Post
by Cyclingman1 » June 14th, 2012, 6:12 am
Nosmo wrote:If you were training seriously, one rule of thumb is that it takes three times longer then the layoff to get back.
Hopefully, that is a worst case number. One possible positive of coming back from a fairly long layoff is that with a conscious effort of reduced, sustainable pace, more miles can be done which has its benefits. Or at least in the case of someone who tends to have a short mileage, high intensity program.
This is a good time of the year to have a slowdown in anticipation of ramping up for the winter indoor rowing events. But being sick and dropping back more than one would want adds an element of anxiety. One just has to have confidence that past levels can be reached again.
JimG, Gainesville, Ga, 78, 76", 205lb. PBs:
66-69: .5,1,2,5,6,10K: 1:30.8 3:14.1 6:40.7 17:34.0 21:18.1 36:21.7 30;60;HM: 8337 16237 1:20:25
70-78: .5,1,2,5,6,10K: 1:32.7 3:19.5 6:58.1 17:55.3 21:32.6 36:41.9 30;60;HM: 8214 15353 1:23:02.5