Ranger's training thread

General discussion on Training. How to get better on your erg, how to use your erg to get better at another sport, or anything else about improving your abilities.
ranger
Marathon Poster
Posts: 11629
Joined: March 27th, 2006, 3:27 pm

Re: Ranger's training thread

Post by ranger » June 24th, 2011, 1:47 pm

4 x 1K, 1:38 @ 31 spm predicts a 6:32 2K.

20 x 1K, 1:38 @ 31 spm predicts a 6:16 2K.

ranger
Rich Cureton M 72 5'11" 165 lbs. 2K pbs: 6:27.5 (hwt), 6:28 (lwt)

ben990
1k Poster
Posts: 123
Joined: January 7th, 2011, 9:00 am

Re: Ranger's training thread

Post by ben990 » June 24th, 2011, 2:04 pm

What predicts a 7:03 2k? Lying about your training?
Rich Cureton M 60 hwt 5'11" 180 lbs. 7:02.3 (lwt) 2K

Fred
500m Poster
Posts: 96
Joined: March 24th, 2011, 1:04 pm

Re: Ranger's training thread

Post by Fred » June 24th, 2011, 2:14 pm

ranger wrote:4 x 1K, 1:38 @ 31 spm predicts a 6:32 2K.
20 x 1K, 1:38 @ 31 spm predicts a 6:16 2K.
ranger
Not true, you are getting confused again with trying to extrapolate non-continuous rowing.

4 x 1K, in 3:16 (1:38 avg) predicts a 6:32 2K.
20 x 1K, 3:16 (1:38 avg) predicts a 6:16 2K.

"4x1k where I saw 1:38 every once in a while but the average pace for the 1k's was 1:45" predicts a 7:00 2k.

ranger
Marathon Poster
Posts: 11629
Joined: March 27th, 2006, 3:27 pm

Re: Ranger's training thread

Post by ranger » June 24th, 2011, 2:45 pm

ben990 wrote:What predicts a 7:03 2k? Lying about your training?
With no concern for weight?

Fully prepared?

The way I row now?

Rowing well at low drag?

4 x 1K @ 1:46

I think I might row a FM @ 1:46--42K, no rest.

I only have to rate 24 spm.

HR 155 bpm, steady state.

ranger
Rich Cureton M 72 5'11" 165 lbs. 2K pbs: 6:27.5 (hwt), 6:28 (lwt)

aharmer
6k Poster
Posts: 627
Joined: December 2nd, 2009, 11:23 am

Re: Ranger's training thread

Post by aharmer » June 24th, 2011, 3:02 pm

Okay, so instead of arguing how fast you can or cannot do this workout for 20 pages, how about you actually do it? Even better, since you're ready to do the workout now, set a specific date and time for the workout. Immediately after the workout, post results of the workout regardless what the numbers show. I mean honestly, let's put something of substance on here or put it to bed. If you man up and post this workout regardless of results, you'll prove your real condition and earn a little respect that has been sorely lacking for about 5 years.

So what day and time should expect to see it?

leadville
2k Poster
Posts: 320
Joined: December 30th, 2009, 10:38 am
Location: Vermont and Connecticut

Re: Ranger's training thread

Post by leadville » June 24th, 2011, 4:31 pm

hey rangerboy - fifth time - are you going to OKC for master's nationals? you inferred you were.

now's your chance to beat Mike vB and show us all. on a straight, buoyed course with no curves, too!

well, what's it gonna be, rangerboy, Yes, or No?
Returned to sculling after an extended absence; National Champion 2010, 2011 D Ltwt 1x, PB 2k 7:04.5 @ 2010 Crash-b

ranger
Marathon Poster
Posts: 11629
Joined: March 27th, 2006, 3:27 pm

Re: Ranger's training thread

Post by ranger » June 24th, 2011, 4:59 pm

Nice 6K this afternoon over at Europe Lake, in white caps, one foot waves, and a 20 mph NW wind.

Interesting technical challenge.

