That's odd because aged 41 your best HM split was around 7:30 and earlier in your late 30s you ran the 1988 Dexter-Ann Arbor Half Marathon Run at around 8:00.ranger wrote:could also run 6:00 pace for 20 miles when I was 40
Why do you lie so much?
That's odd because aged 41 your best HM split was around 7:30 and earlier in your late 30s you ran the 1988 Dexter-Ann Arbor Half Marathon Run at around 8:00.ranger wrote:could also run 6:00 pace for 20 miles when I was 40
No, I broke my ankles repeatedly playing basketball, which eventually gave me achilles tendon problems in my distance running.kini62 wrote:Same with your marathon running. Couldn't take being mediocre any longer? Again much too much competition for you.
But you were a heavyweight.ranger wrote:
In my first 2K race, when I was 52, I pulled 6:27.5, four seconds under the 50s lwt WR at the time.
Sure.macroth wrote:But you were a heavyweight.ranger wrote:
In my first 2K race, when I was 52, I pulled 6:27.5, four seconds under the 50s lwt WR at the time.
The Dexter-Ann Arbor run is in May, before the running season here even gets going.snowleopard wrote:That's odd because aged 41 your best HM split was around 7:30 and earlier in your late 30s you ran the 1988 Dexter-Ann Arbor Half Marathon Run at around 8:00.ranger wrote:could also run 6:00 pace for 20 miles when I was 40
Why do you lie so much?
And now, 9 years later, despite all of the 'stuff' that you have done that is better than anyone else which has made you 'much better than that now,' you have NEVER beaten that time.ranger wrote: So, when I was 50 years old, I took up indoor rowing.
In my first 2K race, when I was 51, I pulled 6:27.5, four seconds under the 50s lwt WR at the time.
ranger
Patience, son.Yankeerunner wrote:And now, 9 years later, despite all of the 'stuff' that you have done that is better than anyone else which has made you 'much better than that now,' you have NEVER beaten that time.ranger wrote: So, when I was 50 years old, I took up indoor rowing.
In my first 2K race, when I was 51, I pulled 6:27.5, four seconds under the 50s lwt WR at the time.
ranger
And as macroth correctly pointed out, you were a heavyweight at the time (as you also were in Baltimore the last time you broke 6:30). Just for the record.
You've gotten better? Prove it. You are a 7:00 2k erger until one of two things happen. First, you race faster than 7:00 for 2k. Second, you post a workout indicating you could do a 2k faster than 7:00. With your supposed fitness you could bang out a number of workouts any day of the week that would show 6:40 2k ability. Hell, you could just sit down and pull 6:40 without much effort just to show us that you are not a complete and utter fraud. Or the easiest way of all? Simply take a screenshot of the daily erg session as you normally do it. If it says what you claim it says, we all have to shut our mouth and acknowledge you are as good as you say. So to think you could put all of us in our place with a single click of a camera, yet you don't do it, what does that say?ranger wrote:How you get better once you are a Senior or Veteran WR-holder is another matter entirely.
So far, I am the only one to do it.
And even so, just working on my fitness, my times plateaued in 2003.
So, I have had to improve my technique in order to get better yet.
That task is complete.
Fait accompli.
I now row well (13 SPI) at low drag (119 df.).
So I am again just preparing to race.
ranger
I believe the great Ivor Biggun said it best in his opus "I'm a Wanker"ranger wrote:In a Glass of Cider
It seemed I was a mite of sediment
That waited for the bottom to ferment
So I could catch a bubble in ascent.
I rode up on one till the bubble burst
And when that left me to sink back reversed
I was no worse off than I was at first.
I'd catch another bubble if I waited.
The thing was to get now and then elated.
--Robert Frost
ranger
So where is your evidence of world class milers that are doing fast marathons in preparation for the olympics? What was your best SINGLE mile when you were running?ranger wrote:Yikes, you're _really_ naive.goblin wrote: full marathons do not prepare you, whatsoever, for flat out mile efforts. But you propose that, by training for a full marathon, and then sharpening you will pull a world record 2k.
You have absolutely no idea what you're doing.
A clown.
A lot of sprinting never made anyone good at rowing.
In rowing, the one with the best stroke wins.
Good stroking is developed at low rates over long distances, working on the effectiveness and efficiency of your technique.
Rowing is primarily skeletal-motor and technical.
It is only secondarily aerobic.
Rowing well for lightweights is 13 SPI; for heavyweights, 16 SPI.
Sure, in rowing, for lightweights like me, at least, a FM @ 22 spm is a great 2K predictor, if you are willing to train for and race a FM.
To do your best for 2K, you can't omit the rest of what needs to be done.
But really, once you know what you can do for a FM @ 22 spm, there is no more mystery.
You know exactly what you will do for 2K once you are fully prepared for it.
A FM @ 22 spm is done at 2K + 14.
ranger