't totally wrong.
http://livelifeactive.com/2012/02/22/un ... e-and-bmi/