Ranger's training thread
Re: Ranger's training thread
If you tell me why the fen
Appears impassable, I then
Will tell you why I think that I
Can get across it, if I try.
--Marianne Moore, "Progress"
Appears impassable, I then
Will tell you why I think that I
Can get across it, if I try.
--Marianne Moore, "Progress"
Rich Cureton M 72 5'11" 165 lbs. 2K pbs: 6:27.5 (hwt), 6:28 (lwt)
Re: Ranger's training thread
[removed]
Last edited by ranger on August 17th, 2010, 12:23 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Rich Cureton M 72 5'11" 165 lbs. 2K pbs: 6:27.5 (hwt), 6:28 (lwt)
Re: Ranger's training thread
Nothing, unless you yank it, just that way, a couple of thousand times a day, as I do.kini62 wrote:Seriously, what does yanking the chain 7 or 8 times prove?
ranger
Rich Cureton M 72 5'11" 165 lbs. 2K pbs: 6:27.5 (hwt), 6:28 (lwt)
Re: Ranger's training thread
To be fair that’s not the way I find it but it’s obviously a personal thing.jliddil wrote:
You claim to row OTW and erg around 20K a day if not more.
So it would seem age has had effect on your metabolism if you gain weight. And you eat a large excess of calories each day. so on one hand your power has not diminished but your metabolic rate has?
I can tell you that since the beginning of the concept2 log period (May) I have been averaging 20K a day. Look at the challenge board. All data uploaded via Rowpro. Not fast by any standard. But I am not able to maintain my weight at all. I've gone from skinny to really skinny, my sig weight says 180 I think. I am down to more like 170 now and I eat all the time.
Just another thing that does not add up.
I don’t do anything like 20K but I have averaged 10K for 6 months and currently average around 8K. In my experience it is easier to lose weight when your exercise levels are lower because your appetite is correspondingly lower. If I do say 10K @ 02:00 which burns about 740 calories my intake has to increase by more than that to feel strong the following day. Working out hard consistently with restricted calories for me leads to increasing lethargy. If I want to drop a few pounds I simply count calories for a few weeks but I would always cut right back on my erging for the duration.
I can see how somebody erging 20K a day would get heavier in the long run and I recon I would be the same.
Kevin
Age: 57 - Weight: 187 lbs - Height: 5'10"
500m 01:33.5 Jun 2010 - 2K 06:59.5 Nov 2009 - 5K 19:08.4 Jan 2011
Age: 57 - Weight: 187 lbs - Height: 5'10"
500m 01:33.5 Jun 2010 - 2K 06:59.5 Nov 2009 - 5K 19:08.4 Jan 2011
Re: Ranger's training thread
How skinny?jliddel wrote:I've gone from skinny to really skinny
To make weight, I have to be about 10% body fat.
I have about 148 lbs. of non-fat body mass.
How about you?
Only 1% of 60-year-old males have 10% body fat (or less), and I would guess that most of those can't row a lick (because they are just skinny little runts).
To row well at 10% body fat, you have to be pretty tall and pretty heavily muscled, too.
That's a trick for a 60-year-old, given what happens to the body with age.
25% of 20-year-old males have 10% body fat (or less).
I suspect that the number of 60-year-olds out there who are 10% body fat and still both tall enough (6'0"", etc.) and heavily muscled enough to row well are disappearingly few.
To be in that condition, your body needs to look like a fit, athletic 20-year-old.
ranger
Last edited by ranger on August 17th, 2010, 12:56 pm, edited 3 times in total.
Rich Cureton M 72 5'11" 165 lbs. 2K pbs: 6:27.5 (hwt), 6:28 (lwt)
Re: Ranger's training thread
So, all this training and you STILL haven't made weight? Jeez rangie, no scores on the board, not yet a lightweight, it's going to be another ugly season for you, isn't it?ranger wrote:To lose 10 pounds?hjs wrote:it will take you at least 3 months
Nah.
