Are you a negative or positive splitter?

General discussion on Training. How to get better on your erg, how to use your erg to get better at another sport, or anything else about improving your abilities.
georgeed
Paddler
Posts: 12
Joined: January 12th, 2013, 11:43 pm

Re: Are you a negative or positive splitter?

Post by georgeed » October 25th, 2016, 5:26 am

hjs: I think we're saying the same thing.

User avatar
hjs
Marathon Poster
Posts: 10076
Joined: March 16th, 2006, 3:18 pm
Location: Amstelveen the netherlands

Re: Are you a negative or positive splitter?

Post by hjs » October 25th, 2016, 5:33 am

georgeed wrote:hjs: I think we're saying the same thing.
Sorry, proberly yes, although I don,t like the term psyche out, its more really having an advantage/disadvantage, not just a mental edge.

User avatar
Gammmmo
Half Marathon Poster
Posts: 2262
Joined: March 26th, 2016, 1:12 pm

Re: Are you a negative or positive splitter?

Post by Gammmmo » October 25th, 2016, 6:05 am

hjs wrote:
Gammmmo wrote:
remisture wrote:I think my PRs are so close to my max that a slow start makes it impossible to catch up the lost meters in the end.
Dangerous place to be when you don't feel like there's much more headroom over an above what you've already achieved. In reality though I think v few of us get that close.
Stick around 2 years and read this again :wink:
What do you mean Henry? That in 2 years I'll have improved, Remi will be better again, or both, or we'll be at much the same level as we are now???

Regarding OTW rowing and purely as an observer, Olympic crews often seem to like going out hard and into the lead so they can observe what is going on with other boats (fleetingly!) and to make a statement. I suppose with erging you still have some feedback - when I did the Devon Indoor Rowing Champs everyone's PM showed where one was in relation to other ergs and the distance between you and them. If you are closely matched then I guess that feedback still plays a role with whether you choose to negative or positive split. One guy went out too hard and his challenge for the overall win melted away....maybe some people employ strategies to "draw others out" and abandon any pacing strategy in an attempt to make others crack. I bet it's been done even though with erging most people must have a clear idea of what they are and are not capable of with a high degree of accuracy i.e. most do what they can irrespective of others and ignore other ergs. (???)
Paul, 49M, 5'11" 83kg (sprint PBs HWT), ex biker now lifting
Deadlift=190kg, LP=1:15, 100m=15.7s, 1min=350m Image
Targets: 14s (100m), 355m+ 1min, 1:27(500m), 3:11(1K)

Erg on!

gooseflight
2k Poster
Posts: 256
Joined: April 2nd, 2006, 3:53 am
Location: Scotland

Re: Are you a negative or positive splitter?

Post by gooseflight » October 25th, 2016, 6:16 am

Gammmmo wrote:One guy went out too hard and his challenge for the overall win melted away....maybe some people employ strategies to "draw others out" and abandon any pacing strategy in an attempt to make others crack. I bet it's been done even though with erging most people must have a clear idea of what they are and are not capable of with a high degree of accuracy i.e. most do what they can irrespective of others and ignore other ergs. (???)
In erg races there are many challengers for the lead in the first 500m :)

In an erg race you can only pull what your training tells you you can pull. Adrenaline is not your friend.
Roy Walter
M55 | 185cm | 90kg | Journeyman Erger
PBs (2004): 6:38 (2K) | 5:22.9 (mile) | 17:39.6 (5K) | 8323 (30 mins) | 36:52 (10K) | 1:22:03 (HM '05)

User avatar
hjs
Marathon Poster
Posts: 10076
Joined: March 16th, 2006, 3:18 pm
Location: Amstelveen the netherlands

Re: Are you a negative or positive splitter?

Post by hjs » October 25th, 2016, 6:19 am

Gammmmo wrote:
What do you mean Henry? That in 2 years I'll have improved, Remi will be better again, or both, or we'll be at much the same level as we are now???

