hjs wrote: ↑November 19th, 2019, 9:14 am
Martin, maybe have a look you pb av. Numbers to get a overview. It looks after 1k, you slow down a lot, and from 2k and beyond not so much anymore. See if you can spot things you could work on.
The difference between 1 and 2k is the biggest I have ever seen....
I think that's because of my sprinter's physique, I can produce good power, and a lot of lactic acid. For short distances I can stand the high acid level (big buffer I guess), but for longer distances I have to slow down according to my limited aerobic fitness, 2k is about 80% aerobic, so 1k properly about 60%.
As yesterday's effort wasn't an all out effort I wouldn't compare 3:05 and 6:43, but 3:05 (maybe a bit faster by now) and 6:40 (OK, haven't done it, but very likely I'll do it next time), that's a difference of about 3:35.
Looking at some signatures here, I find differences of 3:40 (lance), 3:36 (Alasdair), 3:30 (Keith).
I would say Keith is very good for comparison as we both have a strength training background, by now it looks like I'm stronger for the very short distances, we're about equal at 500m and for everything longer he is much fitter, so the difference (3:30 vs. 3:35) is there, but not that big.
I always thought my biggest weakness is my 5k.
If you mean that I don't use full potential for the longer distances, I think that's true. It's very hard for me to struggle through to longer pieces, for a short time I can stand the pain much better (propably because of my strength training background with short duration and a lot of pain, but no excuse
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4faf3/4faf3cff138b7984bd1a0950d3138e560d1e0594" alt="Wink :wink:"
). I think 2ks and 5ks on a regular basis will help me working on this deficit.