Carl Watts wrote:Still alot of "I think" going on I see. Perhaps you should work on "I know I can now do".
I'm not sure what your issue with "low Rate" rowing is.
Currently 1:51.1 pace for me is 19 spm for 20 min with a final HR at AT. Obviously I would be "Better" on the Erg if I could do the same pace at 18 spm or even better at 17 spm so what's the issue with ratings below 22 spm ?
Obviously things are a little different for you as you no longer have the power per stroke so you have to "Rate up" to compensate but I wouldn't go telling everyone that there is a problem with the Wolverine Plan, because there isn't, even for a more experienced rower it is good training.
The goal for all rowers, I think, is to do quality low rate rowing at a UT2 (or perhaps low UT1) heart rate, not an AT heart rate.
Perhaps you'll get there some day, too.
You shouldn't run an AT heart rate until you are rating 26-28 spm.
I have lost my power per stroke?
Hardly.
Over the last seven years, by improving my technique (lengthening the slide, learning to lead with my legs, relaxing my shoulders at the catch, delaying my back, pulling level, learning to drive down with the front of my foot and point my toes when I swing my back, learning to get my hands away quickly at the finish, learning to control the slide on the recovery, learning to rhythmize the whole stroke cycle right on a metrical beat, etc.) and lowering the drag, I have increased my power per stroke by 2 SPI from 10.5 SPI to 12.5 SPI.
12.5 SPI is rowing (pretty darn) well for a lightweight of any age.
12.5 SPI for a little lightweight like me is like pulling 15.5 SPI for a big heavyweight like you.
15.5 SPI is 1:44 @ 20 spm.
ranger
Rich Cureton M 72 5'11" 165 lbs. 2K pbs: 6:27.5 (hwt), 6:28 (lwt)