Pondering the Beginner Pete Plan
Re: Pondering the Beginner Pete Plan
After significant periods of inactivity, I find that my HR doesn't fit neatly into the "normal" bands. In particular I can get my HR up to 95% of maximum at modest perceived effort while when fairly fit, this would take a major effort and much longer time. I believe (sorry for the science bit for those who don't care about the "why") this is because my stroke volume drops and so my heart does less work in a beat. In addition the "threshold" beyond which oxygen debt accumulates can fall to as low as 75% of max that basically means any significant exercise is unsustainable longer term (think people incapable of climbing 4 flights of stairs without a rest). Personally I get through this by pushing well into AT at first. The BPP is structured with very modest targets for the earlier interval sessions so you don't need to be fully recovered for them at the suggested paces. So if you are still making rapid fitness gains nothing wrong with repeating the last couple of weeks at higher paces so that these can be continued for the longer distances along side harder intervals.
That said, 2:30 for someone of your weight is not at all bad. If you enjoyed the 6k, feel free to try and increase the pace, but if you are happy with this and don't like the discomfort of threshold rowing, nothing wrong with sticking to 2:30.
The key is that the plan is sustainable and enjoyable. If you were only doing the core 3 sessions, then the SS can be done a bit quicker as you have 48hrs to recover, while 5 sessions a week requires you to recover more quickly. The key is that you feel fresh for the interval sessions and want to do the sessions rather than drag yourself onto the erg.
Hope that makes some sense, but not all BPP participants have the same motivations, aims or wishes so there is no one answer!
That said, 2:30 for someone of your weight is not at all bad. If you enjoyed the 6k, feel free to try and increase the pace, but if you are happy with this and don't like the discomfort of threshold rowing, nothing wrong with sticking to 2:30.
The key is that the plan is sustainable and enjoyable. If you were only doing the core 3 sessions, then the SS can be done a bit quicker as you have 48hrs to recover, while 5 sessions a week requires you to recover more quickly. The key is that you feel fresh for the interval sessions and want to do the sessions rather than drag yourself onto the erg.
Hope that makes some sense, but not all BPP participants have the same motivations, aims or wishes so there is no one answer!
56, lightweight in pace and by gravity. Currently training 3-4 times a week after a break to slowly regain the pitiful fitness I achieved a few years ago. Free Spirit, come join us http://www.freespiritsrowing.com/forum/
-
- Marathon Poster
- Posts: 10523
- Joined: April 27th, 2014, 11:11 am
- Location: Liverpool, England
Re: Pondering the Beginner Pete Plan
It's easier said than done, especially as you've got some form of comparison starting in your head, but try to slow down to whatever pace is right for you, rather than the pace that you want it to be, and sometimes going slower is harder than going faster.Joris wrote: ↑November 18th, 2024, 9:47 amBy contrast, out of curiosity I rowed the 6k session today (week 7, day 4) at 2:20 splits. In doing so, I was probably in the AT zone (80-90% heart rate) for most of the time. I didn't feel completely exhausted after the session, but having a conversation wouldn't be possible either, so I suspect this is too fast for the steady state sessions and I better stick with the 2:30 pace?
Having a conversation is a great way of knowing if you're pace is correct, but it's also based on your recovery. Training the slower and longer sessions are mainly aiming to get you prepared for the shorter & faster sessions, assuming that you want to keep testing yourself and getting faster. As Iain mentions, not everyone is interested in that, so it's more about what your ideal goal looks like.
50 HWT; 6' 4"; 1k= 3:09; 2k= 6:36; 5k= 17:19; 6k= 20:47; 10k= 35:46 30mins= 8,488m 60mins= 16,618m HM= 1:16.47; FM= 2:40:41; 50k= 3:16:09; 100k= 7:52:44; 12hrs = 153km
"You reap what you row"
Instagram: stuwenman
"You reap what you row"
Instagram: stuwenman
Re: Pondering the Beginner Pete Plan
13.1 10000m – Again, try to improve on your average pace from the 10000m row last week. To ensure you are never in danger of not completing a session, set out at the same pace you achieved last time for the first three quarters or so of the row, and only then begin to speed up gradually.
