Are you a negative or positive splitter?
Re: Are you a negative or positive splitter?
hjs: I think we're saying the same thing.
- hjs
- Marathon Poster
- Posts: 10076
- Joined: March 16th, 2006, 3:18 pm
- Location: Amstelveen the netherlands
Re: Are you a negative or positive splitter?
Sorry, proberly yes, although I don,t like the term psyche out, its more really having an advantage/disadvantage, not just a mental edge.georgeed wrote:hjs: I think we're saying the same thing.
Re: Are you a negative or positive splitter?
What do you mean Henry? That in 2 years I'll have improved, Remi will be better again, or both, or we'll be at much the same level as we are now???hjs wrote:Stick around 2 years and read this againGammmmo wrote:Dangerous place to be when you don't feel like there's much more headroom over an above what you've already achieved. In reality though I think v few of us get that close.remisture wrote:I think my PRs are so close to my max that a slow start makes it impossible to catch up the lost meters in the end.
Regarding OTW rowing and purely as an observer, Olympic crews often seem to like going out hard and into the lead so they can observe what is going on with other boats (fleetingly!) and to make a statement. I suppose with erging you still have some feedback - when I did the Devon Indoor Rowing Champs everyone's PM showed where one was in relation to other ergs and the distance between you and them. If you are closely matched then I guess that feedback still plays a role with whether you choose to negative or positive split. One guy went out too hard and his challenge for the overall win melted away....maybe some people employ strategies to "draw others out" and abandon any pacing strategy in an attempt to make others crack. I bet it's been done even though with erging most people must have a clear idea of what they are and are not capable of with a high degree of accuracy i.e. most do what they can irrespective of others and ignore other ergs. (???)
Paul, 49M, 5'11" 83kg (sprint PBs HWT), ex biker now lifting
Deadlift=190kg, LP=1:15, 100m=15.7s, 1min=350m
Targets: 14s (100m), 355m+ 1min, 1:27(500m), 3:11(1K)
Erg on!
Deadlift=190kg, LP=1:15, 100m=15.7s, 1min=350m
Targets: 14s (100m), 355m+ 1min, 1:27(500m), 3:11(1K)
Erg on!
-
- 2k Poster
- Posts: 256
- Joined: April 2nd, 2006, 3:53 am
- Location: Scotland
Re: Are you a negative or positive splitter?
In erg races there are many challengers for the lead in the first 500mGammmmo wrote:One guy went out too hard and his challenge for the overall win melted away....maybe some people employ strategies to "draw others out" and abandon any pacing strategy in an attempt to make others crack. I bet it's been done even though with erging most people must have a clear idea of what they are and are not capable of with a high degree of accuracy i.e. most do what they can irrespective of others and ignore other ergs. (???)
In an erg race you can only pull what your training tells you you can pull. Adrenaline is not your friend.
Roy Walter
M55 | 185cm | 90kg | Journeyman Erger
PBs (2004): 6:38 (2K) | 5:22.9 (mile) | 17:39.6 (5K) | 8323 (30 mins) | 36:52 (10K) | 1:22:03 (HM '05)
M55 | 185cm | 90kg | Journeyman Erger
PBs (2004): 6:38 (2K) | 5:22.9 (mile) | 17:39.6 (5K) | 8323 (30 mins) | 36:52 (10K) | 1:22:03 (HM '05)
- hjs
- Marathon Poster
- Posts: 10076
- Joined: March 16th, 2006, 3:18 pm
- Location: Amstelveen the netherlands
Re: Are you a negative or positive splitter?
Plateauing. After the first gains, progress gets slow if any at all. You still improve, but from here the gains will slow down, I think its not so difficult to reach 90% of ones potentential. Most ergers/rowers, bit depending on the fitness status reach their peak within 1 2 years. Not that there is no more to gain, but thats a few %.Gammmmo wrote:
What do you mean Henry? That in 2 years I'll have improved, Remi will be better again, or both, or we'll be at much the same level as we are now???
Regarding OTW rowing and purely as an observer, Olympic crews often seem to like going out hard and into the lead so they can observe what is going on with other boats (fleetingly!) and to make a statement. I suppose with erging you still have some feedback - when I did the Devon Indoor Rowing Champs everyone's PM showed where one was in relation to other ergs and the distance between you and them. If you are closely matched then I guess that feedback still plays a role with whether you choose to negative or positive split. One guy went out too hard and his challenge for the overall win melted away....maybe some people employ strategies to "draw others out" and abandon any pacing strategy in an attempt to make others crack. I bet it's been done.
-
- Half Marathon Poster
- Posts: 3635
- Joined: June 23rd, 2013, 3:32 am
- Location: Sydney, Australia
Re: Are you a negative or positive splitter?
IMO the erg is a bit different to OTW where there does seem to be an advantage in getting ahead and then controlling a little. When racing on the erg it can be a big mistake to go out too hard to cover a fast starter - much better to stick to your plan and don't be "spooked" by someone who is probably going to hit the wall (or is much faster than you anyway)Gammmmo wrote:Regarding OTW rowing and purely as an observer, Olympic crews often seem to like going out hard and into the lead so they can observe what is going on with other boats (fleetingly!) and to make a statement. I suppose with erging you still have some feedback - when I did the Devon Indoor Rowing Champs everyone's PM showed where one was in relation to other ergs and the distance between you and them. If you are closely matched then I guess that feedback still plays a role with whether you choose to negative or positive split. One guy went out too hard and his challenge for the overall win melted away....maybe some people employ strategies to "draw others out" and abandon any pacing strategy in an attempt to make others crack. I bet it's been done even though with erging most people must have a clear idea of what they are and are not capable of with a high degree of accuracy i.e. most do what they can irrespective of others and ignore other ergs. (???)