12K OTErg before dawn.

ranger
Rich Cureton M 72 5'11" 165 lbs. 2K pbs: 6:27.5 (hwt), 6:28 (lwt)

ranger
Marathon Poster
Posts: 11629
Joined: March 27th, 2006, 3:27 pm

Re: Ranger's training thread

Post by ranger » June 24th, 2011, 5:02 pm

leadville wrote:hey rangerboy - fifth time - are you going to OKC for master's nationals? you inferred you were.

now's your chance to beat Mike vB and show us all. on a straight, buoyed course with no curves, too!

well, what's it gonna be, rangerboy, Yes, or No?
I am not in Mike's age category.

He's just a pupster.

You're just recently out of the womb.

BTW, I thought that Mike was taking a pass on sprints for this year.

No? Yes?

ranger
Rich Cureton M 72 5'11" 165 lbs. 2K pbs: 6:27.5 (hwt), 6:28 (lwt)

ranger
Marathon Poster
Posts: 11629
Joined: March 27th, 2006, 3:27 pm

Re: Ranger's training thread

Post by ranger » June 24th, 2011, 5:05 pm

aharmer wrote:Okay, so instead of arguing how fast you can or cannot do this workout for 20 pages, how about you actually do it? Even better, since you're ready to do the workout now, set a specific date and time for the workout. Immediately after the workout, post results of the workout regardless what the numbers show. I mean honestly, let's put something of substance on here or put it to bed. If you man up and post this workout regardless of results, you'll prove your real condition and earn a little respect that has been sorely lacking for about 5 years.

So what day and time should expect to see it?
Yea, I'm ready for Zatopek 1Ks.

That doesn't mean that I'll do them, though.

Then again, it doesn't mean that I won't, either.

:D :D

Go with the flow.

ranger
Rich Cureton M 72 5'11" 165 lbs. 2K pbs: 6:27.5 (hwt), 6:28 (lwt)

User avatar
Yankeerunner
10k Poster
Posts: 1193
Joined: March 16th, 2006, 12:17 pm
Location: West Newbury, MA
Contact:

Re: Ranger's training thread

Post by Yankeerunner » June 24th, 2011, 5:31 pm

NavigationHazard wrote:

Dream dream dream, dream
Dream dream dream, dream

When I sit down to write a post
When I want to repeat a boast
Instead of a workout all I ever do is dream

When I shove off in my boat
I need God's help to stay afloat
Instead of a workout all I ever do is dream

Though I lack the steam I'll row six sixteen,
Anytime night or day
Only trouble is, gee whiz, I'm dreaming my life away

I jerk the chain and rush the slide
I row so slow and that is why
Instead of a workout all I ever do is dream....


Still....NO sign of land.......How long is it?
:mrgreen:
55-59: 1:33.5 3:19.2 6:55.7 18:22.0 2:47:26.5
60-64: 1:35.9 3:23.8 7:06.7 18:40.8 2:48:53.6
65-69: 1:38.6 3:31.9 7:19.2 19:26.6 3:02:06.0
70-74: 1:40.2 3:33.4 7:32.6 19:50.5 3:06:36.8
75-76: 1:43.9 3:47.7 7:50.2 20:51.3 3:13:55.7

ranger
Marathon Poster
Posts: 11629
Joined: March 27th, 2006, 3:27 pm

Re: Ranger's training thread

Post by ranger » June 25th, 2011, 4:46 am

Yankeerunner wrote:

Still....NO sign of land.......How long is it?
:mrgreen:
Curious that you continue to get this exactly backwards.

If the best that current 60s lwts can muster is 6:52 2K, then relative to any conceivable standards of rowing well, it is these other folks who are hopelessly lost at sea, while my boat is ramping right up on shore.

Everyone else is missing it by 8 seconds per 500m, 3 SPI, a mile over 60min, 16 minutes over a FM, etc.

