6k erg test
Posted: August 4th, 2017, 9:50 am
If I pull a 2:04 for 5000m but then bring my split down to a 1:52 for the last 1000, what will my final time be? 19y old hvwt female, first 6k test. 2k PB 7:14
True, with a 148.5 2k, 6k could be expected around 156/57 ish. So why not start a bit faster?Anth_F wrote:Thats a bizarre pacing strategy for a 6k test
If you can pull a 7:14 2k, then doing a 6k with a 2:02 avg shouldn't even really be much of a test.
Her 2k PB is faster than mine. I pulled a 23:58 6k and it wasn't close to a test, it was just a regular workout @ r22.hjs wrote:True, with a 148.5 2k, 6k could be expected around 156/57 ish. So why not start a bit faster?Anth_F wrote:Thats a bizarre pacing strategy for a 6k test
If you can pull a 7:14 2k, then doing a 6k with a 2:02 avg shouldn't even really be much of a test.
Anth_F wrote:Her 2k PB is faster than mine. I pulled a 23:58 6k and it wasn't close to a test, it was just a regular workout @ r22.hjs wrote:True, with a 148.5 2k, 6k could be expected around 156/57 ish. So why not start a bit faster?Anth_F wrote:Thats a bizarre pacing strategy for a 6k test
If you can pull a 7:14 2k, then doing a 6k with a 2:02 avg shouldn't even really be much of a test.
My 2k was a proper (bloody hard) test to PB if you remember?... albeit, done in the much earlier phases of my erging journeyhjs wrote:
you are asking for it, you don,t have pb s
Only best times, your pb s should be way faster.
Don,t know how she trains, but her 5/6k could be a lot faster, no doubt.
Just kidding, don,t remember, you simply train very alround with no specific rowing goal, which is perfectly fine.Anth_F wrote:My 2k was a proper (bloody hard) test to PB if you remember?... albeit, done in the much earlier phases of my erging journeyhjs wrote:
you are asking for it, you don,t have pb s
Only best times, your pb s should be way faster.
Don,t know how she trains, but her 5/6k could be a lot faster, no doubt.![]()
Maybe after a couple more months of my current interval work plan, i will have another pop at a 2k and see where i am
You are right, Henry. I have now switched things up a bit with my training, i have implemented much more interval work to get me sharper and used to doing faster paces etc, and the pain of course. I am starting to like that feeling of digging deep which i never did like beforehjs wrote:
Just kidding, don,t remember, you simply train very alround with no specific rowing goal, which is perfectly fine.
For a sharp 2k one needs hard interval work for a while, you never done so, so you don,t have a pb.
Thats more my personal definition, it only counts if I work for it and give it a 100%.
Same for a handle down, not just finishing is enough, it needs to be paced without a slowdown, slowing down at some point is a down. But thats menot you/others
As stated earlier many times strategy should be with more or less even splits. If you are saving for 10sec/500m improvement on the last km you are not giving your best.Safris wrote:If I pull a 2:04 for 5000m but then bring my split down to a 1:52 for the last 1000, what will my final time be? 19y old hvwt female, first 6k test. 2k PB 7:14
You really want to negative split the 6K, rather than plodding for 5K then sprinting when you're tired. Your current plan won't get a 24'24" time because you're not going to make the 1:52 pace for that last 1K. You may not even be able to sustain the 2:04 pace if you're not training for endurance.kerosene wrote:As stated earlier many times strategy should be with more or less even splits. If you are saving for 10sec/500m improvement on the last km you are not giving your best.Safris wrote:If I pull a 2:04 for 5000m but then bring my split down to a 1:52 for the last 1000, what will my final time be? 19y old hvwt female, first 6k test. 2k PB 7:14
I did 7:13 2K PB last week and yesterday 19:23 5K (also PB, 1:56.2 pace). 5K was easier than the 2K but probably not really
far from my current potential.
I am generally better at short distances.
With the above in mind I would think that you should be able to push for a better time - with a good strategy.
Just based on your last 500 interval set, I believe were all in the 1:47 at R26 you could EASILY beat your previous 2K PB. You would be knocking on the <7:00 door at a free rate.Anth_F wrote:My 2k was a proper (bloody hard) test to PB if you remember?... albeit, done in the much earlier phases of my erging journeyhjs wrote:
you are asking for it, you don,t have pb s
Only best times, your pb s should be way faster.
Don,t know how she trains, but her 5/6k could be a lot faster, no doubt.![]()
Maybe after a couple more months of my current interval work plan, i will have another pop at a 2k and see where i am
Glad someone here remembers my 2k PBkini62 wrote:Just based on your last 500 interval set, I believe were all in the 1:47 at R26 you could EASILY beat your previous 2K PB. You would be knocking on the <7:00 door at a free rate.Anth_F wrote:
My 2k was a proper (bloody hard) test to PB if you remember?... albeit, done in the much earlier phases of my erging journey![]()
Maybe after a couple more months of my current interval work plan, i will have another pop at a 2k and see where i am