Ranger's training thread
Re: Ranger's training thread
Hey.
I hear that most people think that the way to get rich is to buy high and sell low.
Go figure.
It is now a documented fact.
The investment strategies of the average individual investor are _less_ fruitful than doing nothing.
The things people think they should do with their money, and are often moved to do, are not only unfruitful.
They are detrimental!
ranger
I hear that most people think that the way to get rich is to buy high and sell low.
Go figure.
It is now a documented fact.
The investment strategies of the average individual investor are _less_ fruitful than doing nothing.
The things people think they should do with their money, and are often moved to do, are not only unfruitful.
They are detrimental!
ranger
Rich Cureton M 72 5'11" 165 lbs. 2K pbs: 6:27.5 (hwt), 6:28 (lwt)
Re: Ranger's training thread
I have posted the results of my work on technique--in various forms (videos, screen shots, trials, etc.).Citroen wrote:I think many of us follow this thread hoping for a verifiable result to be posted
This work is now done.
Will this work on technique have a bearing on my distance times and 2K?
We'll soon see.
I now row well (13 SPI) at low drag (95 df.).
ranger
Rich Cureton M 72 5'11" 165 lbs. 2K pbs: 6:27.5 (hwt), 6:28 (lwt)
- Citroen
- SpamTeam
- Posts: 8010
- Joined: March 16th, 2006, 3:28 pm
- Location: A small cave in deepest darkest Basingstoke, UK
Re: Ranger's training thread
Where's the IND_V 6:16?ranger wrote:I have posted the results of my work on technique--in various forms (videos, screen shots, trials, etc.).Citroen wrote:I think many of us follow this thread hoping for a verifiable result to be posted
This work is now done.
Will this work on technique have a bearing on my distance times and 2K?
We'll soon see.
I now row well (13 SPI) at low drag (95 df.).
ranger
Where's the IND_V 1:44 FM?
Why can't I find a result from you that's better than your 7:02 2K?
Have they changed the ranking system to use SPI and df values or is it still the traditional distance over time?
The videos and photos are either ancient history, or irrelevant short distances with funky force curves.
Re: Ranger's training thread
Nope.citroen wrote:Have they changed the ranking system to use SPI and df values or is it still the traditional distance over time?
As the times over distances rowed in the rankings illustrate, everyone is neglecting technique, so (after a very short while) they are just getting worse and worse.
ranger
Rich Cureton M 72 5'11" 165 lbs. 2K pbs: 6:27.5 (hwt), 6:28 (lwt)
Re: Ranger's training thread
There is nothing more telling about your rowing than your force curve.citroen wrote:funky force curves
It's the sine qua non of training.
If you aren't effective and efficient in your rowing, even if you are fast, you are falling _waaay_ short of your potential.
You might be fit, but you are wasting your time and energy!
High peak forces reflect quick legs, good timing, and complex footwork.
Short drive times indicate high ratios.
The former adds effectiveness.
The latter, efficiency.
ranger
Rich Cureton M 72 5'11" 165 lbs. 2K pbs: 6:27.5 (hwt), 6:28 (lwt)
Re: Ranger's training thread
Of course as usual he completed ignored your question and cam back with a nonsense answerCitroen wrote:Where's the IND_V 6:16?ranger wrote:I have posted the results of my work on technique--in various forms (videos, screen shots, trials, etc.).Citroen wrote:I think many of us follow this thread hoping for a verifiable result to be posted
This work is now done.
Will this work on technique have a bearing on my distance times and 2K?
We'll soon see.
I now row well (13 SPI) at low drag (95 df.).
ranger
Where's the IND_V 1:44 FM?
Why can't I find a result from you that's better than your 7:02 2K?
Have they changed the ranking system to use SPI and df values or is it still the traditional distance over time?
The videos and photos are either ancient history, or irrelevant short distances with funky force curves.
JD
Age: 51; H: 6"5'; W: 172 lbs;
Age: 51; H: 6"5'; W: 172 lbs;
-
- 6k Poster
- Posts: 936
- Joined: September 23rd, 2009, 4:16 am
Re: Ranger's training thread
It says nothing about _rowing_ and very little about one's erging.ranger wrote:There is nothing more telling about your rowing than your force curve.citroen wrote:funky force curves
It's the sine qua non of training.
it's a one stroke stunt; a cameo. Anyone could be taught to replicate your precious force curve in a matter of hours.
Training is about outcomes. If you don't subscribe to that you are just exercising. You're a cellar rat.
Outcomes measure the effectiveness of your training. For ergers and rowers the only outcome that really counts is the 2K.
Your season's best is a 7:02 and change. More than a 100 watts away from your self-declared potential.
-
- 2k Poster
- Posts: 320
- Joined: December 30th, 2009, 10:38 am
- Location: Vermont and Connecticut
Re: Ranger's training thread
Careful, he may be on the next plane headed east...bellboy wrote:ausrwr wrote:Rich, the only way you're going to pull a 6:16 LWT is to follow EE into a bar and dose his drink with Rohypnol.ranger wrote:So.
Here is your chance to be helpful and positive, Henry.
What do you think I should do in order to pull a lwt 6:16?
