Awesome Martin! I knew you weren't going to let my time stand for long and would have to challenge it - that's what is so great about having people push each other. I don't think I will test 500M again too soon but you never know. I do plan to test some other distances soon. Your pacing was solid in the middle and you didn't fade too bad, I think the faster start works for the 500M.MartinSH4321 wrote: ↑September 27th, 2019, 5:29 am500m PB - 1:21,4![]()
Impulsive decision to try 500m (before Keith decides to give them another try with rested legs).
Time Meters Pace Watts Cal/Hr S/M
1:21.4 500m 1:21.4 649 2533 39
0:15.7 100m 1:18.5 724 2790 42
0:16.3 200m 1:21.5 647 2525 37
0:16.3 300m 1:21.5 647 2525 37
0:16.4 400m 1:22.0 635 2484 40
0:16.8 500m 1:24.0 591 2332 43
The plan was to start very fast, then slowing down to 1:21,5 and hold as long as I can. Worked very good, but I think I can still go a bit faster, the drag was at 170 and at the end I wished my 205 back as my speed got weaker and weaker. Next time I'll try 180 and see how that works.
Thanks Keith for going sub 1:22 last week, this was a great motivation! I'm very curious who will get sub 1:21 first.
New Personal Best! Brag About That New Pb!
Re: New Personal Best! Brag About That New Pb!
Last edited by KeithT on September 30th, 2019, 9:08 am, edited 1 time in total.
56 yo, 6'3" 205# PBs (all since turning 50):
1 min - 376m, 500m - 1:21.3, 1K - 2:57.2, 4 min - 1305m, 2K - 6:27.8, 5K - 17:23, 30 min - 8444m, 10K - 35:54, 60 min - 16110, HM - 1:19:19, FM - 2:45:41
1 min - 376m, 500m - 1:21.3, 1K - 2:57.2, 4 min - 1305m, 2K - 6:27.8, 5K - 17:23, 30 min - 8444m, 10K - 35:54, 60 min - 16110, HM - 1:19:19, FM - 2:45:41
-
- Half Marathon Poster
- Posts: 2874
- Joined: October 10th, 2018, 6:43 am
Re: New Personal Best! Brag About That New Pb!
Re standards - I really think different here, I think to decide if a result is strong or not has to be done by comparing with others and not what an athlete can possibly do. If I'm faster/stronger... than 95/99% that's a strong result, no matter if I had to work hard/long to get there or what I potentially can do with more/better training. But it's OK to have different opinionshjs wrote: ↑September 30th, 2019, 7:57 amI don,t think my standards are high, I look at was is possible for given athlete.MartinSH4321 wrote: ↑September 30th, 2019, 7:23 am
Of course this building up will take some time, I would guess at least 3-5 years.
Looking at the rakings for 2019 (M HWT 40-49) a sub 1:17 500m would have been 4th place of 1.150, for 30-39 still 8th place of 950, both would be incredible results for me. Getting a similar ranking for longer distances is unrealistic, for 30min I would need 8.700/8.800m, so I totally agree where my genetic benefits are. Nevertheless, I like working on my aerobic capacity, and working on things I'm not already good at has a unique attraction (at least for me).
What's really good is a matter of perspective I think, your standards are very high I estimate![]()
![]()
Just out of interest: If I would focus on 500m, and as aerobic capacity is also very important for 500m, don't you think it would be reasonable to still work primarly on my aerobic capacity and then work a few months on speed and strength. I would expect to get my max strength and speed in relative short time, and having a stronger aerobic base will make the difference (like now, not much speed work for me, but good improvements at shorter distances). Or am I missing something?
Re the shorter work, ofcourse you need some aerobic conditioning, but the main driver is raw speed. There is a very strong relation between low pull / max speed and 500m. Almost always thats the weak link for non sprinter, they lack raw power.
If you would build a speedpeak on your current training, no doubt you improve some, but to really get fast, you need to build your raw strenght. So your squat, deadlift and rows. Get that up, your lowpull will go down and that will improve your short rowing.
You could, if you get the feeling, your current training begins to stall, work for a season on your strenght/speed. For now, you seem to enjoy your training, you do improve, so why change?
