Question regarding interative training programme
Posted: November 24th, 2016, 7:35 pm
Hi there everyone -
First off, some data:
30 year old male, 100 kg @ 5'10". Deadlift 220 kg, squat 192 kg, bench 135 kg. Max heart rate: 187. Resting heart rate: 52
2k row PB (at beginning of October): 7:07
After doing exclusively strength training for a few years, I started doing conditioning again back in September. I primarily focused on doing interval training for the first month, doing 4x5 minute intervals with 2 minutes rest, 3 times a week, on an airdyne bike. Toward the end of September and beginning of October, I integrated some rowing intervals, and had my first 2k row test, with the result mentioned above. My rowing technique is relatively decent, considering I did crew for a couple months back in high school and it didn't take too long to review proper cues.
My question is this: I'm currently doing the 8-week fast track programme on the indoor sports website, using the training paces calculated from the main programming, and wondering - should I be focusing on maintaining my heart rate in the specified training zone, or maintaining the pace through all pieces, even if heart rate drifts above the training zone?
For example, during week 2, I performed 5x5'AT at the fastest split specific for AT training (~1:55) with 3 minutes rest between pieces. My heart rate was within AT range (160-167) for the first two pieces, but my heart drifted up gradually, and by the last piece, it was 180 at the end.
Also, should I expect linear improvements from this style of programming (as with Pete Plan), or does it function more by overcompensation near the end?
Thank you all for your collective insights.
First off, some data:
30 year old male, 100 kg @ 5'10". Deadlift 220 kg, squat 192 kg, bench 135 kg. Max heart rate: 187. Resting heart rate: 52
2k row PB (at beginning of October): 7:07
After doing exclusively strength training for a few years, I started doing conditioning again back in September. I primarily focused on doing interval training for the first month, doing 4x5 minute intervals with 2 minutes rest, 3 times a week, on an airdyne bike. Toward the end of September and beginning of October, I integrated some rowing intervals, and had my first 2k row test, with the result mentioned above. My rowing technique is relatively decent, considering I did crew for a couple months back in high school and it didn't take too long to review proper cues.
My question is this: I'm currently doing the 8-week fast track programme on the indoor sports website, using the training paces calculated from the main programming, and wondering - should I be focusing on maintaining my heart rate in the specified training zone, or maintaining the pace through all pieces, even if heart rate drifts above the training zone?
For example, during week 2, I performed 5x5'AT at the fastest split specific for AT training (~1:55) with 3 minutes rest between pieces. My heart rate was within AT range (160-167) for the first two pieces, but my heart drifted up gradually, and by the last piece, it was 180 at the end.
Also, should I expect linear improvements from this style of programming (as with Pete Plan), or does it function more by overcompensation near the end?
Thank you all for your collective insights.