quick question

7seat · Post by **7seat** » August 17th, 2006, 3:33 pm

If my best 2k ever is 6:55 what is a genereal number that I should aim for on a 6k test.

FrankJ · Post by **FrankJ** » August 17th, 2006, 5:12 pm

Hi 7seat,

We make an interesting comparison. I'm a lot older and little taller and heavier. Our short distance times are close but your 10K time is significantly slower than mine. Hard to predict between different individuals.

Frank

jbell · Post by **jbell** » August 17th, 2006, 7:53 pm

Your a bit bigger than me
180 6'2
vs
165 6
And our times are close (6:55 vs 6:54). Your 10k time is also slower than mine (never did one, but did 40min and did ~40100) so for your first one I'd go out at like a 1:58 or so. It also depends on what your pace is for the 6k (mine was 28, but not for the first one).

TomR · Post by **TomR** » August 17th, 2006, 8:35 pm

A Danish rowing physiologist has suggested the 6k should be 85% of 2k watts.

So if you row 6.56/311 watts, your 6k should be 264watts (1.50/500), resulting in a 22.00 min 6k.

So FrankJ shows excellent endurance--a little quicker on the 2k Frank--and jbell shows considerable power relative to endurance--work on the aerobic capacity lad.

Tom

jbell · Post by **jbell** » August 17th, 2006, 9:37 pm

Yea, I know. My endurence isnt what it should be. I'd like to be under 22min by the end of the fall. I've been working out a bit, so hopefully I can pull it off.