Only thing I see, you don,t train your short work, don,t do much strenghtraining but still do relative well on the sprint. The longer work is nice, and I do understand newbies finding 8k impressive, but relative speaking thats not on par with your sprintstuff.
Hence my advice, keep building your fitness, but don,t focus on the very long stuff. Your natural strenght is power/speed, would a waist if you kill that off for something which will never get really good nomatter what.
But, just my 2 centsabsolutely do what you yourself like to do.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4faf3/4faf3cff138b7984bd1a0950d3138e560d1e0594" alt="Wink :wink:"
As my long-term-plan is to get a good mix of strength and aerobic training there's a good chance I'll seriously work on the short distances with DL squat and rows, maybe not for a whole season, but at least for a few months. Right now, as you wrote, I enjoy the training and have great improvements, so no intention to change a lot
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d0124/d0124cea67de00af01e030201a4b2a637f1a5a19" alt="Very Happy :D"
Thanks for your advices and insights, they are always much appreciated!
1983 Austria 1.86 94Kg
LP: 1:03.4 100m: 13.3 1': 392m 500m: 1:21.4
1k: 3:05 2k: 6:43 5k: 17:53 30': 8237m 30R20: 8088m 10k: 36:39
60': 16087m, HM: 1:19:42
LP: 1:03.4 100m: 13.3 1': 392m 500m: 1:21.4
1k: 3:05 2k: 6:43 5k: 17:53 30': 8237m 30R20: 8088m 10k: 36:39
60': 16087m, HM: 1:19:42
-
- Half Marathon Poster
- Posts: 2874
- Joined: October 10th, 2018, 6:43 am
Re: New Personal Best! Brag About That New Pb!
Thanks, your sub 1:22 really pushed me!KeithT wrote: ↑September 30th, 2019, 8:56 amAwesome Martin! I knew you weren't going to let my time stand for long and would have to challenge it - that's what is so great about having people push each other. I don't think I will test 500M again too soon but you never know. I do plan to test some other distances soon. Your pacing was solid in the middle and you didn't fade too bad, I think the faster start works for the 500M.MartinSH4321 wrote: ↑September 27th, 2019, 5:29 am500m PB - 1:21,4![]()
Impulsive decision to try 500m (before Keith decides to give them another try with rested legs).
Time Meters Pace Watts Cal/Hr S/M
1:21.4 500m 1:21.4 649 2533 39
0:15.7 100m 1:18.5 724 2790 42
0:16.3 200m 1:21.5 647 2525 37
0:16.3 300m 1:21.5 647 2525 37
0:16.4 400m 1:22.0 635 2484 40
0:16.8 500m 1:24.0 591 2332 43
The plan was to start very fast, then slowing down to 1:21,5 and hold as long as I can. Worked very good, but I think I can still go a bit faster, the drag was at 170 and at the end I wished my 205 back as my speed got weaker and weaker. Next time I'll try 180 and see how that works.
Thanks Keith for going sub 1:22 last week, this was a great motivation! I'm very curious who will get sub 1:21 first.
The fast first 100 worked pretty good, next time I think I'll go even faster for the first 7-8 strokes (but I'm in no hurry, unless someone here in the forum beats my time I'll try the 1min too as they should suit me even better
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/25e03/25e03b2b634d40034aa2b33fa2c3e74fb0fcdf36" alt="Laughing :lol:"
One other thing I changed: I put my feet as high as possible, I'm more stable I think, esp. at the start.
1983 Austria 1.86 94Kg
LP: 1:03.4 100m: 13.3 1': 392m 500m: 1:21.4
1k: 3:05 2k: 6:43 5k: 17:53 30': 8237m 30R20: 8088m 10k: 36:39
60': 16087m, HM: 1:19:42
LP: 1:03.4 100m: 13.3 1': 392m 500m: 1:21.4
1k: 3:05 2k: 6:43 5k: 17:53 30': 8237m 30R20: 8088m 10k: 36:39
60': 16087m, HM: 1:19:42
Re: New Personal Best! Brag About That New Pb!