Regarding OTW rowing and purely as an observer, Olympic crews often seem to like going out hard and into the lead so they can observe what is going on with other boats (fleetingly!) and to make a statement. I suppose with erging you still have some feedback - when I did the Devon Indoor Rowing Champs everyone's PM showed where one was in relation to other ergs and the distance between you and them. If you are closely matched then I guess that feedback still plays a role with whether you choose to negative or positive split. One guy went out too hard and his challenge for the overall win melted away....maybe some people employ strategies to "draw others out" and abandon any pacing strategy in an attempt to make others crack. I bet it's been done.
Plateauing. After the first gains, progress gets slow if any at all. You still improve, but from here the gains will slow down, I think its not so difficult to reach 90% of ones potentential. Most ergers/rowers, bit depending on the fitness status reach their peak within 1 2 years. Not that there is no more to gain, but thats a few %.

lindsayh
Half Marathon Poster
Posts: 3635
Joined: June 23rd, 2013, 3:32 am
Location: Sydney, Australia

Re: Are you a negative or positive splitter?

Post by lindsayh » October 25th, 2016, 6:23 am

Gammmmo wrote:Regarding OTW rowing and purely as an observer, Olympic crews often seem to like going out hard and into the lead so they can observe what is going on with other boats (fleetingly!) and to make a statement. I suppose with erging you still have some feedback - when I did the Devon Indoor Rowing Champs everyone's PM showed where one was in relation to other ergs and the distance between you and them. If you are closely matched then I guess that feedback still plays a role with whether you choose to negative or positive split. One guy went out too hard and his challenge for the overall win melted away....maybe some people employ strategies to "draw others out" and abandon any pacing strategy in an attempt to make others crack. I bet it's been done even though with erging most people must have a clear idea of what they are and are not capable of with a high degree of accuracy i.e. most do what they can irrespective of others and ignore other ergs. (???)
IMO the erg is a bit different to OTW where there does seem to be an advantage in getting ahead and then controlling a little. When racing on the erg it can be a big mistake to go out too hard to cover a fast starter - much better to stick to your plan and don't be "spooked" by someone who is probably going to hit the wall (or is much faster than you anyway)
Lindsay
72yo 93kg
Sydney Australia
Forum Flyer
PBs (65y+) 1 min 349m, 500m 1:29.8, 1k 3:11.7 2k 6:47.4, 5km 18:07.9, 30' 7928m, 10k 37:57.2, 60' 15368m

User avatar
Gammmmo
Half Marathon Poster
Posts: 2262
Joined: March 26th, 2016, 1:12 pm

Re: Are you a negative or positive splitter?

Post by Gammmmo » October 25th, 2016, 6:25 am

hjs wrote:Plateauing. After the first gains, progress gets slow if any at all. You still improve, but from here the gains will slow down, I think its not so difficult to reach 90% of ones potentential. Most ergers/rowers, bit depending on the fitness status reach their peak within 1 2 years. Not that there is no more to gain, but thats a few %.
well, it is interesting I have improved to much the same standard as when I was last into erging just over 10 years ago....I'm hoping I can eek out some more and *in theory* I should be able to comparing the training I did then and what I could do. The problem I have found recently is I pick up little injuries at a certain volume of training.
Paul, 49M, 5'11" 83kg (sprint PBs HWT), ex biker now lifting
Deadlift=190kg, LP=1:15, 100m=15.7s, 1min=350m Image
Targets: 14s (100m), 355m+ 1min, 1:27(500m), 3:11(1K)

Erg on!

User avatar
hjs
Marathon Poster
Posts: 10076
Joined: March 16th, 2006, 3:18 pm
Location: Amstelveen the netherlands

Re: Are you a negative or positive splitter?