They're pullin' like little old ladies in the park out strollin' the grandkids.

ranger
Rich Cureton M 72 5'11" 165 lbs. 2K pbs: 6:27.5 (hwt), 6:28 (lwt)

snowleopard
6k Poster
Posts: 936
Joined: September 23rd, 2009, 4:16 am

Re: Ranger's training thread

Post by snowleopard » June 25th, 2011, 5:16 am

ranger wrote:They're pullin' like little old ladies in the park out strollin' the grandkids.
http://concept2.co.uk/birc/result_analy ... c_id=37858

ranger
Marathon Poster
Posts: 11629
Joined: March 27th, 2006, 3:27 pm

Re: Ranger's training thread

Post by ranger » June 25th, 2011, 6:33 am

East winds have finally abated here in Door County, WI.

So the clouds and rain are gone.

Northern air blew in yesterday.

Brilliantly clear.

Image

12K OTErg before dawn.

Over to Europe Lake after breakfast for about the same OTW.

BTW, with my better finishes, I am now pulling 12.5 SPI rather than 12 SPI.

At 10 MPS, I am 1:37 @ 31 spm (12.5 SPI), on the money.

This means that I will only have to rate 34 spm for 2K to pull 1:34/6:16.

34 spm is just the rate that all of the other good 55s/60s lightweights use for 2K.

As I have mentioned, by and large, everyone the same age and weight rows at the same rate for the same distance.

The only diference is how well they row, how much work they get done, just naturally, on each stroke.

My case will be _very_ odd.

The next time I race as a 60s lwt, I will go up and down the slide with everyone else, in unison, but I will be pulling 12.5 SPI and everyone else will be pulling 9.5 SPI.

Bizarre.

At 34 spm, 3 SPI is worth 102 watts, right around 10 seconds per 500m.

ranger
Rich Cureton M 72 5'11" 165 lbs. 2K pbs: 6:27.5 (hwt), 6:28 (lwt)

JimR
5k Poster
Posts: 544
Joined: March 20th, 2006, 1:08 pm

Re: Ranger's training thread

Post by JimR » June 25th, 2011, 8:31 am

ranger wrote:As I have mentioned, by and large, everyone the same age and weight rows at the same rate for the same distance.
You have more than mentioned ths ... you have posted it nearly every day for 10 years.

You have left out the difference between you and everyone else though ... you keep taking breaks, everyone else rows continously. Sadly, in trials and races the breaks count.

JimR

ranger
Marathon Poster
Posts: 11629
Joined: March 27th, 2006, 3:27 pm

Re: Ranger's training thread

Post by ranger » June 25th, 2011, 10:04 am

JimR wrote:
ranger wrote:As I have mentioned, by and large, everyone the same age and weight rows at the same rate for the same distance.
You have more than mentioned ths ... you have posted it nearly every day for 10 years.

You have left out the difference between you and everyone else though ... you keep taking breaks, everyone else rows continously. Sadly, in trials and races the breaks count.

JimR
My Baltimore row in 2006 when I was 55, which I did at high drag without even preparing for it, was at 12 SPI, 6:29.7.

31.5 spm

No breaks.

I kicked in the last 300m, 1:34 @ 34 spm.

At 12.5 SPI (and the same rate), that 6:29.7 becomes 6:24, Hendershott's 60s hwt WR.

Everyone gets about a dozen seconds from a couple of months of anaerobic sharpening.

That should get me more than enough umph for the additional 2.5 spm that I will need at 12.5 SPI to pull 1:34/6:16.

Given my little legs, at low drag, 34 spm is not a high rate at all.

My drive time is now only .5 seconds, so at 34 spm, I am still in a _huge_ 2.6-to-1 ratio.

_Very_ leisurely business.

Back in 2002-2003, I finished my 2Ks at 40 spm in a 1-to-1 ratio.

Frenetic stuff.

No 55-year-old my size has ever come anywhere near pulling sub-6:30, fully prepared.

After five more years of work on technique, I am now _much_ better than that.

And given that my work on technique is complete, I am now preparing to race.

I now row well (13 SPI) at low drag (120 df.).

ranger
Last edited by ranger on June 25th, 2011, 10:27 am, edited 7 times in total.
Rich Cureton M 72 5'11" 165 lbs. 2K pbs: 6:27.5 (hwt), 6:28 (lwt)

Locked