I still haven't tried changing my foot position and I have had some issue with almost coming off the seat - maybe that will help. I think we could both do better on the minute test or sure.MartinSH4321 wrote: ↑September 30th, 2019, 9:21 amThanks, your sub 1:22 really pushed me!KeithT wrote: ↑September 30th, 2019, 8:56 amAwesome Martin! I knew you weren't going to let my time stand for long and would have to challenge it - that's what is so great about having people push each other. I don't think I will test 500M again too soon but you never know. I do plan to test some other distances soon. Your pacing was solid in the middle and you didn't fade too bad, I think the faster start works for the 500M.MartinSH4321 wrote: ↑September 27th, 2019, 5:29 am500m PB - 1:21,4![]()
Impulsive decision to try 500m (before Keith decides to give them another try with rested legs).
Time Meters Pace Watts Cal/Hr S/M
1:21.4 500m 1:21.4 649 2533 39
0:15.7 100m 1:18.5 724 2790 42
0:16.3 200m 1:21.5 647 2525 37
0:16.3 300m 1:21.5 647 2525 37
0:16.4 400m 1:22.0 635 2484 40
0:16.8 500m 1:24.0 591 2332 43
The plan was to start very fast, then slowing down to 1:21,5 and hold as long as I can. Worked very good, but I think I can still go a bit faster, the drag was at 170 and at the end I wished my 205 back as my speed got weaker and weaker. Next time I'll try 180 and see how that works.
Thanks Keith for going sub 1:22 last week, this was a great motivation! I'm very curious who will get sub 1:21 first.
The fast first 100 worked pretty good, next time I think I'll go even faster for the first 7-8 strokes (but I'm in no hurry, unless someone here in the forum beats my time I'll try the 1min too as they should suit me even better).
One other thing I changed: I put my feet as high as possible, I'm more stable I think, esp. at the start.
56 yo, 6'3" 205# PBs (all since turning 50):
1 min - 376m, 500m - 1:21.3, 1K - 2:57.2, 4 min - 1305m, 2K - 6:27.8, 5K - 17:23, 30 min - 8444m, 10K - 35:54, 60 min - 16110, HM - 1:19:19, FM - 2:45:41
1 min - 376m, 500m - 1:21.3, 1K - 2:57.2, 4 min - 1305m, 2K - 6:27.8, 5K - 17:23, 30 min - 8444m, 10K - 35:54, 60 min - 16110, HM - 1:19:19, FM - 2:45:41
-
- Half Marathon Poster
- Posts: 2874
- Joined: October 10th, 2018, 6:43 am
Re: New Personal Best! Brag About That New Pb!
I had the same issue, I think because of my relative short legs and long upper body, rasing the feet helped me a lot, esp. for 100m, but for all other sprint starts too.
I think I've done too much TT lately and neglected my basic training a bit, but I think I'll try the 1min this week, goal is >380m, looking at the 500m it should be realistic.
1983 Austria 1.86 94Kg
LP: 1:03.4 100m: 13.3 1': 392m 500m: 1:21.4
1k: 3:05 2k: 6:43 5k: 17:53 30': 8237m 30R20: 8088m 10k: 36:39
60': 16087m, HM: 1:19:42
LP: 1:03.4 100m: 13.3 1': 392m 500m: 1:21.4
1k: 3:05 2k: 6:43 5k: 17:53 30': 8237m 30R20: 8088m 10k: 36:39
60': 16087m, HM: 1:19:42
Re: New Personal Best! Brag About That New Pb!
As you know I haven't tested much at all lately, that 500M was my first in a while and I haven't tested most distances for a long time (over 6 months), so starting to do some but also will not do too many close together. I agree too much of it gets you away from your training plan.MartinSH4321 wrote: ↑September 30th, 2019, 1:58 pmI had the same issue, I think because of my relative short legs and long upper body, rasing the feet helped me a lot, esp. for 100m, but for all other sprint starts too.
I think I've done too much TT lately and neglected my basic training a bit, but I think I'll try the 1min this week, goal is >380m, looking at the 500m it should be realistic.
