You did it! Congratulations
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d0124/d0124cea67de00af01e030201a4b2a637f1a5a19" alt="Very Happy :D"
That makes me happySakly wrote: ↑November 27th, 2024, 5:14 pmCode: Select all
Time Meters Pace Watts Cal/Hr S/M 0:15.9 100m 1:19.5 697 2697 53
![]()
Thx fellas, makes me happy, tooDangerscouse wrote: ↑November 27th, 2024, 7:13 pmThat makes me happySakly wrote: ↑November 27th, 2024, 5:14 pmCode: Select all
Time Meters Pace Watts Cal/Hr S/M 0:15.9 100m 1:19.5 697 2697 53
![]()
![]()
Congratulations, although isf you are hitting 1:15's, I would have thought 15.8 or even 15.7 should be possibleSakly wrote: ↑November 27th, 2024, 5:14 pmCode: Select all
Time Meters Pace Watts Cal/Hr S/M 0:15.9 100m 1:19.5 697 2697 53
Probably you are thinking of several strokes at 1:15siain wrote: ↑November 28th, 2024, 4:36 amCongratulations, although isf you are hitting 1:15's, I would have thought 15.8 or even 15.7 should be possibleSakly wrote: ↑November 27th, 2024, 5:14 pmCode: Select all
Time Meters Pace Watts Cal/Hr S/M 0:15.9 100m 1:19.5 697 2697 53
![]()
Only 14 strokes? I think increasing that is where improvements will come as the fastest 100s have been done with 16 strokes in less time!
By my calculation getting that 3rd stroke to 1:22 would be enough to bring the time down to 15.8!
Encouraging to go again soon
Well that wasn't long coming! Well done Sascha - and on the 1:15 LP.Sakly wrote: ↑November 27th, 2024, 5:14 pmCode: Select all
Time Meters Pace Watts Cal/Hr S/M 0:15.9 100m 1:19.5 697 2697 53
![]()
Thx MikeMPx wrote: ↑November 28th, 2024, 8:59 amWell that wasn't long coming! Well done Sascha - and on the 1:15 LP.Sakly wrote: ↑November 27th, 2024, 5:14 pmCode: Select all
Time Meters Pace Watts Cal/Hr S/M 0:15.9 100m 1:19.5 697 2697 53
![]()
It does depend upon rating to some extent, 3 possibilities (or a combination) that come to mind:
Based on my own perception, I can say nothing of these options match. But if my perception is aligned with reality, that's the big guessiain wrote: ↑November 28th, 2024, 10:40 amIt does depend upon rating to some extent, 3 possibilities (or a combination) that come to mind:
1) Some people short slide the second stroke to get the fan moving. I just use a standalone PM3 so don't have stroke data except what I see while I am rowing, but my final part stroke is regularly 3-4S/500m quicker than the previous sprinted stroke as I throw my hands and body forward and use minimal slide to squeeze in an extra stroke. If you use this technique then lengthen stroke 3 to a full stroke, I can see that you might not be much faster on this 3rd stroke after the big gain on the second.
2) Stroke 3 may just have been a bad stroke in he rush to get it started, perhaps an early arm movement or arms not in line with chain so part of leg drive lost straightening the chain?
3) I find that in sprint repeats I take a couple to get used to the pace. 1:31 is a pace that you don't hit often, so perhaps you subconsciously "settled" for that after the second stroke and you didn't process that this was a 100 and so needed to be much faster until you were committed to a similar 3rd stroke. I know that my brain can sometimes take a stroke to process what is going on. So I have done a harder stroke because the digit I pay most attention to is showing a fall below where I want to be while being conscious that the digit before show I am above target (especially when starting off so haven't established the "feel" of the target pace.
Personally I have never set my fastest 100 on the first attempt in a session. Possibly insufficient warm up, but I also think it is ingraining what is required and 5 min passive rest later I am faster.
I have had this problem intermittently since I updated in the summer. Very hit and miss.nick rockliff wrote: ↑November 28th, 2024, 1:13 pmNo Ergdata though, latest update crashes it as soon as it connects to PM5.