Why is that interesting? Xeno is a hwt, a powerful athlete and a stylish sculler.ranger wrote:Interestingly, in his Olympic years, Xeno liked to do most of his meters in his 1x at 21 spm.
You scull like a lobster.
I don't see any connection.
Why is that interesting? Xeno is a hwt, a powerful athlete and a stylish sculler.ranger wrote:Interestingly, in his Olympic years, Xeno liked to do most of his meters in his 1x at 21 spm.
Liar.ranger wrote:
This morning so far, 15K OTErg, 1:48 @ 21 spm (13 SPI).
Sure.snowleopard wrote:Why is that interesting? Xeno is a hwt, a powerful athlete and a stylish sculler.ranger wrote:Interestingly, in his Olympic years, Xeno liked to do most of his meters in his 1x at 21 spm.
You scull like a lobster.
I don't see any connection.
ranger,ranger wrote:This morning so far, 15K OTErg, 1:48 @ 21 spm (13 SPI).
Sure.snowleopard wrote:ranger,ranger wrote:This morning so far, 15K OTErg, 1:48 @ 21 spm (13 SPI).
This is awesome stuff.
I can't understand why you aren't ranking these 60+ lwt rows. Just get an IND_V tag and you can instantly have top spot at all distances. And that's rowing at just 21 spm. Amazing
To join in with everyone else: No you didn't. This is an outright lie. You've said repeatedly that this is a thread for discussing training. Lying about it is the absolute antithesis of discussion. Hence you have 4 hours to admit to and apologize for your lie, or prove that it wasn't a lie. If you choose not to do one of those I'm closing the thread.ranger wrote: This morning so far, 15K OTErg, 1:48 @ 21 spm (13 SPI).
Now you are talking Paul. If he does this, (show proof that is) not an apology, I will down on my knees and post that as a picture.PaulH wrote:To join in with everyone else: No you didn't. This is an outright lie. You've said repeatedly that this is a thread for discussing training. Lying about it is the absolute antithesis of discussion. Hence you have 4 hours to admit to and apologize for your lie, or prove that it wasn't a lie. If you choose not to do one of those I'm closing the thread.ranger wrote: This morning so far, 15K OTErg, 1:48 @ 21 spm (13 SPI).
Naturally if you prove that you *did* do this I will apologize unreservedly, and encourage the others to do the same.
No no no ranger. You miss my point. You are _already_ doing it in your 15K training rows.ranger wrote:Sure.
That's what I'm going to do.
Just for the discipline of it, though, I will start with a FM and work down.
I can't wait for 14:21 BST (9:21am Eastern, 8:21am Central)At 10:21 - PaulH wrote:To join in with everyone else: No you didn't. This is an outright lie. You've said repeatedly that this is a thread for discussing training. Lying about it is the absolute antithesis of discussion. Hence you have 4 hours to admit to and apologize for your lie, or prove that it wasn't a lie. If you choose not to do one of those I'm closing the thread.ranger wrote: This morning so far, 15K OTErg, 1:48 @ 21 spm (13 SPI).
Naturally if you prove that you *did* do this I will apologize unreservedly, and encourage the others to do the same.
PaulH wrote:To join in with everyone else: No you didn't. This is an outright lie. You've said repeatedly that this is a thread for discussing training. Lying about it is the absolute antithesis of discussion. Hence you have 4 hours to admit to and apologize for your lie, or prove that it wasn't a lie. If you choose not to do one of those I'm closing the thread.ranger wrote: This morning so far, 15K OTErg, 1:48 @ 21 spm (13 SPI).
Naturally if you prove that you *did* do this I will apologize unreservedly, and encourage the others to do the same.
Yes, I did.PaulH wrote: No you didn't.
Then providing proof will fit easily into the three hours you have remaining, I'm sure. I shall begin crafting my apology.ranger wrote:Yes, I did.PaulH wrote: No you didn't.
That's a very impressive 15k Prof. Here's me thinking you couldn't even hold that pace for 5k. I feel ashamed that I ever doubted you.ranger wrote:This morning so far, 15K OTErg, 1:48 @ 21 spm (13 SPI).