The Two Types of Training

General discussion on Training. How to get better on your erg, how to use your erg to get better at another sport, or anything else about improving your abilities.
ranger
Marathon Poster
Posts: 11629
Joined: March 27th, 2006, 3:27 pm

Re: The Two Types of Training

Post by ranger » April 19th, 2010, 2:16 pm

Ordered my new Fluidesign 1x today--in blue, with "Windhover" on the bow.

I'll drive up to London, Ontario, which isn't far at all, to pick it up.

They will have it done in four weeks.

So, May 17th?

Nice.

Thanks, mom!

:D :D

ranger
Rich Cureton M 72 5'11" 165 lbs. 2K pbs: 6:27.5 (hwt), 6:28 (lwt)

whp4
6k Poster
Posts: 665
Joined: March 15th, 2006, 10:09 pm

Re: The Two Types of Training

Post by whp4 » April 19th, 2010, 2:46 pm

snowleopard wrote:
ranger wrote:I have been on 10,000 10K runs.
No, you haven't. That would be 40,000K a week for 50 years. So, once again, you are lying.
While I agree that his claims are to be viewed with extreme skepticism, your arithmetic is rather suspect as well :)

10,000 runs * 10k / run is "only" 100,000k of running.

40,000k / week * 50 years * 52 weeks/year is 104,000,000k. The problem is your use of 40,000k as his weekly total, which is a mere 5 miles short of the circumference of the Earth (measured over the poles). I don't think even TSO claims that he ran that much per week.

What I find puzzling about his claims of endless training all his life is how he ever managed to pork up to 200 lbs. He must have spent his entire salary on potato chips and beer.

User avatar
jliddil
6k Poster
Posts: 717
Joined: February 7th, 2008, 11:44 am
Location: North Haven, CT

Re: The Two Types of Training

Post by jliddil » April 19th, 2010, 3:05 pm

whp4 wrote:
snowleopard wrote:
ranger wrote:I have been on 10,000 10K runs.

OK but 100000 Km = 62 137 mile

Divide by 30 years and you get ~2000 miles a year

Or 40 miles a week

Certainly doable but this is purely word of mouth and hearsay as is everything this person writes
JD
Age: 51; H: 6"5'; W: 172 lbs;

Bob S.
Marathon Poster
Posts: 5142
Joined: March 16th, 2006, 12:00 pm

Re: The Two Types of Training

Post by Bob S. » April 19th, 2010, 3:24 pm

jliddil wrote:
Certainly doable but this is purely word of mouth and hearsay as is everything this person writes
How about put-on or leg-pull?

User avatar
bloomp
10k Poster
Posts: 1126
Joined: November 28th, 2007, 5:37 pm
Location: Storrs, CT

Re: The Two Types of Training

Post by bloomp » April 19th, 2010, 3:37 pm

ranger wrote:
auswr wrote:'Primarily aerobic' [vs.] what?
Skeletal-muscular strength, flexibility, quickness, agility, rhythmicity, fluidity, endurance, balance, timing, etc.

ranger
Ah yes, because endurance has nothing to do with aerobic capacity?

You should really practice not sounding stupid, as Letterman might do a similar list about you.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pCnjuJ1pbmc
24, 166lbs, 5'9
Image

mrfit
2k Poster
Posts: 293
Joined: September 19th, 2009, 9:23 pm

Re: The Two Types of Training

Post by mrfit » April 19th, 2010, 3:53 pm

Wait, Primary importance: Fingers that curl. Try rowing without that. :D

whp4
6k Poster
Posts: 665
Joined: March 15th, 2006, 10:09 pm

Re: The Two Types of Training

Post by whp4 » April 19th, 2010, 4:37 pm

jliddil wrote:
whp4 wrote:
ranger wrote:I have been on 10,000 10K runs.

