Pete Plan Thread

General discussion on Training. How to get better on your erg, how to use your erg to get better at another sport, or anything else about improving your abilities.
HowardF
2k Poster
Posts: 301
Joined: September 2nd, 2020, 10:30 am

Re: Pete Plan Thread

Post by HowardF » September 6th, 2020, 8:25 am

Hi
Did 30 mins yesterday and on every 5 mins 10-12 powerful strokes. Ended with 6696 meters ( 144 watts in average)
Today I had the target to be close to my upper limit of pulse zone 2 ( = 130) for 60 mins. Average heart rate was 127, watts = 124, SPM =17 and totally 12 720 meters.
As a newbe I have never done a 60 mins before. Yes, this was a new experience!
GOT BLISTER IN MY LEFT HAND!!!
So next week, just do some running. Then one week in the mountain for hunting and then we start on week 1 -BPP !
54 years, 183 cm, Norway

Polop
Paddler
Posts: 13
Joined: May 6th, 2020, 3:23 pm

Re: Pete Plan Thread

Post by Polop » September 7th, 2020, 2:11 pm

And 3 more weeks done on the Beginner Pete plan.

BPP Week 15:
- 10k: 2:17.3 @24spm
- 5 x 750m / 2min rest: 2:06.9 @26spm
- 3 x 10min / 2min rest: 2:14.8 @25spm

BPP Week 16:
- 10.5k: 2:19.0 @20spm (bad week: felt ill and crazy heat)
- 5 x 1500m / 3min rest: 2:12.9 @26spm
- 30min: 2:17.0@25spm

BPP Week 17:
- 10.5k: 2:17.3 @25spm
- 8 x 500m / 2min rest: 2:06.3 @27spm
- 2 x 15min / 2min rest: 2:14.7 @26spm

Been lazy on this 17th week by not adding any steady state session but still felt a lot better than the previous week.

Wouter
Paddler
Posts: 8
Joined: July 2nd, 2020, 1:16 pm

Re: Pete Plan Thread

Post by Wouter » September 8th, 2020, 4:39 am

BPP
week 12
10km 2:14,9 @21
4x1500m/3min r 2:03,8 @24
3x 10 min/2min r 2:08,7 @24
8km 2:16,0. @20
4x800/2min r 1:59,1 @26
Week 13
10km 2:13,8. @21
4x1000/3min r 1:59,5 @25
2x 15 min/ 2 min r 2:08,0 @22

I do have some doubts about the pace for the longer pieces. BPP does not mention steady state so I try to maintain the pace I did for the 5 km from week 1. That does raise my heart rate well beyond steady state. Also find it hard to row with a higher stroke rate (27 or higher) for the shorter distances. But perhaps that is just my insufficient fitness level.
M 1970, 1,85m 79kg

kklabunde
Paddler
Posts: 28
Joined: September 3rd, 2020, 5:15 pm

Re: Pete Plan Thread

Post by kklabunde » September 8th, 2020, 8:13 am

jenn wrote:
July 20th, 2020, 3:08 am
I found the Pete Plan Beginner 24 week page - and put it into a 1- page spreadsheet so I can print it out and cross things off -- https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/ ... sp=sharing
Love this...thank you! Just printed it off as I start week 1.
Kenneth
Indiana, USA
Forum Flyer
45yrs HWT M, 6'1"/215lbs: 500m=1:35.2; 4min=1,078m; 5000m=22:20.0; noob, work-in-progress

mjk
2k Poster
Posts: 220
Joined: September 5th, 2020, 3:24 am

Re: Pete Plan Thread

Post by mjk » September 9th, 2020, 11:10 pm

I feel like I’m kinda jumping into the middle of this pete plan thread, but I have a few questions. I’m not planning on following the pete plan exactly, but more browsing various training plans online for sources of inspiration.

First, in the pete plan document I see shared often, for the distance/endurance work, it says “I recommend a minimum of 22spm,”. Why is that stroke rate recommended? I often naturally fall to a 20spm on my steady state pieces.

