Ranger's training thread

General discussion on Training. How to get better on your erg, how to use your erg to get better at another sport, or anything else about improving your abilities.
ranger
Marathon Poster
Posts: 11629
Joined: March 27th, 2006, 3:27 pm

Re: Ranger's training thread

Post by ranger » August 17th, 2010, 12:20 pm

If you tell me why the fen
Appears impassable, I then
Will tell you why I think that I
Can get across it, if I try.

--Marianne Moore, "Progress"
Rich Cureton M 72 5'11" 165 lbs. 2K pbs: 6:27.5 (hwt), 6:28 (lwt)

ranger
Marathon Poster
Posts: 11629
Joined: March 27th, 2006, 3:27 pm

Re: Ranger's training thread

Post by ranger » August 17th, 2010, 12:21 pm

[removed]
Last edited by ranger on August 17th, 2010, 12:23 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Rich Cureton M 72 5'11" 165 lbs. 2K pbs: 6:27.5 (hwt), 6:28 (lwt)

ranger
Marathon Poster
Posts: 11629
Joined: March 27th, 2006, 3:27 pm

Re: Ranger's training thread

Post by ranger » August 17th, 2010, 12:23 pm

kini62 wrote:Seriously, what does yanking the chain 7 or 8 times prove?
Nothing, unless you yank it, just that way, a couple of thousand times a day, as I do.

ranger
Rich Cureton M 72 5'11" 165 lbs. 2K pbs: 6:27.5 (hwt), 6:28 (lwt)

KevJGK
2k Poster
Posts: 480
Joined: June 9th, 2009, 3:26 pm
Location: Bristol, UK

Re: Ranger's training thread

Post by KevJGK » August 17th, 2010, 12:34 pm

jliddil wrote:
You claim to row OTW and erg around 20K a day if not more.

So it would seem age has had effect on your metabolism if you gain weight. And you eat a large excess of calories each day. so on one hand your power has not diminished but your metabolic rate has?

I can tell you that since the beginning of the concept2 log period (May) I have been averaging 20K a day. Look at the challenge board. All data uploaded via Rowpro. Not fast by any standard. But I am not able to maintain my weight at all. I've gone from skinny to really skinny, my sig weight says 180 I think. I am down to more like 170 now and I eat all the time.

Just another thing that does not add up.
To be fair that’s not the way I find it but it’s obviously a personal thing.

I don’t do anything like 20K but I have averaged 10K for 6 months and currently average around 8K. In my experience it is easier to lose weight when your exercise levels are lower because your appetite is correspondingly lower. If I do say 10K @ 02:00 which burns about 740 calories my intake has to increase by more than that to feel strong the following day. Working out hard consistently with restricted calories for me leads to increasing lethargy. If I want to drop a few pounds I simply count calories for a few weeks but I would always cut right back on my erging for the duration.

I can see how somebody erging 20K a day would get heavier in the long run and I recon I would be the same.
Kevin
Age: 57 - Weight: 187 lbs - Height: 5'10"
500m 01:33.5 Jun 2010 - 2K 06:59.5 Nov 2009 - 5K 19:08.4 Jan 2011

ranger
Marathon Poster
Posts: 11629
Joined: March 27th, 2006, 3:27 pm

Re: Ranger's training thread

Post by ranger » August 17th, 2010, 12:40 pm

jliddel wrote:I've gone from skinny to really skinny
How skinny?

To make weight, I have to be about 10% body fat.

I have about 148 lbs. of non-fat body mass.

How about you?

Only 1% of 60-year-old males have 10% body fat (or less), and I would guess that most of those can't row a lick (because they are just skinny little runts).

To row well at 10% body fat, you have to be pretty tall and pretty heavily muscled, too.

That's a trick for a 60-year-old, given what happens to the body with age.

25% of 20-year-old males have 10% body fat (or less).

I suspect that the number of 60-year-olds out there who are 10% body fat and still both tall enough (6'0"", etc.) and heavily muscled enough to row well are disappearingly few.

