Ungamable C2 settings for a Tabata workout?
Ungamable C2 settings for a Tabata workout?
Hi there. Hoping for some help. I seem to train hardest when competing against my own previous performances. I'm also a terrible gamesman, and will try to game any training workout I create for myself.
I would like assistance in setting up a C2 workout which I can use for Tabata training (ie 8 rounds of 20 seconds of high intensity exercise interspaced with 10 second rest periods).
I would like a workout that produces a "score" I can use to push myself during each workout and compare my performances over time.
The hurdle I cannot currently surmount is the fact the C2 machine "rewards" maintaining momentum through the rest periods - ie, in every workout I can come up with, I would get better scores (total distance , calories burnt etc) if I rowed at more of a consistent speed throughout rather than completely resting in the 10 second rest periods. That is to say, the benefit of Tabata appears to be the acceleration it demands, and yet I cannot determine a workout that encourages this acceleration.
Is there a metric on the PM5 that measures or incorporates a measure of acceleration?
Thanks a lot for any help.
I would like assistance in setting up a C2 workout which I can use for Tabata training (ie 8 rounds of 20 seconds of high intensity exercise interspaced with 10 second rest periods).
I would like a workout that produces a "score" I can use to push myself during each workout and compare my performances over time.
The hurdle I cannot currently surmount is the fact the C2 machine "rewards" maintaining momentum through the rest periods - ie, in every workout I can come up with, I would get better scores (total distance , calories burnt etc) if I rowed at more of a consistent speed throughout rather than completely resting in the 10 second rest periods. That is to say, the benefit of Tabata appears to be the acceleration it demands, and yet I cannot determine a workout that encourages this acceleration.
Is there a metric on the PM5 that measures or incorporates a measure of acceleration?
Thanks a lot for any help.
-
- 6k Poster
- Posts: 901
- Joined: November 18th, 2008, 11:21 pm
Re: Ungamable C2 settings for a Tabata workout?
Your question does not make any sense to me.
What you do in the rest period doesn't retroactively change the score of the workbout interval you did beforehand. The only "reward," as you put, it is that you can get the flywheel moving during the recovery and start a bit faster on the subsequent interval, but that is easily remedied by just not taking strokes during the rest and starting each interval from a dead stop.
The erg measures power, in watts, that is all. There is no measure of acceleration, momentum, or any other physics quantity that you may think of. The split you see on the screen is derived from the power, in watts, that you're generating by spinning the flywheel.
What you do in the rest period doesn't retroactively change the score of the workbout interval you did beforehand. The only "reward," as you put, it is that you can get the flywheel moving during the recovery and start a bit faster on the subsequent interval, but that is easily remedied by just not taking strokes during the rest and starting each interval from a dead stop.
The erg measures power, in watts, that is all. There is no measure of acceleration, momentum, or any other physics quantity that you may think of. The split you see on the screen is derived from the power, in watts, that you're generating by spinning the flywheel.
PBs: 2k 6:09.0 (2020), 6k 19:38.9 (2020), 10k 33:55.5 (2019), 60' 17,014m (2018), HM 1:13:27.5 (2019)
Old PBs: LP 1:09.9 (~2010), 100m 16.1 (~2010), 500m 1:26.7 (~2010), 1k 3:07.0 (~2010)
Old PBs: LP 1:09.9 (~2010), 100m 16.1 (~2010), 500m 1:26.7 (~2010), 1k 3:07.0 (~2010)
Re: Ungamable C2 settings for a Tabata workout?
Yes, what I was trying to solve was to stop the temptation of carrying on rowing through the breaks.
It's frustrating that the PM5 can't produce a numerical metric for acceleration - the data's all there, and being processed for some similarly complicated metrics (such as average speed, average spm etc).
It's frustrating that the PM5 can't produce a numerical metric for acceleration - the data's all there, and being processed for some similarly complicated metrics (such as average speed, average spm etc).
Re: Ungamable C2 settings for a Tabata workout?
Actually scratch that. Subject to testing, I think I might have a workable solution.
Not sure what the minimum interval times are, but I think something like this could work:-
Interval 1 - 20s
Interval 2 - 10s
Interval 3 - 20s
Interval 4 - 10s
...
Interval 15 - 20s
Record wattage/split/distance for each interval, add up odd numbered intervals, and subtract even numbered intervals.
