31:52.4 7,500m 2:07.4 169 881 18
6:22.8 1,500m 2:07.6 168 879 18
6:22.3 1,500m 2:07.4 169 882 18
6:21.5 1,500m 2:07.1 170 885 18
6:22.5 1,500m 2:07.5 169 881 18
6:23.3 1,500m 2:07.7 168 877 18
Dom, what kind of Garmin benefit do you have for this ?Dom82 wrote: ↑May 12th, 2023, 10:36 amWeek 7- session 3: 8000MCode: Select all
Time Meters Pace Watts Cal/Hr S/M 40:48.5 8,000m 2:33.0 98 636 18 152 8:08.9 1,600m 2:32.7 98 637 17 141 8:11.3 1,600m 2:33.5 97 632 18 148 8:08.1 1,600m 2:32.5 99 639 19 157 8:10.7 1,600m 2:33.3 97 634 18 157 8:09.5 1,600m 2:32.9 98 636 19 161
Hi....somewhere around 75-80% of my MHR.....ideally would like to see this come down closer to 75% consistently but not fit enough atm.
Great session. Looks like you can beat your recent 2k based on that.winniewinser wrote: ↑May 23rd, 2023, 12:56 pmBPP W7S2....7x500m/2'R....anything around 1:47 (avg from 6x500m). Felt pretty controlled despite not really being too confident heading into this one. Max HR 176
12:26.5 3,500m 1:46.6 289 1293 32
Thx.....will keep plugging away for a few more weeks before maybe testing 2km before I head off on holiday to Baliiain wrote: ↑May 24th, 2023, 6:08 amGreat session. Looks like you can beat your recent 2k based on that.winniewinser wrote: ↑May 23rd, 2023, 12:56 pmBPP W7S2....7x500m/2'R....anything around 1:47 (avg from 6x500m). Felt pretty controlled despite not really being too confident heading into this one. Max HR 176
12:26.5 3,500m 1:46.6 289 1293 32
Hi, yes last column is HR. I have a simple Polar H9 chest band, so I can't help you on Garmin benefitjrkob wrote: ↑May 22nd, 2023, 4:40 amDom, what kind of Garmin benefit do you have for this ?Dom82 wrote: ↑May 12th, 2023, 10:36 amWeek 7- session 3: 8000MCode: Select all
Time Meters Pace Watts Cal/Hr S/M 40:48.5 8,000m 2:33.0 98 636 18 152 8:08.9 1,600m 2:32.7 98 637 17 141 8:11.3 1,600m 2:33.5 97 632 18 148 8:08.1 1,600m 2:32.5 99 639 19 157 8:10.7 1,600m 2:33.3 97 634 18 157 8:09.5 1,600m 2:32.9 98 636 19 161
(also I presume the last column is the HR ?)
If you're interested in getting a HR monitor then the Polar H10 is good and I pair that with my Garmin FR255 for more accurate data. It can also be paired to the erg.jrkob wrote: ↑May 22nd, 2023, 4:40 amDom, what kind of Garmin benefit do you have for this ?Dom82 wrote: ↑May 12th, 2023, 10:36 amWeek 7- session 3: 8000MCode: Select all
Time Meters Pace Watts Cal/Hr S/M 40:48.5 8,000m 2:33.0 98 636 18 152 8:08.9 1,600m 2:32.7 98 637 17 141 8:11.3 1,600m 2:33.5 97 632 18 148 8:08.1 1,600m 2:32.5 99 639 19 157 8:10.7 1,600m 2:33.3 97 634 18 157 8:09.5 1,600m 2:32.9 98 636 19 161
(also I presume the last column is the HR ?)
Pete is not a fan of HR based training and believes that UT1 is the correct level for SS. I would say anything up to 80% HRR (ie 80% max + 20% x resting HR) is fine, although the true test is whether you are fully recovered for the next hard session.winniewinser wrote: ↑May 25th, 2023, 12:58 pmBPP W7S3... another 8km but I decided to drop the pace to see how the HR reacted. Dropping from 2:07.7 to 2:09.7 saw a 10 beat drop in max HR which may also be inflated by a warm gym today. Would need to go much slower to see this under 70% MHR.
Yeah I am using it more as a barometer of fitness than anything else.....hopefully being able to increase pace while maintaining Green zone cruising (<149 for me)iain wrote: ↑May 26th, 2023, 6:20 amPete is not a fan of HR based training and believes that UT1 is the correct level for SS. I would say anything up to 80% HRR (ie 80% max + 20% x resting HR) is fine, although the true test is whether you are fully recovered for the next hard session.winniewinser wrote: ↑May 25th, 2023, 12:58 pmBPP W7S3... another 8km but I decided to drop the pace to see how the HR reacted. Dropping from 2:07.7 to 2:09.7 saw a 10 beat drop in max HR which may also be inflated by a warm gym today. Would need to go much slower to see this under 70% MHR.