Training Zones and HR
Training Zones and HR
Hi... I know this will have been addressed many times
But during this exceptional period many appear to be taking their training more seriously
There seems to be conflicting advice out there.. Even within the C2 site.
UT2 for example in the long training guide V2 gives the HR <70%... Which I believe to be correct.. I appreciate there will be caveats
Yet within the site and elsewhere (more readily available) the use of HRR or working HR.
This can give a difference of ~15bpm placing the athlete in a completely different Zone
Thoughs
But during this exceptional period many appear to be taking their training more seriously
There seems to be conflicting advice out there.. Even within the C2 site.
UT2 for example in the long training guide V2 gives the HR <70%... Which I believe to be correct.. I appreciate there will be caveats
Yet within the site and elsewhere (more readily available) the use of HRR or working HR.
This can give a difference of ~15bpm placing the athlete in a completely different Zone
Thoughs
-
- Marathon Poster
- Posts: 10973
- Joined: April 27th, 2014, 11:11 am
- Location: Liverpool, England
Re: Training Zones and HR
There is a lot of conflicting advice, not least as I have heard people using 72% and 75% as the upper limit of UT2
I generally work off 70% but it's a loose target as I accept that it's not an exact science, and it's always going to be a best guess. Imo, it's best to not get too caught up with exact details as there are too many variables at play.
I generally work off 70% but it's a loose target as I accept that it's not an exact science, and it's always going to be a best guess. Imo, it's best to not get too caught up with exact details as there are too many variables at play.
51 HWT; 6' 4"; 1k= 3:09; 2k= 6:36; 5k= 17:19; 6k= 20:47; 10k= 35:46 30mins= 8,488m 60mins= 16,618m HM= 1:16.47; FM= 2:40:41; 50k= 3:16:09; 100k= 7:52:44; 12hrs = 153km
"You reap what you row"
Instagram: stuwenman
"You reap what you row"
Instagram: stuwenman
-
- Half Marathon Poster
- Posts: 3921
- Joined: August 9th, 2019, 9:35 am
- Location: England
Re: Training Zones and HR
One thing I was told was if you're going to train in zones try and keep it consistent within the zone rather than push it to within say 3bpm of max for that zone. I was doing that to start with as my ego wants me to push for a faster split time. I have now tried to decouple Eddie the Ego from my slower training sessions to avoid that. I try and stay at circa 65% for Blue zone and 75% for Green zone base on my HR using a chest strap. I cover the monitor sometimes too and just leave SR and HR visible.
6'2" 52yo
Alex
Recent 2k - 7:19
All time 2k - 6:50.2 (LW)
Alex
Recent 2k - 7:19
All time 2k - 6:50.2 (LW)
- jackarabit
- Marathon Poster
- Posts: 5838
- Joined: June 14th, 2014, 9:51 am
Re: Training Zones and HR
=/<RHR+.7HRR is traditional. Thoughs.
There are two types of people in this world: Those who can extrapolate from incomplete data
M_77_5'-7"_156lb

M_77_5'-7"_156lb

Re: Training Zones and HR
What advice do you need? Rowing is very simple: go fast at low ratings in training, and faster still when racing at high ratings.There seems to be conflicting advice out there.. Even within the C2 site.
If you can go sufficiently fast at low ratings, you may well see HR going to unexpected places. This is due to AT shift, and means you have trained well and are ready to race if you want to.
08-1940, 179cm, 75kg post-op (3 bp).
Re: Training Zones and HR
Hello,jamesg wrote: ↑May 22nd, 2020, 1:11 amWhat advice do you need? Rowing is very simple: go fast at low ratings in training, and faster still when racing at high ratings.There seems to be conflicting advice out there.. Even within the C2 site.
If you can go sufficiently fast at low ratings, you may well see HR going to unexpected places. This is due to AT shift, and means you have trained well and are ready to race if you want to.
That may have happened to me once, my very first 2k race in my early 40s, I was very excited, my HR went to 205 and I was concerned it was too fast and I might bust a gasket somewhere. I felt fine but worried, backed off & came in at 7:10. Coach later explained to me that I shouldn't be too concerned about max HR and 220 rule.
Is that the sort of thing you are talking about or have I completely misunderstood you ?
Bill
Bill
(6+ million metres on rowing machine all my PBs were long ago)
(6+ million metres on rowing machine all my PBs were long ago)
- hjs
- Marathon Poster
- Posts: 10076
- Joined: March 16th, 2006, 3:18 pm
- Location: Amstelveen the netherlands
Re: Training Zones and HR
Or heart is build to last a century, non stop, there is a build in break, a high hf is nothing to worry about. Always training at a high hf is a different matter, thats simply not the way to go. But racing and seeing a very high hf is 100% fine.Bill wrote: ↑May 31st, 2020, 7:21 amHello,jamesg wrote: ↑May 22nd, 2020, 1:11 amWhat advice do you need? Rowing is very simple: go fast at low ratings in training, and faster still when racing at high ratings.There seems to be conflicting advice out there.. Even within the C2 site.
If you can go sufficiently fast at low ratings, you may well see HR going to unexpected places. This is due to AT shift, and means you have trained well and are ready to race if you want to.
That may have happened to me once, my very first 2k race in my early 40s, I was very excited, my HR went to 205 and I was concerned it was too fast and I might bust a gasket somewhere. I felt fine but worried, backed off & came in at 7:10. Coach later explained to me that I shouldn't be too concerned about max HR and 220 rule.
Is that the sort of thing you are talking about or have I completely misunderstood you ?
Bill
Re: Training Zones and HR
Yes. In Conconi HR theory, AT was to be found by experiment (step test), and it could drift with training, moving towards MHR. This could be exactly what you saw.Is that the sort of thing you are talking about?
08-1940, 179cm, 75kg post-op (3 bp).