56 yo, 6'3" 205# PBs (all since turning 50):
1 min - 376m, 500m - 1:21.3, 1K - 2:57.2, 4 min - 1305m, 2K - 6:27.8, 5K - 17:23, 30 min - 8444m, 10K - 35:54, 60 min - 16110, HM - 1:19:19, FM - 2:45:41
1 min - 376m, 500m - 1:21.3, 1K - 2:57.2, 4 min - 1305m, 2K - 6:27.8, 5K - 17:23, 30 min - 8444m, 10K - 35:54, 60 min - 16110, HM - 1:19:19, FM - 2:45:41
-
- 10k Poster
- Posts: 1482
- Joined: March 16th, 2006, 4:35 pm
- Location: Amberley Village, OH
- Contact:
Re: New Personal Best! Brag About That New Pb!
Wow that's a great time!bobtherower wrote: ↑September 28th, 2019, 4:33 amSlept poorly last night and came up with the idea of trying to improve my half marathon personal best.![]()
My aim was to stay below 2:00/500m. Last PB was 1:26:12.8 (2:02.5/500m).
Luckily, it worked out nicely, but it was some serious work and a lot of sweat![]()
![]()
Congratulations!
David
-
- Paddler
- Posts: 35
- Joined: August 19th, 2019, 4:50 am
Re: New Personal Best! Brag About That New Pb!
Thanks David data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/68f2e/68f2ecf2dc7b64c79103000d0a10f94e71406c54" alt="Smile :-)"
My legs still kinda hurtdata:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/2256a/2256a50df908f98ba263fb484c5588501654d848" alt="Embarassed :oops:"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/68f2e/68f2ecf2dc7b64c79103000d0a10f94e71406c54" alt="Smile :-)"
My legs still kinda hurt
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/2256a/2256a50df908f98ba263fb484c5588501654d848" alt="Embarassed :oops:"
34 years, 74kg, 185cm. https://www.instagram.com/martin_rowing/
- max_ratcliffe
- 10k Poster
- Posts: 1970
- Joined: May 2nd, 2019, 11:01 pm
Re: New Personal Best! Brag About That New Pb!
End of workout splurge - slightly surprised at how tough my rowing workout had been so decided to have a crack at one minute on the SkiErg.
298m, a big improvement from my previous 278m.
Classic fly and die. Touched 71s/m and 1:34 at about 15s and then got progressively slower until about 55s when the body suddenly decided it had nothing left at all. It was an interesting experience doing such a short event. No time for what Stu calls the inner chimp to start telling me to stop and it didn't even hurt.
I was sort of aware of the power decreasing like I was suffering a slow puncture. Until the sudden catastrophic burst failure at 55s
Good fun.
298m, a big improvement from my previous 278m.
Classic fly and die. Touched 71s/m and 1:34 at about 15s and then got progressively slower until about 55s when the body suddenly decided it had nothing left at all. It was an interesting experience doing such a short event. No time for what Stu calls the inner chimp to start telling me to stop and it didn't even hurt.
I was sort of aware of the power decreasing like I was suffering a slow puncture. Until the sudden catastrophic burst failure at 55s
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/25e03/25e03b2b634d40034aa2b33fa2c3e74fb0fcdf36" alt="Laughing :lol:"
Good fun.
51 HWT
PBs:
Rower 1'=329m; 500m=1:34.0; 1k=3:25:1; 2k=7:16.5; 5k=19:44; 6k=23:24; 30'=7582m; 10k=40.28; 60'=14621m; HM=1:27:46
SkiErg 1'=309m; 500m=1:40.3; 1k=3:35.3; 2k=7:35.5; 5k=20:18; 6k=24:35; 30'=7239m; 10k=42:09; 60'=14209m; HM=1:32:24
PBs:
Rower 1'=329m; 500m=1:34.0; 1k=3:25:1; 2k=7:16.5; 5k=19:44; 6k=23:24; 30'=7582m; 10k=40.28; 60'=14621m; HM=1:27:46
SkiErg 1'=309m; 500m=1:40.3; 1k=3:35.3; 2k=7:35.5; 5k=20:18; 6k=24:35; 30'=7239m; 10k=42:09; 60'=14209m; HM=1:32:24
-
- Half Marathon Poster
- Posts: 2874
- Joined: October 10th, 2018, 6:43 am
Re: New Personal Best! Brag About That New Pb!