Lindsay
72yo 93kg
Sydney Australia
Forum Flyer
PBs (65y+) 1 min 349m, 500m 1:29.8, 1k 3:11.7 2k 6:47.4, 5km 18:07.9, 30' 7928m, 10k 37:57.2, 60' 15368m
72yo 93kg
Sydney Australia
Forum Flyer
PBs (65y+) 1 min 349m, 500m 1:29.8, 1k 3:11.7 2k 6:47.4, 5km 18:07.9, 30' 7928m, 10k 37:57.2, 60' 15368m
Re: Are you a negative or positive splitter?
well, it is interesting I have improved to much the same standard as when I was last into erging just over 10 years ago....I'm hoping I can eek out some more and *in theory* I should be able to comparing the training I did then and what I could do. The problem I have found recently is I pick up little injuries at a certain volume of training.hjs wrote:Plateauing. After the first gains, progress gets slow if any at all. You still improve, but from here the gains will slow down, I think its not so difficult to reach 90% of ones potentential. Most ergers/rowers, bit depending on the fitness status reach their peak within 1 2 years. Not that there is no more to gain, but thats a few %.
Paul, 49M, 5'11" 83kg (sprint PBs HWT), ex biker now lifting
Deadlift=190kg, LP=1:15, 100m=15.7s, 1min=350m
Targets: 14s (100m), 355m+ 1min, 1:27(500m), 3:11(1K)
Erg on!
Deadlift=190kg, LP=1:15, 100m=15.7s, 1min=350m
Targets: 14s (100m), 355m+ 1min, 1:27(500m), 3:11(1K)
Erg on!
- hjs
- Marathon Poster
- Posts: 10076
- Joined: March 16th, 2006, 3:18 pm
- Location: Amstelveen the netherlands
Re: Are you a negative or positive splitter?
I found the same, roughly, after a long break, years I got soon close to my old level, just a bit lower. Age related. Around that level I stayed relative easy. Over the years I do notice that my aerobic fitness has gotten a bit less. And compared to my younger days a good chunck.Gammmmo wrote:well, it is interesting I have improved to much the same standard as when I was last into erging just over 10 years ago....I'm hoping I can eek out some more and *in theory* I should be able to comparing the training I did then and what I could do. The problem I have found recently is I pick up little injuries at a certain volume of training.hjs wrote:Plateauing. After the first gains, progress gets slow if any at all. You still improve, but from here the gains will slow down, I think its not so difficult to reach 90% of ones potentential. Most ergers/rowers, bit depending on the fitness status reach their peak within 1 2 years. Not that there is no more to gain, but thats a few %.
Injuries certainly don,t help, for me those are whats held me back often, although proberly not that much. Being strong/balanced is also a talent.
Re: Are you a negative or positive splitter?
This is my problem as well, the PP has done a lot of good, but I do feel on the edge for injuries, even though I have mainly picked them up in day to day living rather than on the erg.Gammmmo wrote: The problem I have found recently is I pick up little injuries at a certain volume of training.
Piers 53m was 73Kg 175cm to 2019 now 78kg
500m 1:34 (HW 2020) 2k 7:09.5 (2017 LWT) 10k 39:58.9 (2016 LWT) HM 1:28:26.9 (2017 LWT)
500m 1:34 (HW 2020) 2k 7:09.5 (2017 LWT) 10k 39:58.9 (2016 LWT) HM 1:28:26.9 (2017 LWT)
Re: Are you a negative or positive splitter?
hjs/Pieman, once you start doing any sport alot overuse injuries do happen or it becomes slightly unhealthy. When I was cycling, I got v v fit but it made me physcially v weak. I was effortlessly at 65kg at 5'11" but was weak off the bike e.g. just going to pick something heavy up, and I felt fragile e.g. lower back was often stiff/painful. Taken to an extreme, some professional riders actually can't walk that well - their bodies are so used to sitting on a bike the muscles have developed in a certain way to such a degree anything else feels all wrong. I remember David Millar saying he had to walk in zig zags up steep hills!!!
Paul, 49M, 5'11" 83kg (sprint PBs HWT), ex biker now lifting
Deadlift=190kg, LP=1:15, 100m=15.7s, 1min=350m
Targets: 14s (100m), 355m+ 1min, 1:27(500m), 3:11(1K)
Erg on!
Deadlift=190kg, LP=1:15, 100m=15.7s, 1min=350m
Targets: 14s (100m), 355m+ 1min, 1:27(500m), 3:11(1K)
Erg on!
-
- 2k Poster
- Posts: 256
- Joined: April 2nd, 2006, 3:53 am
- Location: Scotland
Re: Are you a negative or positive splitter?
That's why he never won the TdF. You have to be able to run them these daysGammmmo wrote:I remember David Millar saying he had to walk in zig zags up steep hills!!!
Roy Walter
M55 | 185cm | 90kg | Journeyman Erger
PBs (2004): 6:38 (2K) | 5:22.9 (mile) | 17:39.6 (5K) | 8323 (30 mins) | 36:52 (10K) | 1:22:03 (HM '05)
M55 | 185cm | 90kg | Journeyman Erger
PBs (2004): 6:38 (2K) | 5:22.9 (mile) | 17:39.6 (5K) | 8323 (30 mins) | 36:52 (10K) | 1:22:03 (HM '05)
Re: Are you a negative or positive splitter?
That maybe the case for older ergers with a fair amount of experience. I doubt that it applies to "most", especially in juniors, collegiate, and elite rowers who do most of their racing OTW. They are the largest groups at the competitions. They are also far more important than all the masters and older.Gammmmo wrote:I bet it's been done even though with erging most people must have a clear idea of what they are and are not capable of with a high degree of accuracy i.e. most do what they can irrespective of others and ignore other ergs. (???)