Was focused more on keeping this as a UT2 workout that on pace.
Went out a couple seconds too fast again, forcing me to slow down a bit later...next time will see if I can start with a 2:26 pace and hold it....
Was focused more on keeping this as a UT2 workout that on pace.
Went out a couple seconds too fast again, forcing me to slow down a bit later...next time will see if I can start with a 2:26 pace and hold it....
Code: Select all
Time Meters Pace Watts Cal/Hr S/M HR
48:39.4 10,000m 2:25.9 113 687 19 137
9:34.3 2,000m 2:23.5 118 706 19 132
9:40.0 4,000m 2:25.0 115 695 19 139
9:46.9 6,000m 2:26.7 111 681 19 139
9:48.4 8,000m 2:27.1 110 678 19 138
9:49.9 10,000m 2:27.4 109 675 20 139
Re: Pondering the Beginner Pete Plan
Thanks for your answer.iain wrote: ↑November 18th, 2024, 1:28 pmThe key is that the plan is sustainable and enjoyable. If you were only doing the core 3 sessions, then the SS can be done a bit quicker as you have 48hrs to recover, while 5 sessions a week requires you to recover more quickly. The key is that you feel fresh for the interval sessions and want to do the sessions rather than drag yourself onto the erg.
I do all the sessions of the plan, ideally at five sessions a week, but if I don't get all the sessions done within the week I just pick up where I left off the following week.
And as you write, I try to mainly work hard at the interval sessions. And since, for now, it's still fairly easy to keep improving, the interval sessions are certainly still enjoyable.
You mean as a lightweight I have a disadvantage? I thought this would be the case mainly for short distances, but not necessarily so for longer distances?
I don't really mind the discomfort of being in the AT zone but I want to avoid having to take a step back because of fatigue symptoms.
Re: Pondering the Beginner Pete Plan
Yes, I like the aspect of keep testing myself and getting faster.Dangerscouse wrote: ↑November 18th, 2024, 4:29 pmTraining the slower and longer sessions are mainly aiming to get you prepared for the shorter & faster sessions, assuming that you want to keep testing yourself and getting faster. As Iain mentions, not everyone is interested in that, so it's more about what your ideal goal looks like.
But I'm also of the cautious type, so I don't want to pursue records blindly only to get quickly burned out afterwards.
After reading the above comments, I think my current intensities on both the steady state sessions and the interval sessions are fine and it's not a problem if the gap in split times between these type of sessions remains wide for the moment.
Re: Pondering the Beginner Pete Plan
BPP has relatively short distances compared with most rowing plans. I don't think that (in the absence of significant additional exercise or other limiting factors such as very poor nutrition or sleep) it risks over training. Just make sure that you take regular rest days. Larger people have more room for muscle and, as a power endurance sport, this makes a difference. The differences get lower as distances increase, but even over a Marathon heavy weights of equivalent fitness will be quicker. At 82% of the lightweight limit you are at a disadvantage to many lightweights in this regard although being taller than many lightweights will help (although extra neck length can be discounted and body length is a lot less helpful than longer arms & legs). There are many people who are rowing slower than you on this plan on the forum, so you don't need to worry too much and you are likely to getr significantly faster by the end of the plan.
As for fatigue, try it and see. If you find that you are not as quick or struggle more on the intervals, slow the SS a bit, otherwise you can continue at the higher pace!
As for fatigue, try it and see. If you find that you are not as quick or struggle more on the intervals, slow the SS a bit, otherwise you can continue at the higher pace!