To be in that condition, your body needs to look like a fit, athletic 20-year-old.

ranger
Last edited by ranger on August 17th, 2010, 12:56 pm, edited 3 times in total.
Rich Cureton M 72 5'11" 165 lbs. 2K pbs: 6:27.5 (hwt), 6:28 (lwt)

ausrwr
2k Poster
Posts: 288
Joined: December 18th, 2007, 9:47 pm

Re: Ranger's training thread

Post by ausrwr » August 17th, 2010, 12:47 pm

ranger wrote:
hjs wrote:it will take you at least 3 months
To lose 10 pounds?

Nah.

A month at most.

At best, three weeks.

ranger
So, all this training and you STILL haven't made weight? Jeez rangie, no scores on the board, not yet a lightweight, it's going to be another ugly season for you, isn't it?

Better get some travel insurance so that you can fake a claim for the airfare when you decide not to go to BIRC...
Rich Cureton. 7:02 at BIRC. But "much better than that now". Yeah, right.

ranger
Marathon Poster
Posts: 11629
Joined: March 27th, 2006, 3:27 pm

Re: Ranger's training thread

Post by ranger » August 17th, 2010, 1:04 pm

jliddel wrote: I am down to more like 170 now and I eat all the time.
6'5", 170 lbs., at 50 years old?

Yikes.

Are you strong enough to stand up?

How many pull ups can you do?

ranger
Rich Cureton M 72 5'11" 165 lbs. 2K pbs: 6:27.5 (hwt), 6:28 (lwt)

User avatar
NavigationHazard
10k Poster
Posts: 1789
Joined: March 16th, 2006, 1:11 pm
Location: Wroclaw, Poland

Re: Ranger's training thread

Post by NavigationHazard » August 17th, 2010, 1:07 pm

Haulin' -- got my white hat on
Keep haulin -- in the cold predawn
Sprackback -- more or less supine
Just keep haulin' on

Video sessions and force-curve displays in Ann Arbor
Cincy and Indy and Elkhart I'm still a boatstopper
Your typical fraud involved in a prevarication
Handle down and see what tomorrow brings

Chicago -- got my toes froze cold
Britain -- couldn't drop the pounds
Boston -- didn't get a plane
They just won't let you win for free

Most of the guys you meet on the Forum are scullers
Most of the time I'm sittin' and thrashing at home
One of these days I know I've got to start racing
Out of the cave and into a boat of my own

Haulin', like the Forum folk
All tell me that's the way I stroke
I say your back ain't nothing but a joke
If you don't lay it down

Sometimes my force curve's pointy and high
Other times I can barely try
Lately it occurs to me
What a long strange row (with breaks) it's been .....


With apologies to Weir/Garcia et al.
67 MH 6' 6"

ranger
Marathon Poster
Posts: 11629
Joined: March 27th, 2006, 3:27 pm

Re: Ranger's training thread

Post by ranger » August 17th, 2010, 1:35 pm

Yea, I like things like this:

http://invernessrowingclub.org.uk/perso ... alini.html

Basalini swings his back through an arc of at least 90 degrees.

Great power in the center of his stroke, coming from his core.

Yea, that's indeed how I row.

Love it.

Fiona Milne is similar:

http://invernessrowingclub.org.uk/perso ... fiona.html

Nav--

You row bolt upright like you're doing some sort of chicken walk.

No power coming from your core and back.

No swing.

All legs and arms.

BTW, you might also notice how Basalini and Milne both break their legs on their recoveries and bring them _way_ up before their hands cross their knees.

ranger
Rich Cureton M 72 5'11" 165 lbs. 2K pbs: 6:27.5 (hwt), 6:28 (lwt)

User avatar
NavigationHazard
10k Poster
Posts: 1789
Joined: March 16th, 2006, 1:11 pm
Location: Wroclaw, Poland

Re: Ranger's training thread

Post by NavigationHazard » August 17th, 2010, 1:59 pm

Basalini does NOT "swing his back through an arc of at least 90 degrees." Neither does Milne. Nobody does; it would be silly. Moreover you don't row like either of them.

