Thanks for the feedback Dangerscouse, Reuben and DJ1972.
Dangerscouse wrote: ↑April 3rd, 2025, 7:09 am
FWIW, this is my opinion. You'll necessarily hit the buffers on pace, as you'll find the limit of your current ability, so this may be about right or lower than expected due to under recovery. It's important to be honest with yourself as both of these have different solutions.
It sounds like you're going through a bit of rough patch with other life stresses, so if it is, I'd rein it in a bit, based on the fact that the last rep is open to ramping up the pace anyway. You should be able to fairly quickly figure out if it's a temporary issue and something you can fight through or not.
Dropping back on the pace on SS can quite often be a good idea, as long as you're mindful of what you're doing and not letting it become an easy way out. There's a subtle but important difference between doing what you should and what you could.
It's not entirely clear to me what you recommend for the steady state sessions. Going a bit slower or letting myself not be influenced too much by a higher heart rate and just doing the same thing I was doing, even though steady states start to feel more and more like heavy sessions?
Personally, I find it more tempting at steady states to keep aiming for a faster time, because that is more fun and challenging than maintaining the same pace as previous sessions, let alone going slower.
But as a beginner who has little to no experience with endurance sports, I don't want to force myself and risk stagnation or fatigue or injury. From what I've read, I still mainly remember that the goal is not to go as fast as possible during steady states but to gradually build up a condition base. I consider the heart rate monitor as a helpful tool to learn about my own abilities and as a monitor to keep building up patiently rather than unconsciously building up the intensity of my steady states.
reuben wrote: ↑April 3rd, 2025, 10:05 am
This happened to me when I was moving from the 8k to 10k SS rows. Up until that point I had been able to maintain the same pace for the SS rows as they increased in length, but then hit a bit of a wall. I'm retired, wasn't sick, had just the "normal" stressors, so I guess I just got to the point where my body couldn't maintain the progression, and I had to back off a bit and consolidate. So I lowered my SS pace by 1 or 2s, persevered (aka ground out the meters at whatever pace I could manage), and then came out fine a few weeks later, even lowering my pace slightly in the last week or two. I don't recall any difference in my intervals during that stretch. YMMV and all that.
Recognizable, and I followed your advice to lower my SS pace a bit.
DJ1972 wrote: ↑April 4th, 2025, 2:26 am
Welcome back! On a personal basis, I repeated the same week when I had a break and added some steady state until I felt that I could progress to the next week of plan.
For now I'm going to continue with the plan, but I did replace the day 5 session with a steady state session.
So far I don't feel like it's getting much better yet, so maybe I'll eventually repeat a week or add some random ss sessions.
Week 20.3 [30 min]:
I decided to use this session as a way to rediscover my "real" current steady state pace. So no target time, just heart rate driven, whereby I set myself a maximum heart rate of 140. The ida was that I could then use that same pace afterwards for the next longer steady states.
I ended up with a split of 2:23 and an average heart rate of 135.
Week 20.4 [10k]:
Although I felt as well rested as previous session (30 min - 2:23 - avergage heart rate 135) my heart rate went up again quite a bit (144 instead of 135) despite following the same pace of 2:23.
The reason was not that the distance of this session was longer, because my heart rate went above 140 already from minute 9 and did not drop below it afterwards, while I reached a maximum of 140 the previous session. The only positive I got out of it was that my heart rate remained more or less constant throughout the entire session and thus did not show a (sharply) rising curve towards the end.
Week 20.5 [10k]
Based on the previous session, I thought it would be more useful to do another steady state session instead of an interval session.
So I swapped the 8 x 500m with a 10k session.
By again choosing a pace of 2:23, I hoped this would show that the previous session was a negative outlier. Unfortunately, my heart rate once again reached 143, following a similar patern as the other 10k session.
So for now it looks like I will have to keep this pace for a bit, or maybe even go a little slower for the ss sessions.
The last session of week 20 remaining is interval session 20.2 [5 x 1,500k]. Although the stars are not favorable I will make the best of it and try to achieve at least the same target as that of session 16.2. Based on the result of that session I can evaluate where I'm at for the interval sessions and how I can follow up for the next sessions.