56, lightweight in pace and by gravity. Currently training 3-4 times a week after a break to slowly regain the pitiful fitness I achieved a few years ago. Free Spirit, come join us http://www.freespiritsrowing.com/forum/
-
- Paddler
- Posts: 24
- Joined: November 4th, 2024, 1:58 am
Re: Pondering the Beginner Pete Plan
I agree with you! The BPP is not an intense plan - the Pete Plan can get intense and the Wolverine Plan is even more intense. In my opinion, as long as someone has an okay-ish base, and paces the BPP accurately, there should notbe any recovery days required as long as their nutrition, health and sleep are not poor.iain wrote: ↑November 19th, 2024, 12:33 pmBPP has relatively short distances compared with most rowing plans. I don't think that (in the absence of significant additional exercise or other limiting factors such as very poor nutrition or sleep) it risks over training. Just make sure that you take regular rest days. Larger people have more room for muscle and, as a power endurance sport, this makes a difference. The differences get lower as distances increase, but even over a Marathon heavy weights of equivalent fitness will be quicker. At 82% of the lightweight limit you are at a disadvantage to many lightweights in this regard although being taller than many lightweights will help (although extra neck length can be discounted and body length is a lot less helpful than longer arms & legs). There are many people who are rowing slower than you on this plan on the forum, so you don't need to worry too much and you are likely to getr significantly faster by the end of the plan.
As for fatigue, try it and see. If you find that you are not as quick or struggle more on the intervals, slow the SS a bit, otherwise you can continue at the higher pace!
Novice gains can be significant, especially in the first year. One can always progress faster than what the BPP recommends, but this should be taken cautiously to prevent burnout.
Week 3 Day 2: [2 x 2000m / 4min rest] – This will be the first time you’ve tried longer intervals with a reasonably long rest time. Not too dissimilar to the 5th sessions of weeks 1 and 2 if you attempted those, but the longer rest and slightly lower distance mean you can push the pace a little more. Still focus on technique and efficiency, but try to go about 2seconds faster pace than the 6000m session of a day or two ago.
9:04 at r24 and 9:04.x at r24, ~4 min rest. Pretty pleasantly surprised at my progress.
Week 3 Day 3: [6000m] – Again, aim for the same pace as your first 6000m session a few days ago. Don’t worry if these sessions feel harder some days and you don’t make your target. Many things can affect your performance from fatigue from previous sessions, to environmental conditions such as temperature, to hydration and nutrition. Any day you don’t perform so well, try to pinpoint anything you might have done differently, and note it down.
I aimed for 2:20.6 splits (~28:07x 6k) but subconsciously increased it to 2:19.8 (~27:58 6k) while maintaining decent-ish technique, and staying at r20. For almost all the session I could sing part of "Titanium" by Sia. Looping the same song is more effective for me than a playlist of many songs, as I know intuitively the more intense parts of the songs - which means even if I feel like I want to slack off, I dig in, hold on until the more intense part gives me more motivation.
Might as well relax and study for finals, but yeah... for Day 4 and 5 I will start conservatively and speed up later if comfortable, to avoid burnout. If I dig in harder while I am dehydrated and hungry, i can be ~2W/kg. Neither this nor my 6.4W-min stroke are great numbers, but any improvement is improvement.
When I am pretty hungry and dehydrated my weight is ~64kg but at that state my performance noticeably decreases. Exercising with a half full stomach is quite uncomfortable for me, so i exercise when a bit hungry. Any tips on getting it through? I obviously can't drink water during the erg sessions.
My technique is getting more natural. And if I hang in there for the entire BPP and make big gains, perhaps you can see this as a success story of only having ever rowed 2k before jumping directly into full BPP, and getting away with it. Only time will tell though.
18M 175 cm 66kg
Baseline before BPP - 23:02:x@r26-27 5k, 8:39:x@r28-29 2k, 1:59:x 500m@r32 (both NOT full effort)
Baseline after BPP -
Baseline before BPP - 23:02:x@r26-27 5k, 8:39:x@r28-29 2k, 1:59:x 500m@r32 (both NOT full effort)
Baseline after BPP -
Re: Pondering the Beginner Pete Plan
Welcome to the forum. I'm also a newbie and a similar age and lifestyle to you, albeit 5cm taller and 70lbs heavier! Currently on week 2.Joris wrote: ↑November 18th, 2024, 9:47 amBy contrast, out of curiosity I rowed the 6k session today (week 7, day 4) at 2:20 splits. In doing so, I was probably in the AT zone (80-90% heart rate) for most of the time. I didn't feel completely exhausted after the session, but having a conversation wouldn't be possible either, so I suspect this is too fast for the steady state sessions and I better stick with the 2:30 pace?
