Thx mates.Dangerscouse wrote: ↑June 25th, 2025, 1:32 pmThat's a solid result Sascha, even more so given your recent issues.
Hopefully good recovery follows and it wasn't too early to push it.
Thx mates.Dangerscouse wrote: ↑June 25th, 2025, 1:32 pmThat's a solid result Sascha, even more so given your recent issues.
Code: Select all
Time Meters Pace Watts Cal/Hr S/M
10:00.0 2,594 1:55.6 226 1078 46
2:00.0 519 1:55.6 227 1079 46
4:00.0 519 1:55.6 227 1079 47
6:00.0 519 1:55.6 227 1079 47
8:00.0 519 1:55.6 227 1079 47
10:00.0 519 1:55.6 227 1079 47
It's nearly the same point of bail out, isn't it? This indicates more a mental thing for me as well, as it's very unlikely that your body always breaks down at the exact same point in a workout.Dangerscouse wrote: ↑June 27th, 2025, 6:19 am13:17.8 3,749 1:46.4 291 1299 28 153
1:00.0 294 1:42.0 329 1433 31 142
r: 1:30 48
9:00.0 2,546 1:46.0 293 1309 29 156
r: 2:00 43
3:17.8 911 1:48.5 274 1241 28 152
r91
I failed this session again, so I need to get a grip next time as it's becoming too regular for my liking. It's definitely more mental than a physical issue, so I hope that a weekend away with some great mates will help decompress, but inevitably leave me wounded for Monday.
Code: Select all
Time Meters Pace Watts Cal/Hr S/M ♥️
1:00:00 14,322 2:05.6 176 906 17 136
7:30.0 1,821 2:03.5 186 938 18 136
15:00.0 1,797 2:05.2 178 913 17 136
22:30.0 1,810 2:04.3 182 927 17 137
30:00.0 1,791 2:05.6 177 907 17 136
37:30.0 1,768 2:07.2 170 884 17 135
45:00.0 1,776 2:06.6 172 892 17 137
52:30.0 1,776 2:06.6 172 892 17 136
1:00:00 1,784 2:06.1 174 900 17 140
Think you just need to slow it down a tad Stu and just get it finished.Dangerscouse wrote: ↑June 27th, 2025, 6:19 am13:17.8 3,749 1:46.4 291 1299 28 153
1:00.0 294 1:42.0 329 1433 31 142
r: 1:30 48
9:00.0 2,546 1:46.0 293 1309 29 156
r: 2:00 43
3:17.8 911 1:48.5 274 1241 28 152
r91
I failed this session again, so I need to get a grip next time as it's becoming too regular for my liking. It's definitely more mental than a physical issue, so I hope that a weekend away with some great mates will help decompress, but inevitably leave me wounded for Monday.
+1 on this. The seven minute piece is long enough to gain some time back, with another four minutes after. A strategic negative split approach on the 9:00/7:00/4:00 would still be a good workout.nick rockliff wrote: ↑June 27th, 2025, 10:22 amThink you just need to slow it down a tad Stu and just get it finished.Dangerscouse wrote: ↑June 27th, 2025, 6:19 am13:17.8 3,749 1:46.4 291 1299 28 153
1:00.0 294 1:42.0 329 1433 31 142
r: 1:30 48
9:00.0 2,546 1:46.0 293 1309 29 156
r: 2:00 43
3:17.8 911 1:48.5 274 1241 28 152
r91
I failed this session again, so I need to get a grip next time as it's becoming too regular for my liking. It's definitely more mental than a physical issue, so I hope that a weekend away with some great mates will help decompress, but inevitably leave me wounded for Monday.
Great pacing!alex9026 wrote: ↑June 27th, 2025, 2:13 pm8:40.5 2,746 1:34.7 411 1715 32
2:55.0 922 1:34.9 409 1709 31
r: 5:00 295
2:54.1 918 1:34.8 410 1712 32
r: 5:00 223
2:51.5 906 1:34.6 413 1720 34
CTC attempt number 2. A more sensible approach with the pacing paid off on the last set. Still limped across the line, mind, so just about right I think!
This thought has never once entered my mind
Probably a sign of the effort you gave for that thing