Post by hjs » October 25th, 2016, 6:39 am

Gammmmo wrote:
hjs wrote:Plateauing. After the first gains, progress gets slow if any at all. You still improve, but from here the gains will slow down, I think its not so difficult to reach 90% of ones potentential. Most ergers/rowers, bit depending on the fitness status reach their peak within 1 2 years. Not that there is no more to gain, but thats a few %.
well, it is interesting I have improved to much the same standard as when I was last into erging just over 10 years ago....I'm hoping I can eek out some more and *in theory* I should be able to comparing the training I did then and what I could do. The problem I have found recently is I pick up little injuries at a certain volume of training.
I found the same, roughly, after a long break, years I got soon close to my old level, just a bit lower. Age related. Around that level I stayed relative easy. Over the years I do notice that my aerobic fitness has gotten a bit less. And compared to my younger days a good chunck.

Injuries certainly don,t help, for me those are whats held me back often, although proberly not that much. Being strong/balanced is also a talent.

Pie Man
5k Poster
Posts: 569
Joined: May 12th, 2016, 9:35 am
Location: UK

Re: Are you a negative or positive splitter?

Post by Pie Man » October 25th, 2016, 6:48 am

Gammmmo wrote: The problem I have found recently is I pick up little injuries at a certain volume of training.
This is my problem as well, the PP has done a lot of good, but I do feel on the edge for injuries, even though I have mainly picked them up in day to day living rather than on the erg.
Piers 53m was 73Kg 175cm to 2019 now 78kg
500m 1:34 (HW 2020) 2k 7:09.5 (2017 LWT) 10k 39:58.9 (2016 LWT) HM 1:28:26.9 (2017 LWT)

User avatar
Gammmmo
Half Marathon Poster
Posts: 2262
Joined: March 26th, 2016, 1:12 pm

Re: Are you a negative or positive splitter?

Post by Gammmmo » October 25th, 2016, 7:06 am

hjs/Pieman, once you start doing any sport alot overuse injuries do happen or it becomes slightly unhealthy. When I was cycling, I got v v fit but it made me physcially v weak. I was effortlessly at 65kg at 5'11" but was weak off the bike e.g. just going to pick something heavy up, and I felt fragile e.g. lower back was often stiff/painful. Taken to an extreme, some professional riders actually can't walk that well - their bodies are so used to sitting on a bike the muscles have developed in a certain way to such a degree anything else feels all wrong. I remember David Millar saying he had to walk in zig zags up steep hills!!!
Paul, 49M, 5'11" 83kg (sprint PBs HWT), ex biker now lifting
Deadlift=190kg, LP=1:15, 100m=15.7s, 1min=350m Image
Targets: 14s (100m), 355m+ 1min, 1:27(500m), 3:11(1K)

Erg on!

gooseflight
2k Poster
Posts: 256
Joined: April 2nd, 2006, 3:53 am
Location: Scotland

Re: Are you a negative or positive splitter?

Post by gooseflight » October 25th, 2016, 7:11 am

Gammmmo wrote:I remember David Millar saying he had to walk in zig zags up steep hills!!!
That's why he never won the TdF. You have to be able to run them these days :)
Roy Walter
M55 | 185cm | 90kg | Journeyman Erger
PBs (2004): 6:38 (2K) | 5:22.9 (mile) | 17:39.6 (5K) | 8323 (30 mins) | 36:52 (10K) | 1:22:03 (HM '05)

Bob S.
Marathon Poster
Posts: 5142
Joined: March 16th, 2006, 12:00 pm

Re: Are you a negative or positive splitter?

Post by Bob S. » October 25th, 2016, 10:56 am

Gammmmo wrote:I bet it's been done even though with erging most people must have a clear idea of what they are and are not capable of with a high degree of accuracy i.e. most do what they can irrespective of others and ignore other ergs. (???)
That maybe the case for older ergers with a fair amount of experience. I doubt that it applies to "most", especially in juniors, collegiate, and elite rowers who do most of their racing OTW. They are the largest groups at the competitions. They are also far more important than all the masters and older.

Post Reply