I think you have some answers already, but from what I've read you only really need to worry about UT zones if you are a semi-pro or higher training for hours every day. In that case you need to do active recovery while still getting metres rowed otherwise you will burn out and maybe get injured. For the rest of us doing 3-5 sessions a week of less than an hour, we have plenty of time to recover between sessions. In fact slightly harder may be better for us to get more bang for our buck and maximise training. But with the caveat of "listen to your body". If you are particularly tired or sore one day take the day off or go very gently. Try and ensure you are in top shape for the all-out interval sessions, but the rest of them can be as easy or hard (within reason) as you like as long as you can finish them and are excited for the next one.
I took the Pete Plan quite literally at first and tried to go super slow at about 2.30, but found it hard to stick to and ended up at 2.25. This may even fall a couple of seconds as my technique improves and I am rowing at about 20 strokes/min at a comfortable pace in the low 2.20s this week. If I went for a target I think my pace would completely drip off and I'd end with very unnatural pauses at the end of each stroke. That being said I am toying with the idea of mixing up the stroke rate with less energy in each stroke just to vary the strength Vs aerobic ratio and keep things interesting.
I'm still enjoying the targets in the BPP and the progress I'm making but having a busy week to fit in workouts. Actually finding myself a little obsessive - "when will I fit one in tomorrow if I don't do today?" lol I've never been this keen on getting fit in my life. Long may it continue
M 1982 6'1 205lbs
Re: Pondering the Beginner Pete Plan
Well done on the time improvements and sticking with it. Turning up is half the battle so anything else and you're winning.PleaseLockIn wrote: ↑November 20th, 2024, 10:41 amWhen I am pretty hungry and dehydrated my weight is ~64kg but at that state my performance noticeably decreases. Exercising with a half full stomach is quite uncomfortable for me, so i exercise when a bit hungry.
My technique is getting more natural. And if I hang in there for the entire BPP and make big gains, perhaps you can see this as a success story of only having ever rowed 2k before jumping directly into full BPP, and getting away with it. Only time will tell though.
I'm not sure I could listen to 1 song on a loop but it's an interesting idea. I have an upbeat, bass heavy mix I listen to for splits and an audiobook for SS. Currently listening to Atomic Habits by James Clear - hopefully it will sink in and I'll row everyday from here on in lol
I'm hoping my second interval run tomorrow will yield some improvement from last week as that will definitely help with motivation. I find they are the work outs I look forward to the most, and then (briefly) dread the most as I strap myself in!
Id definitely make sure you are well hydrated before starting a long run. Not as in chugging a pint and feeling sloshy, but just gently upping your intake for the hour or 2 before. Food shouldn't matter, but I hate exercising first thing on a completely empty stomach. It's too long after dinner. A few hours after breakfast or lunch is my preferred.
I'm also winging the BPP having never gone further than 2k before doing a couple of slow 3 and 4ks and then jumping into it last week. I think the ramp up should be fine. If you can do week 1, then you can do week 2 and so on.
M 1982 6'1 205lbs
Re: Pondering the Beginner Pete Plan
13.2 4 x 1000m / 3min rest – Slightly longer reps that the session in week 9 (or the optional session last week), but also the rest time is increased by a minute. Try to go for the same pace you managed in week 9, and your increased fitness should see you do a fast last rep!
Target 1:58.7 from week 9
This workout was a struggle from the first rep. Managed to hold the pace for the first 3, then completely blew up with 250m to go in the 4th interval. Had nothing left.
Target 1:58.7 from week 9
This workout was a struggle from the first rep. Managed to hold the pace for the first 3, then completely blew up with 250m to go in the 4th interval. Had nothing left.
Code: Select all
Time Meters Pace Watts Cal/Hr S/M HR
14:59.2 3,743m 2:00.1 202 995 27 174
3:57.1 1,000m 1:58.5 210 1022 27 172
r: 3:00 204m
3:57.1 1,000m 1:58.5 210 1022 28 175
r: 3:00 146m
3:57.4 1,000m 1:58.7 209 1020 29 177
r: 3:00 121m
3:07.6 744m 2:06.0 175 901 27 175
r471m