Congrats Max!max_ratcliffe wrote: ↑October 5th, 2019, 2:41 amEnd of workout splurge - slightly surprised at how tough my rowing workout had been so decided to have a crack at one minute on the SkiErg.
298m, a big improvement from my previous 278m.
Classic fly and die. Touched 71s/m and 1:34 at about 15s and then got progressively slower until about 55s when the body suddenly decided it had nothing left at all. It was an interesting experience doing such a short event. No time for what Stu calls the inner chimp to start telling me to stop and it didn't even hurt.
I was sort of aware of the power decreasing like I was suffering a slow puncture. Until the sudden catastrophic burst failure at 55s![]()
Good fun.
Yeah, the short sprints are not such a mental challenge as it's over very fast and don't hurt very long after the effort.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d0124/d0124cea67de00af01e030201a4b2a637f1a5a19" alt="Very Happy :D"
1983 Austria 1.86 94Kg
LP: 1:03.4 100m: 13.3 1': 392m 500m: 1:21.4
1k: 3:05 2k: 6:43 5k: 17:53 30': 8237m 30R20: 8088m 10k: 36:39
60': 16087m, HM: 1:19:42
LP: 1:03.4 100m: 13.3 1': 392m 500m: 1:21.4
1k: 3:05 2k: 6:43 5k: 17:53 30': 8237m 30R20: 8088m 10k: 36:39
60': 16087m, HM: 1:19:42
-
- Half Marathon Poster
- Posts: 3921
- Joined: August 9th, 2019, 9:35 am
- Location: England
Re: New Personal Best! Brag About That New Pb!
We'll done.max_ratcliffe wrote: ↑October 5th, 2019, 2:41 amEnd of workout splurge - slightly surprised at how tough my rowing workout had been so decided to have a crack at one minute on the SkiErg.
298m, a big improvement from my previous 278m.
Classic fly and die. Touched 71s/m and 1:34 at about 15s and then got progressively slower until about 55s when the body suddenly decided it had nothing left at all. It was an interesting experience doing such a short event. No time for what Stu calls the inner chimp to start telling me to stop and it didn't even hurt.
I was sort of aware of the power decreasing like I was suffering a slow puncture. Until the sudden catastrophic burst failure at 55s![]()
Good fun.
I did my warmup on the Skierg today but no PB that's for sure.
6'2" 52yo
Alex
Recent 2k - 7:19
All time 2k - 6:50.2 (LW)
Alex
Recent 2k - 7:19
All time 2k - 6:50.2 (LW)
- hjs
- Marathon Poster
- Posts: 10076
- Joined: March 16th, 2006, 3:18 pm
- Location: Amstelveen the netherlands
Re: New Personal Best! Brag About That New Pb!
Congrats, for the skierg raw power is very important. Most very strong skiergers are “strongman” strong.max_ratcliffe wrote: ↑October 5th, 2019, 2:41 amEnd of workout splurge - slightly surprised at how tough my rowing workout had been so decided to have a crack at one minute on the SkiErg.
298m, a big improvement from my previous 278m.
Classic fly and die. Touched 71s/m and 1:34 at about 15s and then got progressively slower until about 55s when the body suddenly decided it had nothing left at all. It was an interesting experience doing such a short event. No time for what Stu calls the inner chimp to start telling me to stop and it didn't even hurt.
I was sort of aware of the power decreasing like I was suffering a slow puncture. Until the sudden catastrophic burst failure at 55s![]()
Good fun.
An example is Freddi Smulter.
https://www.instagram.com/p/B3NEFH1hIi9/
- max_ratcliffe
- 10k Poster
- Posts: 1970
- Joined: May 2nd, 2019, 11:01 pm
Re: New Personal Best! Brag About That New Pb!
Thanks Henry,hjs wrote: ↑October 5th, 2019, 9:31 amCongrats, for the skierg raw power is very important. Most very strong skiergers are “strongman” strong.max_ratcliffe wrote: ↑October 5th, 2019, 2:41 amEnd of workout splurge - slightly surprised at how tough my rowing workout had been so decided to have a crack at one minute on the SkiErg.
