Ranger's training thread
Re: Ranger's training thread
Nice work intentionally adding a typo to my post when you quote it. What a complete jackass.
Re: Ranger's training thread
I'm no liberal, I support what is best for the populace of this nation. And that does not include less regulation on corporations, less regulation on insurance and financial companies. Cavalier environmental and corporate policies led to the recent disaster in the Gulf of Mexico - courtesy of companies like BP, Exxon and Haliburton cronying up with politicians (on both sides). Cavalier policy with respect to the financial sector has led to numerous counts of fraud, corporate irresponibilty and greed determining company policies. You can't trust people when money is the only motivation anymore. Some larger body must step in and regulate.ranger wrote:Political differences are not about intelligence and stupidity, although liberals like you (stupidly) think so.bloomp wrote:Do you really want to talk politics? Because I really don't mind derailing this thread to prove how stupid you really are.
Ad hominem arguments are no arguments at all.
They are just snobbery, or viciousness.
ranger
I find it funny how the conservative right doesn't want regulations or goverment interference at all, yet they're all too quick to enforce their beliefs on everyone. No abortion, no premarital sex, no alcohol, no gay marriage. Wait that's just religion dictating state decisions! You're not some blind follower are you Rich? You clearly have the mental capacity to think for yourself and see that.
24, 166lbs, 5'9
Re: Ranger's training thread
Yet another claim of yours proven wrong!ranger wrote:
Where free speech is not allowed, I don't see any possibilities of productive discussion.
So it goes.
I am out of here.
If you don't have the mental toughness to stay away from the forum for at least a day or two after that, there is no way you will be able to gut out a sub-6:30 2k, or a 17+k hour, or any of your other ridiculous predictions of your potential. Weak in thought and in deed.
Re: Ranger's training thread
Not true at all, Paul.bloomp wrote:I find it funny how the conservative right doesn't want regulations or goverment interference at all
Wall Street recognizes the need for regulating the types of trading that resulted in the recent financial debacle.
ranger
Last edited by ranger on June 8th, 2010, 5:49 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Rich Cureton M 72 5'11" 165 lbs. 2K pbs: 6:27.5 (hwt), 6:28 (lwt)
Re: Ranger's training thread
Clearly, the major weakness in our constitution is ethical.bloomp wrote:Wait that's just religion dictating state decisions! You're not some blind follower are you Rich?
The founding fathers assumed that life is essentially religious.
They couldn't imagine the politics of a secular society, in which it isn't.
Ironically, without an explicit role for religion in government, in our increasingly secular society, government has had to intervene (illegitimately?) and become more and more religious, rather than remaining secular.
What is "best" for the people is an ethical matter, not a political one.
Politics is about justice, not goodness.
Religion is about goodness.
What is good is often not at all just.
And what is both good and just is often not at all true (or beautiful).
Some of these problems are relevant to the problems with this forum.
The erg is a truth machine.
But social cohesion is all about justice, and for the most part, systems of justice are very large, albeit humane, lies.
Nature/Truth is red tooth and claw, an eye for an eye.
Truth doesn't have anything to do with (restorative, procedural, or distributive) justice.
Life is hard.
Then you die.
In the end, you don't get what you want or deserve.
So it goes.
The erg is a truth machine.
ranger
Last edited by ranger on June 8th, 2010, 5:59 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Rich Cureton M 72 5'11" 165 lbs. 2K pbs: 6:27.5 (hwt), 6:28 (lwt)
Re: Ranger's training thread
I assume that nature is our best teacher.
This political position isn't liberal or consevative--or even reactionary.
You might call it, uh, um, radical.
ranger
This political position isn't liberal or consevative--or even reactionary.
You might call it, uh, um, radical.
ranger
Rich Cureton M 72 5'11" 165 lbs. 2K pbs: 6:27.5 (hwt), 6:28 (lwt)
Re: Ranger's training thread
If you ever wondered over whether the root of this (and his many other) threads was mental instability, this post should provide adequate answer. Factually wrong, philosophically incoherent, psychologically suspect.ranger wrote:Clearly, the major weakness in our constitution is ethical.
The founding fathers assumed that life is essentially religious.
They couldn't imagine the politics of a secular society, in which it isn't.
Ironically, without an explicit role for religion in government, in our increasingly secular society, government has had to intervene (illegitimately?) and become more and more religious, rather than remaining secular.
What is "best" for the people is an ethical matter, not a political one.
Politics is about justice, not goodness.
Religion is about goodness.
What is good is often not at all just.
And what is both good and just is often not at all true (or beautiful).
Some of these problems are relevant to the problems with this forum.
The erg is a truth machine.
But social cohesion is all about justice, and for the most part, systems of justice are very large, albeit humane, lies.