Not sure what the minimum interval times are, but I think something like this could work:-
Interval 1 - 20s
Interval 2 - 10s
Interval 3 - 20s
Interval 4 - 10s
...
Interval 15 - 20s
Record wattage/split/distance for each interval, add up odd numbered intervals, and subtract even numbered intervals.
Re: Ungamable C2 settings for a Tabata workout?
Lol!! i remember when i first got into the sport and watched this bloke on youtube doing it but he clearly wasn't giving his all in the reps.. so i thought hmmm i'll have a go at that it looks like fun and great way to burn off a stack of calories fast!!
3 reps in and those 10 seconds started to feel like 1 and by 5 i was wrecked
As said, do em properly and you'll know about it alright.
Pretty sure you can get a jump head start on the flywheel at 4 seconds on the rest count periodsdata:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b42cc/b42ccda18bb862c094527d03e18229d42f9787b1" alt="Idea :idea:"
3 reps in and those 10 seconds started to feel like 1 and by 5 i was wrecked
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/25e03/25e03b2b634d40034aa2b33fa2c3e74fb0fcdf36" alt="Laughing :lol:"
As said, do em properly and you'll know about it alright.
Pretty sure you can get a jump head start on the flywheel at 4 seconds on the rest count periods
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b42cc/b42ccda18bb862c094527d03e18229d42f9787b1" alt="Idea :idea:"
46 yo male 5'10 88kg (Rowing since june 9th 2016) PB's 5k 19:22 30min 7518m
-
- 6k Poster
- Posts: 901
- Joined: November 18th, 2008, 11:21 pm
Re: Ungamable C2 settings for a Tabata workout?
The erg already records the split/watts for every interval you do, there's no need to do any calculations on your own. The splits you pull during the rest aren't factored into the actual work intervals.Garnett wrote:/snip
Record wattage/split/distance for each interval, add up odd numbered intervals, and subtract even numbered intervals.
Again, I'm jut not understanding what your question/issue is. I also don't understand your need for acceleration - I can't think of a single exercise machine that gives acceleration as a measurement. Not a treadmill, not a stationary bike, not an elliptical, not an erg.
PBs: 2k 6:09.0 (2020), 6k 19:38.9 (2020), 10k 33:55.5 (2019), 60' 17,014m (2018), HM 1:13:27.5 (2019)
Old PBs: LP 1:09.9 (~2010), 100m 16.1 (~2010), 500m 1:26.7 (~2010), 1k 3:07.0 (~2010)
Old PBs: LP 1:09.9 (~2010), 100m 16.1 (~2010), 500m 1:26.7 (~2010), 1k 3:07.0 (~2010)
Re: Ungamable C2 settings for a Tabata workout?
Yeah, it sounds like a few other fans of Tabata have suffered itsa effects. Christ it's horrible.
You are not supposed to continue exercising in those 10 second rest periods.
If you stop rowing altogether in the rest periods, the erg will be harder to get up to speed at the start of the next round of exercise.
If you continue to row in that time, you keep the flywheel going I think.
Therefore, in most workouts I could think of, your eventual score would be better if you "gamed" the workout, and continued rowing in your rests.
I wanted to come up with a workout that couldn't be gamed in that way.
If I set up a workout with 15 intervals (ie set up the rest times as intervals and not "rest") then actually deduct any "score" in each of them, it will have the effect of actualy penalising me for continuing to row.
Tabata is 8 rounds of 20 seconds of maximum effort with 10 seconds of rest in between.ArmandoChavezUNC wrote:Again, I'm jut not understanding what your question/issue is. I also don't understand your need for acceleration - I can't think of a single exercise machine that gives acceleration as a measurement. Not a treadmill, not a stationary bike, not an elliptical, not an erg.
You are not supposed to continue exercising in those 10 second rest periods.
If you stop rowing altogether in the rest periods, the erg will be harder to get up to speed at the start of the next round of exercise.
If you continue to row in that time, you keep the flywheel going I think.
Therefore, in most workouts I could think of, your eventual score would be better if you "gamed" the workout, and continued rowing in your rests.
I wanted to come up with a workout that couldn't be gamed in that way.
If I set up a workout with 15 intervals (ie set up the rest times as intervals and not "rest") then actually deduct any "score" in each of them, it will have the effect of actualy penalising me for continuing to row.
Re: Ungamable C2 settings for a Tabata workout?