Second, the plan includes multiple hard sessions, - speed intervals, endurance intervals, and the “hard distance piece”… That feels like a lot of “quality” work in a given week, do most people do all of those sessions in a week? After college rowing where I did a lot of hard sessions each week, I started recreationally running - and I liked the emphasis on easy volume and the idea of a weekly “long run” and have carried this into erging as I’ve gotten back into it after a running injury

Thanks
Wisconsin, USA. 30y/o M, 6'2", 220lbs
Post-collegiate PBs: 100m: 0:14.6, 500m: 1:19.9, 1000m: 2:55.0, 5000m: 16:20.5
Instagram: mjk1991

User avatar
max_ratcliffe
10k Poster
Posts: 1970
Joined: May 2nd, 2019, 11:01 pm

Re: Pete Plan Thread

Post by max_ratcliffe » September 9th, 2020, 11:50 pm

mjk wrote:
September 9th, 2020, 11:10 pm
I feel like I’m kinda jumping into the middle of this pete plan thread, but I have a few questions. I’m not planning on following the pete plan exactly, but more browsing various training plans online for sources of inspiration.

First, in the pete plan document I see shared often, for the distance/endurance work, it says “I recommend a minimum of 22spm,”. Why is that stroke rate recommended? I often naturally fall to a 20spm on my steady state pieces.

Second, the plan includes multiple hard sessions, - speed intervals, endurance intervals, and the “hard distance piece”… That feels like a lot of “quality” work in a given week, do most people do all of those sessions in a week? After college rowing where I did a lot of hard sessions each week, I started recreationally running - and I liked the emphasis on easy volume and the idea of a weekly “long run” and have carried this into erging as I’ve gotten back into it after a running injury

Thanks
The rate of 22 is just that Pete didn't like low rate stuff - I think he said as much somewhere where he mentions the Wolverine Plan and the L4 stuff therein.

The general consensus seems to be that PP is really a peaking programme and can't be run for a long time because of the intensity of the fast sessions. That said, some people are able to do cycle after cycle of the PP, while others intersperse a week of SS between the PP weeks.
51 HWT
PBs:
Rower 1'=329m; 500m=1:34.0; 1k=3:25:1; 2k=7:16.5; 5k=19:44; 6k=23:24; 30'=7582m; 10k=40.28; 60'=14621m; HM=1:27:46
SkiErg 1'=309m; 500m=1:40.3; 1k=3:35.3; 2k=7:35.5; 5k=20:18; 6k=24:35; 30'=7239m; 10k=42:09; 60'=14209m; HM=1:32:24

User avatar
hjs
Marathon Poster
Posts: 10076
Joined: March 16th, 2006, 3:18 pm
Location: Amstelveen the netherlands

Re: Pete Plan Thread

Post by hjs » September 10th, 2020, 4:55 am

max_ratcliffe wrote:
September 9th, 2020, 11:50 pm
mjk wrote:
September 9th, 2020, 11:10 pm
I feel like I’m kinda jumping into the middle of this pete plan thread, but I have a few questions. I’m not planning on following the pete plan exactly, but more browsing various training plans online for sources of inspiration.

First, in the pete plan document I see shared often, for the distance/endurance work, it says “I recommend a minimum of 22spm,”. Why is that stroke rate recommended? I often naturally fall to a 20spm on my steady state pieces.

Second, the plan includes multiple hard sessions, - speed intervals, endurance intervals, and the “hard distance piece”… That feels like a lot of “quality” work in a given week, do most people do all of those sessions in a week? After college rowing where I did a lot of hard sessions each week, I started recreationally running - and I liked the emphasis on easy volume and the idea of a weekly “long run” and have carried this into erging as I’ve gotten back into it after a running injury

Thanks
The rate of 22 is just that Pete didn't like low rate stuff - I think he said as much somewhere where he mentions the Wolverine Plan and the L4 stuff therein.

The general consensus seems to be that PP is really a peaking programme and can't be run for a long time because of the intensity of the fast sessions. That said, some people are able to do cycle after cycle of the PP, while others intersperse a week of SS between the PP weeks.
Pete did not do low rate training, but still pulled a 1.46 30min/rate 20 Pb. Showing that its not so much a power session but more endurance.