Any ideas?
ranger
Post of the year without question!
Returned to sculling after an extended absence; National Champion 2010, 2011 D Ltwt 1x, PB 2k 7:04.5 @ 2010 Crash-b
Re: Ranger's training thread
Well, you do have a point there. As far as high moral ground is concerned, it is obvious that I have no claim to that. My own posting establishes the fact the I read the thread (well the responses, at least) and that alone is enough to give the lie to any such claimsnowleopard wrote: Crikey Bob! Do you think I (or anyone else) am expecting a sensible answer?
Beware of occupying the moral high ground, nothing here is quite what it seems
Bob S.
Re: Ranger's training thread
That may be true for diehard ergers, but real rowers have a lot more options, ranging on up to ocean crossings.snowleopard wrote:For ergers and rowers the only outcome that really counts is the 2K.
Bob S.
Re: Ranger's training thread
No, as I have demonstrated, the force curves on all of my strokes look the same.snowleopard wrote:t's a one stroke stunt
That's true for everyone.
Rowing is repetitive.
Just more of the same, more of the same.
The force curve tells you what you are doing with your technique.
ranger
Rich Cureton M 72 5'11" 165 lbs. 2K pbs: 6:27.5 (hwt), 6:28 (lwt)
Re: Ranger's training thread
What does a season have to do with my rowing goals?snowleopard wrote:Training is about outcomes. If you don't subscribe to that you are just exercising. You're a cellar rat.
Outcomes measure the effectiveness of your training. For ergers and rowers the only outcome that really counts is the 2K.
Your season's best is a 7:02 and change. More than a 100 watts away from your self-declared potential.
I have three WR rows.
I have won all of the major championships.
Last year no one my age came within 20 seconds of my 2K, even though I didn't prepare for my races.
My goal now is to row to the limits of my potential.
That's a trick, not a one-season affair.
My potential, I think, is about three seconds per 500m faster than my pb.
You don't get that done by racing.
You get that done by overcoming your weaknesses, which I have now done.
To focus on outcomes elides an interest in training altogether.
The outcome is the result of the training.
The outcome is not the training.
For those who have prepared to race many times, race preparation is also not training.
No one ever got any better from race preparation.
Those who just prepare to race, and race, prepare to race, and race, just get worse and worse, especially if they are aging.
ranger
Last edited by ranger on April 21st, 2011, 6:26 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Rich Cureton M 72 5'11" 165 lbs. 2K pbs: 6:27.5 (hwt), 6:28 (lwt)
Re: Ranger's training thread
Congrats to you for overcoming all of your weaknesses over the last 6 years of training. We'll see the fruits of that labor in a 1:48 FM by the end of this weekend, or have plans changed?ranger wrote:What does a season have to do with my rowing goals?snowleopard wrote:Training is about outcomes. If you don't subscribe to that you are just exercising. You're a cellar rat.
Outcomes measure the effectiveness of your training. For ergers and rowers the only outcome that really counts is the 2K.
Your season's best is a 7:02 and change. More than a 100 watts away from your self-declared potential.
I have three WR rows.
I have won all of the major championships.
Last year no one my age came within 20 seconds of my 2K, even though I didn't prepare for my races.
My goal now is to row to the limits of my potential.
That's a trick, not a one-season affair.
My potential, I think, is about three seconds per 500m faster than my pb.
You don't get that done by racing.
You get that done by overcoming your weaknesses, which I have now done.
To focus on outcomes, elides an interest in training altogether.
The outcome is the result of the training.
The outcome is not the training.
For those who have prepared to race many times, race preparation is also not training.
No one ever got any better from race preparation.
Those who just prepare to race, and race, prepare to race, and race, just get worse and worse, especially if they are aging.
ranger
Re: Ranger's training thread
No change in plans.aharmer wrote:Congrats to you for overcoming all of your weaknesses over the last 6 years of training. We'll see the fruits of that labor in a 1:48 FM by the end of this weekend, or have plans changed?
The plan is to keep rowing a lot of 1:48 @ 23-25 spm (11-12 SPI), steady state, HR at 155 bpm (75% HRR), until I can do it for a FM.
Sure, I think that should be soon, especially since I am now done teaching until September.
ranger
Last edited by ranger on April 21st, 2011, 6:32 pm, edited 2 times in total.
Rich Cureton M 72 5'11" 165 lbs. 2K pbs: 6:27.5 (hwt), 6:28 (lwt)
- Carl Watts
- Marathon Poster
- Posts: 4688
- Joined: January 8th, 2010, 4:35 pm
- Location: NEW ZEALAND
Re: Ranger's training thread
The current season ends on 1st May 2011.
This is an important message to let everyone know to check the date on there computer as it appears some people still have it set for 6 or 7 years ago.
This is an important message to let everyone know to check the date on there computer as it appears some people still have it set for 6 or 7 years ago.
Carl Watts.
Age:56 Weight: 108kg Height:183cm
Concept 2 Monitor Service Technician & indoor rower.
http://log.concept2.com/profile/863525/log
Age:56 Weight: 108kg Height:183cm
Concept 2 Monitor Service Technician & indoor rower.
http://log.concept2.com/profile/863525/log