And I do not row "bolt upright," although unlike you I actually do have great power in the middle of my stroke. It goes with the great power at the catch and at the finish.
67 MH 6' 6"

ranger
Marathon Poster
Posts: 11629
Joined: March 27th, 2006, 3:27 pm

Re: Ranger's training thread

Post by ranger » August 17th, 2010, 2:04 pm

NavigationHazard wrote:Basalini does NOT "swing his back through an arc of at least 90 degrees." Neither does Milne. Nobody does; it would be silly. Moreover you don't row like either of them.

And I do not row "bolt upright," although unlike you I actually do have great power in the middle of my stroke. It goes with the great power at the catch and at the finish.
Yes, I agree.

The contrast between the mechanics of your stroke and the mechanics of the strokes of Milne and Basalini is high--and telling.

Both Milne and Basalini make _huge_ use of their back and core, as all good rowers do.

ranger
Rich Cureton M 72 5'11" 165 lbs. 2K pbs: 6:27.5 (hwt), 6:28 (lwt)

User avatar
Byron Drachman
10k Poster
Posts: 1124
Joined: March 23rd, 2006, 9:26 pm

Re: Ranger's training thread

Post by Byron Drachman » August 17th, 2010, 2:10 pm

And therefore Michelle Guerette, with very little body swing, cannot be a good rower:


PaulH
6k Poster
Posts: 993
Joined: March 15th, 2006, 10:03 pm
Location: Hants, UK
Contact:

Re: Ranger's training thread

Post by PaulH » August 17th, 2010, 3:22 pm

ranger wrote:
macroth wrote:you've been slowing down for the last 7 years
No evidence for that yet.
Actually there's lots of evidence for that yet. You've raced, by your own account, more than most indoor rowers, and have proven to be slower than you used to be every time. Now that doesn't mean that you'll continue to be slower, of course, but it is clear evidence that you are slower.

PaulH
6k Poster
Posts: 993
Joined: March 15th, 2006, 10:03 pm
Location: Hants, UK
Contact:

Re: Ranger's training thread

Post by PaulH » August 17th, 2010, 3:26 pm

ranger wrote:
NavigationHazard wrote:Basalini does NOT "swing his back through an arc of at least 90 degrees." Neither does Milne. Nobody does; it would be silly. Moreover you don't row like either of them.

And I do not row "bolt upright," although unlike you I actually do have great power in the middle of my stroke. It goes with the great power at the catch and at the finish.
Yes, I agree.

The contrast between the mechanics of your stroke and the mechanics of the strokes of Milne and Basalini is high--and telling.

Both Milne and Basalini make _huge_ use of their back and core, as all good rowers do.

ranger
Of course they make huge use of their back and core. They also make huge use of their legs, arms, fingers, and inner ears. All in proportion, of course, but huge nonetheless. That's entirely different, however, from traversing an arc in excess of 90 degrees, which they do not. You're putting on a display of quite staggering ignorance today, ranger - is there something wrong at home?

ranger
Marathon Poster
Posts: 11629
Joined: March 27th, 2006, 3:27 pm

Re: Ranger's training thread

Post by ranger » August 17th, 2010, 3:31 pm

PaulH wrote:Of course they make huge use of their back and core. They also make huge use of their legs, arms, fingers, and inner ears. All in proportion, of course, but huge nonetheless. That's entirely different, however, from traversing an arc in excess of 90 degrees, which they do not.
Pretty close to my eye.

It's not 20 degrees. It's more.

It's not 30 degrees. It's more.

It's not 40 degrees. It's more.

It's not 50 degrees. It's more.

It's not 60 degrees. It's more.

And so forth.

What is crucial is the closing and opening of the hips and the angle of the lower, not upper, back.

At the end of his stroke, the line of Basalini's lower back is about 60 degrees past the verticql.

Milne's is just about the same.

Anatomy doesn't permit that far of a forward lean, but to me, the angle of their lower backs approach 30 degrees forward at the catch.

ranger
Rich Cureton M 72 5'11" 165 lbs. 2K pbs: 6:27.5 (hwt), 6:28 (lwt)

Locked