User avatar
max_ratcliffe
10k Poster
Posts: 1970
Joined: May 2nd, 2019, 11:01 pm

Re: Pete Plan Thread

Post by max_ratcliffe » September 10th, 2020, 7:38 am

hjs wrote:
September 10th, 2020, 4:55 am
max_ratcliffe wrote:
September 9th, 2020, 11:50 pm
mjk wrote:
September 9th, 2020, 11:10 pm
I feel like I’m kinda jumping into the middle of this pete plan thread, but I have a few questions. I’m not planning on following the pete plan exactly, but more browsing various training plans online for sources of inspiration.

First, in the pete plan document I see shared often, for the distance/endurance work, it says “I recommend a minimum of 22spm,”. Why is that stroke rate recommended? I often naturally fall to a 20spm on my steady state pieces.
<>

Thanks
The rate of 22 is just that Pete didn't like low rate stuff - I think he said as much somewhere where he mentions the Wolverine Plan and the L4 stuff therein.

The general consensus seems to be that PP is really a peaking programme and can't be run for a long time because of the intensity of the fast sessions. That said, some people are able to do cycle after cycle of the PP, while others intersperse a week of SS between the PP weeks.
Pete did not do low rate training, but still pulled a 1.46 30min/rate 20 Pb. Showing that its not so much a power session but more endurance.
This also shows there's no substitute for talent. I doubt I could do five strokes at that SPI.
Perhaps I need to train myself to do 13SPI and then make outlandish claims about pulling 6.16 as a 60yo LWT... :lol:
51 HWT
PBs:
Rower 1'=329m; 500m=1:34.0; 1k=3:25:1; 2k=7:16.5; 5k=19:44; 6k=23:24; 30'=7582m; 10k=40.28; 60'=14621m; HM=1:27:46
SkiErg 1'=309m; 500m=1:40.3; 1k=3:35.3; 2k=7:35.5; 5k=20:18; 6k=24:35; 30'=7239m; 10k=42:09; 60'=14209m; HM=1:32:24

User avatar
hjs
Marathon Poster
Posts: 10076
Joined: March 16th, 2006, 3:18 pm
Location: Amstelveen the netherlands

Re: Pete Plan Thread

Post by hjs » September 10th, 2020, 9:34 am

max_ratcliffe wrote:
September 10th, 2020, 7:38 am


This also shows there's no substitute for talent. I doubt I could do five strokes at that SPI.
Perhaps I need to train myself to do 13SPI and then make outlandish claims about pulling 6.16 as a 60yo LWT... :lol:
:D

Pete was/is member of the Mad team, one of the first teams that trained very seriously on the erg. Those guys stimulated each other a lot. Including guys like Nick Flemming and Graham Benton. Pete with his 6.10 2k was by far not one of the fastest members.

Pdscout
Paddler
Posts: 16
Joined: April 26th, 2020, 12:59 am

Re: Pete Plan Thread

Post by Pdscout » September 18th, 2020, 5:18 pm

Polop wrote:
September 7th, 2020, 2:11 pm
And 3 more weeks done on the Beginner Pete plan.

BPP Week 15:
- 10k: 2:17.3 @24spm
- 5 x 750m / 2min rest: 2:06.9 @26spm
- 3 x 10min / 2min rest: 2:14.8 @25spm

BPP Week 16:
- 10.5k: 2:19.0 @20spm (bad week: felt ill and crazy heat)
- 5 x 1500m / 3min rest: 2:12.9 @26spm
- 30min: 2:17.0@25spm

BPP Week 17:
- 10.5k: 2:17.3 @25spm
- 8 x 500m / 2min rest: 2:06.3 @27spm
- 2 x 15min / 2min rest: 2:14.7 @26spm

Been lazy on this 17th week by not adding any steady state session but still felt a lot better than the previous week.
Nice !
So after ~3 weeks break I returned but decided to first do some 10 k pieces to get back
week15
10k 2:07.6 ( previous best 2:06.8)
5x750m rest 2min 1:51.2
1:50.3@27
1:49.9@27
1:50.3@27
1:50.9@27
1:54.6 @26
3x10min rest 2min 2:06.0
2:06.7@23
2:06.4@24
2:04.8@24
Week 16
10,5k 2:07.0 @24
5x1,5k rest 4 min 1:59.6
2:01.1@23
2:01.1@24
2:00.9@24
1:58.2@25
1:56.9@25