Just start each interval correctly from a standing start once the rest times elapsed!! Then just re-row the session later and try and improve on it... seems straight forward enough to me that way. Unless i'm missing something?
46 yo male 5'10 88kg (Rowing since june 9th 2016) PB's 5k 19:22 30min 7518m
Re: Ungamable C2 settings for a Tabata workout?
You're missing my propensity to try and game any workout!Anth_F wrote:Just start each interval correctly from a standing start once the rest times elapsed!! Then just re-row the session later and try and improve on it... seems straight forward enough to me that way. Unless i'm missing something?
Re: Ungamable C2 settings for a Tabata workout?
Garnett wrote:You're missing my propensity to try and game any workout!Anth_F wrote:Just start each interval correctly from a standing start once the rest times elapsed!! Then just re-row the session later and try and improve on it... seems straight forward enough to me that way. Unless i'm missing something?
You said this in your initial post lol "I would like a workout that produces a "score" I can use to push myself during each workout and compare my performances over time"
Score with the erg = to time/pace!! So once you know where you are at with these factors from the sessions, then you can push yourself and know where you need to be, and can compare over time.
46 yo male 5'10 88kg (Rowing since june 9th 2016) PB's 5k 19:22 30min 7518m
Re: Ungamable C2 settings for a Tabata workout?
Think we might be talking at cross-purposes, but I'm all sorted now. Thanks for the input all!
-
- 6k Poster
- Posts: 887
- Joined: March 20th, 2016, 12:00 am
Re: Ungamable C2 settings for a Tabata workout?
Tabata is a load of bollocks and not worth worrying yourself over.
If you want to do intervals just do 1 min on / 1 min off for 20 minutes or 8x500m with 2' rest. If you want to train power do the peak power test and subsequent training workouts.
The tabata protocol was for elite cyclists. To exact power levels for work and rest. Done to absolutely max effort. And there was plenty of steady work included too. And it was shown to be not that effective compared to the control group who just did steady work.
It isn't just 8 x 20"/10" of anything ...on the erg that is just a fairly useless interval workout that will not give you enough time to do more than a handful of strokes, and not enough time to let the flywheel slow down between rounds. Maybe three easy strokes of rest.
If you want to do intervals just do 1 min on / 1 min off for 20 minutes or 8x500m with 2' rest. If you want to train power do the peak power test and subsequent training workouts.
The tabata protocol was for elite cyclists. To exact power levels for work and rest. Done to absolutely max effort. And there was plenty of steady work included too. And it was shown to be not that effective compared to the control group who just did steady work.
It isn't just 8 x 20"/10" of anything ...on the erg that is just a fairly useless interval workout that will not give you enough time to do more than a handful of strokes, and not enough time to let the flywheel slow down between rounds. Maybe three easy strokes of rest.
Male, 35, 5'10", 78kg
Started rowing Feb 2016
500m 1:33.2
2000m 6:57.4
5000m 18:47.6
Started rowing Feb 2016
500m 1:33.2
2000m 6:57.4
5000m 18:47.6
Re: Ungamable C2 settings for a Tabata workout?
That's disappointing to read. Could you link to some sources?aussieluke wrote:It was shown to be not that effective compared to the control group who just did steady work.
- Citroen
- SpamTeam
- Posts: 8052
- Joined: March 16th, 2006, 3:28 pm
- Location: A small cave in deepest darkest Basingstoke, UK
Re: Ungamable C2 settings for a Tabata workout?
I should probably edit that for language (how about "poppycock and balderdash" or "hogwash") to avoid upsetting the sensibilities of the overly sensitive folks who read this forum. But it's so funny it can stay. Say it how it is, don't hold back.aussieluke wrote:Tabata is a load of bollocks and not worth worrying yourself over.
-
- 6k Poster
- Posts: 887
- Joined: March 20th, 2016, 12:00 am
Re: Ungamable C2 settings for a Tabata workout?
Good article about it here:Garnett wrote:That's disappointing to read. Could you link to some sources?aussieluke wrote:It was shown to be not that effective compared to the control group who just did steady work.
https://www.readpt.com/talking-tabata/
He does suggest a rower is a possible option but I think in practice you'd find it isn't, for the reasons I listed above.
Male, 35, 5'10", 78kg
Started rowing Feb 2016
500m 1:33.2
2000m 6:57.4
5000m 18:47.6
Started rowing Feb 2016
500m 1:33.2
2000m 6:57.4
5000m 18:47.6