Yes, indeed.mad39 wrote:why does anyone bother engaging with him....its insanity...
Why think of doing anything on your own, outside the girlish behavior of the crowd?
It is much more fun to fail repeatedly together than to succeed alone.
ranger
Yes, indeed.mad39 wrote:why does anyone bother engaging with him....its insanity...
Unfortunately some forum members were using the feature not to correct typos, but to change the content and meaning of their posts. I'm sure you would agree that that's not really in the spirit of the edit feature. Happily it's not "a short delay"; members have two hours to correct their typos, which seems more than adequate.ranger wrote:BTW, why is the edit function on the forum being disengaged after a short delay?
If posts are written quickly, as they often are, but remain permanent, as the do, it is better reading for everyone if the edit function remains engaged so that the poster can go back and correct typos, etc.
Clearly, the moderator of the forum doesn't think so.
Why?
ranger
Yes, I did.MRapp wrote:I was calling you a liar. You didn't perfectly time the two bubbles
Yes, you did.MRapp wrote:I didn't misunderstand the article you posted.
Individual races don't mean a thing, especially races early in the winter racing season.MRapp wrote:You're actually going to drive all the way to Indianapolis and HOPE you can pull a 2k all the way through without having to paddle or handle down? That's definitely a contrarian method of racing, best of luck with it.
It's not natural talent, but natural physical abilities such as strength and aerobic capacity. Same things that separate world class athletes from the rest.ranger wrote:
You must be a _very_ "natural" rower indeed if you learned to row well quickly, and with no difficulties!
I guess the rest of us don't have your natural talent for the sport.
ranger
I looked him and with only 6.1 I would bet everything I own against what you are saying about the wrestler. No doubt he will be impressive but he will not come close to any Wr on the erg. He simply is A to short and B not conditioned to erging/rowing.kini62 wrote:It's not natural talent, but natural physical abilities such as strength and aerobic capacity. Same things that separate world class athletes from the rest.ranger wrote:
You must be a _very_ "natural" rower indeed if you learned to row well quickly, and with no difficulties!
I guess the rest of us don't have your natural talent for the sport.
ranger
Go to any gym or MMA training center in the country and there will be any number of guys who may never have seen an erg that could easily pull sub 1:30 500m and some much faster than that.
I'm sure you've never heard of the UFC or it's HW champion Cain Valasquez. Former NCAA DIV 1 wrestler, gym rat. I would be willing to bet that he could give the HW 500m or 1K world record a shot if not even set it. And I doubt he has spent the last 7 years learning how to "erg".
The erg takes physical strength and aerobic capacity. Very little technique to it. But for some like you who after 7 or 10 years still has poor form maybe it is complicated.
I am not talking about the 500m or 1K.kini62 wrote: I would be willing to bet that he could give the HW 500m or 1K world record a shot
I am not talking about learning to row poorly.hjs wrote:If learning to erg should take 7 years, how many years would those sports take.
Improvement over what?hjs wrote:Also rangers learning curve is very nice, non whatsover improvement times wise