A month at most.
At best, three weeks.
ranger
Better get some travel insurance so that you can fake a claim for the airfare when you decide not to go to BIRC...
Rich Cureton. 7:02 at BIRC. But "much better than that now". Yeah, right.
Re: Ranger's training thread
6'5", 170 lbs., at 50 years old?jliddel wrote: I am down to more like 170 now and I eat all the time.
Yikes.
Are you strong enough to stand up?
How many pull ups can you do?
ranger
Rich Cureton M 72 5'11" 165 lbs. 2K pbs: 6:27.5 (hwt), 6:28 (lwt)
- NavigationHazard
- 10k Poster
- Posts: 1789
- Joined: March 16th, 2006, 1:11 pm
- Location: Wroclaw, Poland
Re: Ranger's training thread
Haulin' -- got my white hat on
Keep haulin -- in the cold predawn
Sprackback -- more or less supine
Just keep haulin' on
Video sessions and force-curve displays in Ann Arbor
Cincy and Indy and Elkhart I'm still a boatstopper
Your typical fraud involved in a prevarication
Handle down and see what tomorrow brings
Chicago -- got my toes froze cold
Britain -- couldn't drop the pounds
Boston -- didn't get a plane
They just won't let you win for free
Most of the guys you meet on the Forum are scullers
Most of the time I'm sittin' and thrashing at home
One of these days I know I've got to start racing
Out of the cave and into a boat of my own
Haulin', like the Forum folk
All tell me that's the way I stroke
I say your back ain't nothing but a joke
If you don't lay it down
Sometimes my force curve's pointy and high
Other times I can barely try
Lately it occurs to me
What a long strange row (with breaks) it's been .....
With apologies to Weir/Garcia et al.
Keep haulin -- in the cold predawn
Sprackback -- more or less supine
Just keep haulin' on
Video sessions and force-curve displays in Ann Arbor
Cincy and Indy and Elkhart I'm still a boatstopper
Your typical fraud involved in a prevarication
Handle down and see what tomorrow brings
Chicago -- got my toes froze cold
Britain -- couldn't drop the pounds
Boston -- didn't get a plane
They just won't let you win for free
Most of the guys you meet on the Forum are scullers
Most of the time I'm sittin' and thrashing at home
One of these days I know I've got to start racing
Out of the cave and into a boat of my own
Haulin', like the Forum folk
All tell me that's the way I stroke
I say your back ain't nothing but a joke
If you don't lay it down
Sometimes my force curve's pointy and high
Other times I can barely try
Lately it occurs to me
What a long strange row (with breaks) it's been .....
With apologies to Weir/Garcia et al.
67 MH 6' 6"
Re: Ranger's training thread
Yea, I like things like this:
http://invernessrowingclub.org.uk/perso ... alini.html
Basalini swings his back through an arc of at least 90 degrees.
Great power in the center of his stroke, coming from his core.
Yea, that's indeed how I row.
Love it.
Fiona Milne is similar:
http://invernessrowingclub.org.uk/perso ... fiona.html
Nav--
You row bolt upright like you're doing some sort of chicken walk.
No power coming from your core and back.
No swing.
All legs and arms.
BTW, you might also notice how Basalini and Milne both break their legs on their recoveries and bring them _way_ up before their hands cross their knees.
ranger
http://invernessrowingclub.org.uk/perso ... alini.html
Basalini swings his back through an arc of at least 90 degrees.
Great power in the center of his stroke, coming from his core.
Yea, that's indeed how I row.
Love it.
Fiona Milne is similar:
http://invernessrowingclub.org.uk/perso ... fiona.html
Nav--
You row bolt upright like you're doing some sort of chicken walk.
No power coming from your core and back.
No swing.
All legs and arms.