<>
Good fun.
An example is Freddi Smulter.
https://www.instagram.com/p/B3NEFH1hIi9/
Not the most aesthetic benching I've every seen, but that's pretty strong. Eddie Hall holds the 100m SkiErg record and he had a 500kg deadlift (and I'm sure, is fully natural...).
Cheers Martin,MartinSH4321 wrote: ↑October 5th, 2019, 4:17 amCongrats Max!max_ratcliffe wrote: ↑October 5th, 2019, 2:41 amEnd of workout splurge - slightly surprised at how tough my rowing workout had been so decided to have a crack at one minute on the SkiErg.
<>
Good fun.
Yeah, the short sprints are not such a mental challenge as it's over very fast and don't hurt very long after the effort.![]()
I really should do some row sprints just to see how bad I am! It just always seems like it'd get in the way of training. I'm not going to go to the gym for four minutes!
Thanks Alex,winniewinser wrote: ↑October 5th, 2019, 9:24 amWe'll done.max_ratcliffe wrote: ↑October 5th, 2019, 2:41 amEnd of workout splurge - slightly surprised at how tough my rowing workout had been so decided to have a crack at one minute on the SkiErg.
<>
Good fun.
I did my warmup on the Skierg today but no PB that's for sure.
I do enjoy the SkiErg for a spot of variation. I don't really enjoy it as much as the rower for longer pieces, though. I think it's because I need twice as many strokes to get anywhere. When fatigue sets in, it does seem to drag a bit. But for short pieces, it's great fun.
51 HWT
PBs:
Rower 1'=329m; 500m=1:34.0; 1k=3:25:1; 2k=7:16.5; 5k=19:44; 6k=23:24; 30'=7582m; 10k=40.28; 60'=14621m; HM=1:27:46
SkiErg 1'=309m; 500m=1:40.3; 1k=3:35.3; 2k=7:35.5; 5k=20:18; 6k=24:35; 30'=7239m; 10k=42:09; 60'=14209m; HM=1:32:24
PBs:
Rower 1'=329m; 500m=1:34.0; 1k=3:25:1; 2k=7:16.5; 5k=19:44; 6k=23:24; 30'=7582m; 10k=40.28; 60'=14621m; HM=1:27:46
SkiErg 1'=309m; 500m=1:40.3; 1k=3:35.3; 2k=7:35.5; 5k=20:18; 6k=24:35; 30'=7239m; 10k=42:09; 60'=14209m; HM=1:32:24
- hjs
- Marathon Poster
- Posts: 10076
- Joined: March 16th, 2006, 3:18 pm
- Location: Amstelveen the netherlands
Re: New Personal Best! Brag About That New Pb!
It looks Horrible
Arms are also very short, but still he pulls monster times on the skierg. And not just the short stuff, 1k and 2k are also very fast. With still lots to gain.
Eddies Younger brother skiergs seriously. Former rugby pro. Also a strong bencher, 180kg plus.
I find, in comparison with the rower, the limiting factor much more strenght. If someone wants to get better on the skierg, focus on the short stuff first mostly.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d0124/d0124cea67de00af01e030201a4b2a637f1a5a19" alt="Very Happy :D"
Eddies Younger brother skiergs seriously. Former rugby pro. Also a strong bencher, 180kg plus.
I find, in comparison with the rower, the limiting factor much more strenght. If someone wants to get better on the skierg, focus on the short stuff first mostly.
Re: New Personal Best! Brag About That New Pb!
2K 7:56.3
First time have managed sub 8 minutes, might not seem that impressive to the big boys on here but am absolutely over the moon. Very new to indoor rowing having only started 6 months ago but following the BPP really loving the sweat n pain.
Looking to complete a HM before Xmas.
First time have managed sub 8 minutes, might not seem that impressive to the big boys on here but am absolutely over the moon. Very new to indoor rowing having only started 6 months ago but following the BPP really loving the sweat n pain.
Looking to complete a HM before Xmas.
Male - 56 years - 6' / 1.83m - 100kg - PB's 2k 7:56 10k 43:11 60mins 13800m HM 1:34.37