OK but 100000 Km = 62 137 mile

Divide by 30 years and you get ~2000 miles a year

Or 40 miles a week

Certainly doable but this is purely word of mouth and hearsay as is everything this person writes
About the only time I trust what ranger says is when he says he rows like shit, or doesn't know how to row, or isn't prepared :lol:

Certainly 10,000 10K runs over the 30 or so years he claims to have been a runner would be pushing it, given that he lived in Michigan and Illinois, not somewhere more hospitable to year-round running, like California. That's a lot of running in snow for a guy who succumbs so easily to frozen feet :lol:

snowleopard
6k Poster
Posts: 936
Joined: September 23rd, 2009, 4:16 am

Re: The Two Types of Training

Post by snowleopard » April 19th, 2010, 4:51 pm

whp4 wrote:
snowleopard wrote:
ranger wrote:I have been on 10,000 10K runs.
No, you haven't. That would be 40,000K a week for 50 years. So, once again, you are lying.
While I agree that his claims are to be viewed with extreme skepticism, your arithmetic is rather suspect as well :)

10,000 runs * 10k / run is "only" 100,000k of running.

40,000k / week * 50 years * 52 weeks/year is 104,000,000k. The problem is your use of 40,000k as his weekly total, which is a mere 5 miles short of the circumference of the Earth (measured over the poles). I don't think even TSO claims that he ran that much per week.

What I find puzzling about his claims of endless training all his life is how he ever managed to pork up to 200 lbs. He must have spent his entire salary on potato chips and beer.
Yes, sorry, my bad :oops: I was on a fly-by and not paying enough attention.

whp4
6k Poster
Posts: 665
Joined: March 15th, 2006, 10:09 pm

Re: The Two Types of Training

Post by whp4 » April 19th, 2010, 4:57 pm

bloomp wrote:
ranger wrote:
auswr wrote:'Primarily aerobic' [vs.] what?
Skeletal-muscular strength, flexibility, quickness, agility, rhythmicity, fluidity, endurance, balance, timing, etc.

ranger
Ah yes, because endurance has nothing to do with aerobic capacity?

You should really practice not sounding stupid, as Letterman might do a similar list about you.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pCnjuJ1pbmc
There'd be some serious fisticuffs in the writers' room, trying to cut the list down to only 10 items! :lol:

Striking resemblance between the "confused stare" shot in that video and a picture of Rupp! :lol:

JohnBove
1k Poster
Posts: 187
Joined: April 3rd, 2006, 3:27 pm

Re: The Two Types of Training

Post by JohnBove » April 19th, 2010, 5:42 pm

ranger wrote:
auswr wrote:Do you want to clarify that one?
I haven't lost _any_ of my youthful full-body power--at all. ranger
Well here's your claim: You rowed 6:29 or whatever in 2003 (or whatever, I'm not going to look it up). By your own description you didn't know how to row then, and you're much better now. It's axiomatic that you weren't fully trained then, since it's seven years later and you, somehow, still aren't fully trained. So, you're clearly better trained now than you were then. And you were thirteen seconds slower in your best 2K. Over 7 in another and, of course, didn't show up actually to compete against people whom you might (were you sane) consider your peers, probably because whenever you do you get whipped.

You've clearly lost lots of power (or else it's mental toughness or aerobic capacity). On the other hand, you're obviously a major head case which, as I've said before, should compel me to feel sorry for you. But I don't.

User avatar
jliddil
6k Poster
Posts: 717
Joined: February 7th, 2008, 11:44 am
Location: North Haven, CT

Re: The Two Types of Training

Post by jliddil » April 19th, 2010, 5:53 pm

He's a headcase, a total loon. And loves being an @@shole
JD
Age: 51; H: 6"5'; W: 172 lbs;

User avatar
Carl Watts
Marathon Poster
Posts: 4692
Joined: January 8th, 2010, 4:35 pm
Location: NEW ZEALAND

Re: The Two Types of Training

Post by Carl Watts » April 19th, 2010, 7:36 pm

:lol: :lol: :lol:

I just love this thread, it's so amusing I just cannot wait to read it after my row in the mornings.