BTW, you might also notice how Basalini and Milne both break their legs on their recoveries and bring them _way_ up before their hands cross their knees.
ranger
Rich Cureton M 72 5'11" 165 lbs. 2K pbs: 6:27.5 (hwt), 6:28 (lwt)
- NavigationHazard
- 10k Poster
- Posts: 1789
- Joined: March 16th, 2006, 1:11 pm
- Location: Wroclaw, Poland
Re: Ranger's training thread
Basalini does NOT "swing his back through an arc of at least 90 degrees." Neither does Milne. Nobody does; it would be silly. Moreover you don't row like either of them.
And I do not row "bolt upright," although unlike you I actually do have great power in the middle of my stroke. It goes with the great power at the catch and at the finish.
And I do not row "bolt upright," although unlike you I actually do have great power in the middle of my stroke. It goes with the great power at the catch and at the finish.
67 MH 6' 6"
Re: Ranger's training thread
Yes, I agree.NavigationHazard wrote:Basalini does NOT "swing his back through an arc of at least 90 degrees." Neither does Milne. Nobody does; it would be silly. Moreover you don't row like either of them.
And I do not row "bolt upright," although unlike you I actually do have great power in the middle of my stroke. It goes with the great power at the catch and at the finish.
The contrast between the mechanics of your stroke and the mechanics of the strokes of Milne and Basalini is high--and telling.
Both Milne and Basalini make _huge_ use of their back and core, as all good rowers do.
ranger
Rich Cureton M 72 5'11" 165 lbs. 2K pbs: 6:27.5 (hwt), 6:28 (lwt)
- Byron Drachman
- 10k Poster
- Posts: 1124
- Joined: March 23rd, 2006, 9:26 pm
Re: Ranger's training thread
And therefore Michelle Guerette, with very little body swing, cannot be a good rower:
Re: Ranger's training thread
Actually there's lots of evidence for that yet. You've raced, by your own account, more than most indoor rowers, and have proven to be slower than you used to be every time. Now that doesn't mean that you'll continue to be slower, of course, but it is clear evidence that you are slower.ranger wrote:No evidence for that yet.macroth wrote:you've been slowing down for the last 7 years
Re: Ranger's training thread
Of course they make huge use of their back and core. They also make huge use of their legs, arms, fingers, and inner ears. All in proportion, of course, but huge nonetheless. That's entirely different, however, from traversing an arc in excess of 90 degrees, which they do not. You're putting on a display of quite staggering ignorance today, ranger - is there something wrong at home?ranger wrote:Yes, I agree.NavigationHazard wrote:Basalini does NOT "swing his back through an arc of at least 90 degrees." Neither does Milne. Nobody does; it would be silly. Moreover you don't row like either of them.
And I do not row "bolt upright," although unlike you I actually do have great power in the middle of my stroke. It goes with the great power at the catch and at the finish.
The contrast between the mechanics of your stroke and the mechanics of the strokes of Milne and Basalini is high--and telling.
Both Milne and Basalini make _huge_ use of their back and core, as all good rowers do.
ranger
Re: Ranger's training thread
Pretty close to my eye.PaulH wrote:Of course they make huge use of their back and core. They also make huge use of their legs, arms, fingers, and inner ears. All in proportion, of course, but huge nonetheless. That's entirely different, however, from traversing an arc in excess of 90 degrees, which they do not.
It's not 20 degrees. It's more.
It's not 30 degrees. It's more.
It's not 40 degrees. It's more.
It's not 50 degrees. It's more.
It's not 60 degrees. It's more.
And so forth.
What is crucial is the closing and opening of the hips and the angle of the lower, not upper, back.
At the end of his stroke, the line of Basalini's lower back is about 60 degrees past the verticql.
Milne's is just about the same.
Anatomy doesn't permit that far of a forward lean, but to me, the angle of their lower backs approach 30 degrees forward at the catch.
ranger
Rich Cureton M 72 5'11" 165 lbs. 2K pbs: 6:27.5 (hwt), 6:28 (lwt)