mikvan52 wrote:All told though, I expect you will do very well because, as an athlete, you are very well trained... peaked, in fact.
Given _your_ OTW experience, training, and present goals, sure, you are concerned about your time over a head course as a whole.
I am a complete novice OTW; and this is my first race; so I'm not concerned with this at all.
OTW, I have never timed myself over any distance whatsover, even in training.
OTW, I haven't done any fast training at all--intervals by the clock, etc.
By and large, I have just been rowing easily, as I should be, working on technique.
As I said, today, my concern is just getting to the starting line, not hitting anything or losing my way, and getting to the finish line, while perhaps doing some 26 spm @ 2:05, my normal combination of rate and pace, if I get some open water.
For instance, since I don't even know how to do it, if I need to pass another boat, I just might slow down and hold my position so that I don't screw up and hurt someone else's chances for a good row.
I will also spend a good bit of time today watching where I am going.
I have never steered a boat down a course I am unfamilar with.
And I have no intention whatsoever of rowing as hard as I can!
That would be dangerous!
I suspect my HR won't be above UT2, and so 10 seconds per 500m below AT, a normal HR for a competitive 4K.
I'll wear my HR monitor so that I can check it out.
I assume that I will do _scores_ of head races before I done with my OTW rowing thirty years from now.
No reason whatsoever to try to beat the band in my first one.
I will also do just my normal three hours of training on the erg and bike before I go up to Lansing, so that I keep in the flow of my training for BIRC.
At the moment, my major goal for this year is OTErg: 6:16 at 60, not anything OTW.
My OTW goal is just to keep doing it, as one mode of cross-training for my erging, and for its future possibilities, if I continue to work on technique.
ranger
Rich Cureton M 72 5'11" 165 lbs. 2K pbs: 6:27.5 (hwt), 6:28 (lwt)