30min tomorrow

I still like the program but 5 times a week would be to much for me. Anyway my main target is build endurance and train at home if climbing isn't possible.
BR
Pascal
34y Male 185cm 88kg
Image

mjk
2k Poster
Posts: 220
Joined: September 5th, 2020, 3:24 am

Re: Pete Plan Thread

Post by mjk » September 25th, 2020, 12:07 am

max_ratcliffe wrote:
September 10th, 2020, 7:38 am
hjs wrote:
September 10th, 2020, 4:55 am
max_ratcliffe wrote:
September 9th, 2020, 11:50 pm


The rate of 22 is just that Pete didn't like low rate stuff - I think he said as much somewhere where he mentions the Wolverine Plan and the L4 stuff therein.

The general consensus seems to be that PP is really a peaking programme and can't be run for a long time because of the intensity of the fast sessions. That said, some people are able to do cycle after cycle of the PP, while others intersperse a week of SS between the PP weeks.
Pete did not do low rate training, but still pulled a 1.46 30min/rate 20 Pb. Showing that its not so much a power session but more endurance.
This also shows there's no substitute for talent. I doubt I could do five strokes at that SPI.
Perhaps I need to train myself to do 13SPI and then make outlandish claims about pulling 6.16 as a 60yo LWT... :lol:
Interesting discussion, thanks for the feedback. Especially interesting that the PP is considered a peaking program - I could see how that much hard work could be beneficial for a short period of time - but only after months of base building.

Also interesting to note the comment that mentioned the MAD team - I hadnt heard about them. It was interesting to look them up and learn a little more about them
Wisconsin, USA. 30y/o M, 6'2", 220lbs
Post-collegiate PBs: 100m: 0:14.6, 500m: 1:19.9, 1000m: 2:55.0, 5000m: 16:20.5
Instagram: mjk1991

faach1
SpamTeam
Posts: 426
Joined: April 25th, 2020, 6:40 am
Location: United Kingdom
Contact:

Re: Pete Plan Thread

Post by faach1 » September 30th, 2020, 2:11 pm

Will be starting a plan based off of PP, guess I’ll post some insights here??
Freddie Hancock

MAD Team IRC

2k: 6:22.6 (Somerset VIRC)

faach1
SpamTeam
Posts: 426
Joined: April 25th, 2020, 6:40 am
Location: United Kingdom
Contact:

Re: Pete Plan Thread

Post by faach1 » October 4th, 2020, 1:16 pm

Yesterday, did the PP sprint pyramid for the first time, 1:51 average, last 250m was an absolute killer, average HR 145
Freddie Hancock

MAD Team IRC

2k: 6:22.6 (Somerset VIRC)

rascott
1k Poster
Posts: 174
Joined: January 29th, 2018, 11:04 am
Location: UK

Re: Pete Plan Thread

Post by rascott » October 15th, 2020, 9:12 am

aftre completing the BPP about 2 years ago and having a few go's at the full PP I'm back for another attempt. I'd like to try and stick with it for the rest of the year with a view to getting my 2k time improved. I think my technique and fitness has improved so I've decided to pick up where I left off last time i did the PP (April'19) and just use those averages as my targets for the intervals. .Anyway, here's my first session....

Image

target was 1:54.1 based on the last time i did it (April 2019)

Hoping to stick with it this time!
Robert | 51 | 6'1 | 97 kg (214 lbs)
1 min: 300m; 1K - 3:33; 2K - 7:19; 5K - 19:22.7; 6k - 23:29; 30mins - 7315m; 10K - 40:06; 60mins: 14623m; HM: 1:35:14
Started C2 rowing Nov 2017 but rowed OTW in my youth

rascott
1k Poster
Posts: 174
Joined: January 29th, 2018, 11:04 am
Location: UK

Re: Pete Plan Thread

Post by rascott » October 20th, 2020, 7:08 am

PP 1.5 - hard distance. Decided to go for a 5K PB - got it by 8 seconds. Onwards and upwards

Image
Robert | 51 | 6'1 | 97 kg (214 lbs)
1 min: 300m; 1K - 3:33; 2K - 7:19; 5K - 19:22.7; 6k - 23:29; 30mins - 7315m; 10K - 40:06; 60mins: 14623m; HM: 1:35:14
Started C2 rowing Nov 2017 but rowed OTW in my youth

Post Reply