Hows the distance rowing coming on Ranger ?, still waiting for your sig. to be updated, only about 10 days to go you know.

Busy updating mine with the best that I can before the 2010 season ends. Will try for a better 2K time as it's out of alighnment with the rest of my results before May 1st. Shame you don't row online, I could give you a run for your money !
Carl Watts.
Age:56 Weight: 108kg Height:183cm
Concept 2 Monitor Service Technician & indoor rower.
http://log.concept2.com/profile/863525/log

User avatar
johnlvs2run
Half Marathon Poster
Posts: 4012
Joined: March 16th, 2006, 1:13 pm
Location: California Central Coast
Contact:

Re: The Two Types of Training

Post by johnlvs2run » April 19th, 2010, 9:24 pm

ranger wrote:Ah.

Here is another thing.

Rowing is massively skeletal-muscular.

It is not primarily aerobic, as everyone likes to think.

The best thing you can do for your rowing, I think, is to learn to make maximal use your core.

You need to learn to explode with your hips in the middle of your stroke, as you swing your back, point your toes, and drive with your calves.

I did 1000 sit ups a day for five years or so in order to strengthen my core.

Pull ups are also a good measure of upper body power relative to rate. I can still do 30 pull ups.

Jumping rope is also great for the skeletal-muscular system, as is running.

I jumped rope for an hour a day for 10 years or so, just before and during when I took up rowing.

As a substitute for this hour of jumping rope, I did 10-mile runs.

For five years or so, I did the hour of jumping rope (or 10-mile run) and the hour of sit ups _before_ I did my 20K on the erg.

Hey.

No one said that being great at rowing was easy.

:D :D


ranger
MikeB did. :-)
bikeerg 75 5'8" 155# - 18.5 - 51.9 - 568 - 1:52.7 - 8:03.8 - 20:13.1 - 14620 - 40:58.7 - 28855 - 1:23:48.0
rowerg 56-58 5'8.5" 143# - 1:39.6 - 3:35.6 - 7:24.0 - 18:57.4 - 22:49.9 - 7793 - 38:44.7 - 1:22:48.9 - 2:58:46.2

User avatar
johnlvs2run
Half Marathon Poster
Posts: 4012
Joined: March 16th, 2006, 1:13 pm
Location: California Central Coast
Contact:

Re: The Two Types of Training

Post by johnlvs2run » April 19th, 2010, 9:29 pm

ranger wrote:180 bpm is AT for me.

My anaerobic threshold is 172 bpm.
I see nothing wrong with this.

In fact, I asked the following question several weeks ago, and no one was able to answer.
John Rupp wrote:
mikvan52 wrote:I'd rather gain a better understanding of how to train in and around AT than have a fake discussion about humility.
Okay then here's a question for you. At what HR is your AT not fake?
bikeerg 75 5'8" 155# - 18.5 - 51.9 - 568 - 1:52.7 - 8:03.8 - 20:13.1 - 14620 - 40:58.7 - 28855 - 1:23:48.0
rowerg 56-58 5'8.5" 143# - 1:39.6 - 3:35.6 - 7:24.0 - 18:57.4 - 22:49.9 - 7793 - 38:44.7 - 1:22:48.9 - 2:58:46.2

wgr
Paddler
Posts: 35
Joined: January 26th, 2010, 8:12 pm

Re: The Two Types of Training

Post by wgr » April 19th, 2010, 9:30 pm

Bob S. wrote:
jliddil wrote:
Certainly doable but this is purely word of mouth and hearsay as is everything this person writes
How about put-on or leg-pull?
Poetic License, pure and simple.

I'm surprised that folks who have been reading here for more than a couple of weeks insist on precisely parsing Ranger's hyperbolic boasts and taking things literally. But don't stop now -- it does make for interesting reading and keeps us coming back.

Walter

Locked