Question about HR

General discussion on Training. How to get better on your erg, how to use your erg to get better at another sport, or anything else about improving your abilities.
Post Reply
User avatar
teddyDK
1k Poster
Posts: 159
Joined: October 9th, 2015, 7:15 am

Question about HR

Post by teddyDK » December 31st, 2016, 9:56 am

One of My Weekly workouts is 5 x 3' // 3' and normally its rating is around 26-28. Today i did it at r30 because im really bad at high rating. My 2k rating is only around 29. But my pulse was 4-10 higher than normal at that pace. Is that normal or should i stay with the lower rating?

gooseflight
2k Poster
Posts: 256
Joined: April 2nd, 2006, 3:53 am
Location: Scotland

Re: Question about HR

Post by gooseflight » December 31st, 2016, 10:21 am

Slightly depends on the aim of the session, but in general it's better to rate lower for a given pace. Your HR is higher because there is less recovery between strokes. Rating higher increases CV stress.
Roy Walter
M55 | 185cm | 90kg | Journeyman Erger
PBs (2004): 6:38 (2K) | 5:22.9 (mile) | 17:39.6 (5K) | 8323 (30 mins) | 36:52 (10K) | 1:22:03 (HM '05)

User avatar
teddyDK
1k Poster
Posts: 159
Joined: October 9th, 2015, 7:15 am

Re: Question about HR

Post by teddyDK » December 31st, 2016, 10:45 am

gooseflight wrote:Slightly depends on the aim of the session, but in general it's better to rate lower for a given pace. Your HR is higher because there is less recovery between strokes. Rating higher increases CV stress.
I have seen the Danish rower where i train recommend pretty High rating and i indoor training guide TR training is 28-32 rating.

G-dub
Half Marathon Poster
Posts: 3215
Joined: September 27th, 2014, 12:52 pm
Location: Asheville, NC

Re: Question about HR

Post by G-dub » December 31st, 2016, 10:55 am

Sometimes HR can be different day to day due to hydration or sleep or booze the night before. Or you could have been more focused on it - sometimes mine can go up or down just by staring at it. Or you might have not been relaxed enough on the recovery due to being at a higher rate and maybe you were tense about it. Or as Goose says, you were going up and down the slide more often. Keep experimenting.
Glenn Walters: 5'-8" X 192 lbs. Bday 01/09/1962
Image

User avatar
teddyDK
1k Poster
Posts: 159
Joined: October 9th, 2015, 7:15 am

Re: Question about HR

Post by teddyDK » December 31st, 2016, 10:57 am

G-dub wrote:Sometimes HR can be different day to day due to hydration or sleep or booze the night before. Or you could have been more focused on it - sometimes mine can go up or down just by staring at it. Or you might have not been relaxed enough on the recovery due to being at a higher rate and maybe you were tense about it. Or as Goose says, you were going up and down the slide more often. Keep experimenting.
Thanks.

I May just track My HR next time at My phone. So i cant watch i all the time.

Happy new year.

gooseflight
2k Poster
Posts: 256
Joined: April 2nd, 2006, 3:53 am
Location: Scotland

Re: Question about HR

Post by gooseflight » December 31st, 2016, 11:01 am

teddyDK wrote:
gooseflight wrote:Slightly depends on the aim of the session, but in general it's better to rate lower for a given pace. Your HR is higher because there is less recovery between strokes. Rating higher increases CV stress.
I have seen the Danish rower where i train recommend pretty High rating and i indoor training guide TR training is 28-32 rating.
Nothing wrong with rating high if that's the aim. Shorter interval sessions tend to be [2K] race pace (or faster) and race rate.
Roy Walter
M55 | 185cm | 90kg | Journeyman Erger
PBs (2004): 6:38 (2K) | 5:22.9 (mile) | 17:39.6 (5K) | 8323 (30 mins) | 36:52 (10K) | 1:22:03 (HM '05)

G-dub
Half Marathon Poster
Posts: 3215
Joined: September 27th, 2014, 12:52 pm
Location: Asheville, NC

Re: Question about HR

Post by G-dub » December 31st, 2016, 11:04 am

I have been experimenting with higher rates on some interval workouts and I think it is important to come back to the catch softly to save energy. When going higher rate it is easy to put wasted energy into getting back to the catch since you have to do it a hair faster.
Glenn Walters: 5'-8" X 192 lbs. Bday 01/09/1962
Image

User avatar
teddyDK
1k Poster
Posts: 159
Joined: October 9th, 2015, 7:15 am

Re: Question about HR

Post by teddyDK » January 1st, 2017, 2:54 pm

gooseflight wrote:
teddyDK wrote:
gooseflight wrote:Slightly depends on the aim of the session, but in general it's better to rate lower for a given pace. Your HR is higher because there is less recovery between strokes. Rating higher increases CV stress.
I have seen the Danish rower where i train recommend pretty High rating and i indoor training guide TR training is 28-32 rating.
Nothing wrong with rating high if that's the aim. Shorter interval sessions tend to be [2K] race pace (or faster) and race rate.
The indoor training guide says TR training is rated 28-32 and 80-105% 2k

Post Reply