Nature/Truth is red tooth and claw, an eye for an eye.
Truth doesn't have anything to do with (restorative, procedural, or distributive) justice.
Life is hard.
Then you die.
In the end, you don't get what you want or deserve.
So it goes.
The erg is a truth machine.
ranger
Re: Ranger's training thread
Unsupported by any facts. And you claim to read a great deal?ranger wrote: The founding fathers assumed that life is essentially religious.
They couldn't imagine the politics of a secular society, in which it isn't.
Ironically, without an explicit role for religion in government, in our increasingly secular society, government has had to intervene (illegitimately?) and become more and more religious, rather than remaining secular.
What is "best" for the people is an ethical matter, not a political one.
Politics is about justice, not goodness.
Religion is about goodness.
ranger
JD
Age: 51; H: 6"5'; W: 172 lbs;
Age: 51; H: 6"5'; W: 172 lbs;
Re: Ranger's training thread
Without even trying? You trained for a year (or 2 or 3 or 4 or whatever, depending on the particular lie) to reach 6:16, at which you failed miserably. You also failed to break -- didn't come close to -- Roy's (soft) record.ranger wrote:Already did, without even trying.
And the man (THE MAN!) who's going to go 6:16 is reduced to comparing himself to (and repeatedly posting the accumulated times of) rowers all in their sixties.This last year, no one my age and weight (or older) came within 20 seconds of my 2K.
Gobble gobble gobble.RANKING RESULTS 2010
Indoor Rower | Individual and Race Results | 2000m | Men's | Lightweight | Custom Age Range (59–70) | 2010 Season
1 Rich Cureton 59 Ann Arbor MI USA 6:41.4 RACE
2 Hugh Pite 65 Sidney BC CAN 7:02.7 RACE
3 Robert Lakin 61 Wichita KS USA 7:03.6 RACE
4 Gregory Brock 62 Santa Cruz CA USA 7:03.9 IND
5 Rolf Meek 59 Oslo NOR 7:05.4 IND
6 Jerry Lawson 62 USA 7:06.0 RACE
6 Gerald Lawson 62 Winona MN USA 7:06.0 IND
8 Leif Petersen 64 DEN 7:08.5 RACE
9 Peter Francis 61 Denver CO USA 7:09.3 RACE
10 Roger Prowse 65 GBR 7:10.3 RACE
Re: Ranger's training thread
First - the founding fathers had a perfect chance to make this nation follow one religion. They didn't because they saw where that unilateral thinking got Great Britain. They could have written into the constitution that we had to follow a sabbath on Sundays (as was the case in colonial America). They didn't, and the separation of church and state is guaranteed by the first amendment. Had church and state been one and the same, there would be no freedom of religion or any belief. The state would enforce what it wanted everyone to believe. No truth, simply mindless following. No justice, just squishing anyone's potentially different belief system. No goodness because when everyone believes the same thing, there is no reason to advance those beliefs. It would be the middle ages (or 1984) all over again.ranger wrote:Clearly, the major weakness in our constitution is ethical.bloomp wrote:Wait that's just religion dictating state decisions! You're not some blind follower are you Rich?
The founding fathers assumed that life is essentially religious.
They couldn't imagine the politics of a secular society, in which it isn't.
Ironically, without an explicit role for religion in government, in our increasingly secular society, government has had to intervene (illegitimately?) and become more and more religious, rather than remaining secular.
What is "best" for the people is an ethical matter, not a political one.
Politics is about justice, not goodness.
Religion is about goodness.
What is good is often not at all just.
And what is both good and just is often not at all true (or beautiful).
Some of these problems are relevant to the problems with this forum.
The erg is a truth machine.
But social cohesion is all about justice, and for the most part, systems of justice are very large, albeit humane, lies.
Nature/Truth is red tooth and claw, an eye for an eye.
Truth doesn't have anything to do with (restorative, procedural, or distributive) justice.
Life is hard.
Then you die.
In the end, you don't get what you want or deserve.
So it goes.
The erg is a truth machine.
ranger
Second - justice is GOOD. In the work of J.S. Mills, you hear of utilitarianism. The greatest possible good for the greatest number of people. Justice works to give the most people the most good - however it does fail in most cases. Religion is not necessarily good, e.g. crusades and fundamentalism, but it has the potential to inspire good from those who make the most of it.
Humans do not follow your 'natural' laws. That is the point of society, to provide us with a new nature. If we were below apes then the vile brutality of nature would definitely dictate how we lived, yet we are well beyond that level of understanding and have found that society provides for truth. Justice determines truth - whether you believe it or not it is what the law states as true. Even apes have a primitive concept of society where nature has much less of an impact than one would imagine - hell most herding animals have a system of protecting certain members of the group. Nature is not what you suggest it to be and the only truth from nature is that we have evolved (you do believe in evolution, correct?) to be a being capable of doing more than killing, eating and sleeping. That's what gives you the time to post here, work out 3-6 hours per day and still teach!
24, 166lbs, 5'9
Re: Ranger's training thread
Guess what when you registered you agreed to this:ranger wrote:
This is no longer an open forum.
It is gone the way of the British forum.
It is being heavily censored in order to fit a certain sort of party line.
I am out of here.
ranger
Concept2 Forum - Registration
By accessing “Concept2 Forum” (hereinafter “we”, “us”, “our”, “Concept2 Forum”, “http://www.c2forum.com”), you agree to be legally bound by the following terms. If you do not agree to be legally bound by all of the following terms then please do not access and/or use “Concept2 Forum”. We may change these at any time and we’ll do our utmost in informing you, though it would be prudent to review this regularly yourself as your continued usage of “Concept2 Forum” after changes mean you agree to be legally bound by these terms as they are updated and/or amended.
Our forums are powered by phpBB (hereinafter “they”, “them”, “their”, “phpBB software”, “www.phpbb.com”, “phpBB Group”, “phpBB Teams”) which is a bulletin board solution released under the “General Public License” (hereinafter “GPL”) and can be downloaded from http://www.phpbb.com. The phpBB software only facilitates internet based discussions, the phpBB Group are not responsible for what we allow and/or disallow as permissible content and/or conduct. For further information about phpBB, please see: http://www.phpbb.com/.
You agree not to post any abusive, obscene, vulgar, slanderous, hateful, threatening, sexually-orientated or any other material that may violate any laws be it of your country, the country where “Concept2 Forum” is hosted or International Law. Doing so may lead to you being immediately and permanently banned, with notification of your Internet Service Provider if deemed required by us. The IP address of all posts are recorded to aid in enforcing these conditions. You agree that “Concept2 Forum” have the right to remove, edit, move or close any topic at any time should we see fit. As a user you agree to any information you have entered to being stored in a database. While this information will not be disclosed to any third party without your consent, neither “Concept2 Forum” nor phpBB shall be held responsible for any hacking attempt that may lead to the data being compromised.
JD
Age: 51; H: 6"5'; W: 172 lbs;
Age: 51; H: 6"5'; W: 172 lbs;
Re: Ranger's training thread
Sure, Dougie has the power to remove my posts--at will, randomly, and for no reason.jliddel wrote:You agree that “Concept2 Forum” have the right to remove, edit, move or close any topic at any time should we see fit.
That's the law.
The law determines what is considered just in a social order.
Is it "good" that Dougie is removing my posts--at will, randomly, and for no reason?
_He_ seems to think so.
So do many others.
So it goes in this social order.
ranger
Last edited by ranger on June 9th, 2010, 3:31 am, edited 2 times in total.
Rich Cureton M 72 5'11" 165 lbs. 2K pbs: 6:27.5 (hwt), 6:28 (lwt)
Re: Ranger's training thread
As I said, I don't believe this at all.bloomp wrote:Humans do not follow your 'natural' laws. That is the point of society, to provide us with a new nature.
IMO, social evolution is just as imperious and natural as biological evolution.
We don't do it; it is done to us.
Our conception of justice at any given time is just a moment in this historical process.
Truth lies in the evolving forms of the historical process itself, and more fundamentally, in the origins of this process outside of our reach entirely--in the nature of time.
Rhythm creates time.
So, for me, rhythm is God.
We are just expressions of our temporalities.
ranger
Rich Cureton M 72 5'11" 165 lbs. 2K pbs: 6:27.5 (hwt), 6:28 (lwt)
Re: Ranger's training thread
Yes, our conception of justice at any moment is heavily realistic/pragmatic.bloomp wrote:Second - justice is GOOD. In the work of J.S. Mills, you hear of utilitarianism.
It is embedded in historical processes (physical, biological, social, cultural) and so is constantly evolving.
Justice is "applied" ethics.
Goodness is more ideal and historically stable, but not entirely so, either.
In any event, goodness logically precedes justice--and truth is more basic yet.
My question is not whether Dougie's actions are just.
My question is whether they are good.
And beyond that, whether they are true.
This seems important, given that the erg is a truth machine.
It isn't just.
ranger
Rich Cureton M 72 5'11" 165 lbs. 2K pbs: 6:27.5 (hwt), 6:28 (lwt)
Re: Ranger's training thread
Trueranger wrote: Sure, Dougie has the power to remove my posts--at will, randomly, and for no reason.
Liarranger wrote: Dougie is removing my posts--at will, randomly, and for no reason