Basic training questions

General discussion on Training. How to get better on your erg, how to use your erg to get better at another sport, or anything else about improving your abilities.
User avatar
Galeere
6k Poster
Posts: 832
Joined: April 19th, 2015, 3:49 am

Re: Basic training questions

Post by Galeere » October 20th, 2015, 4:37 pm

ergo sum wrote: 11 o'clock means 30 degrees toward the fan from a vertical sitting position, right?
Yes, IMO it is less at the catch (at the forward position) and it´s a little more at the end of the drive leaning backwards but probably also less than 30 degrees - look at the vids, but everybody does it a little differently (I have seen angles higher than 30 degrees at the end of the drive) but leaning forward (with a straight back) and backward (with a straight back) is part of the idea (and the force of the drive).
Does this mean I cannot rely on the rowing machine to exert myself at 100% my capacity like a crazy man the whole time, until the future time I get better which likely will take weeks, or is there something I can add to the training routine to get the incredibly vigorous output I have become psychologically addicted to doing daily and accomplish the two things?
At the beginning I misunderstood the concept of erg training as well: You go fast/really fast only 20% (or 30% at the most) of total training volume. Body needs rest, your aerobic system needs training and that training is done at relative low intensities but high volumes. Myself for example on a good day went sub 7min on 2.000meters. Even if I could I would not want to do such a painful and streneous effort on a daily, weekly or monthly basis. Training is often boring, long stretches with relatively low speed. Again, you don´t want to train your anerobic system only but you want to build upon a strong aerobic system, meaning training intensities at or below 80% of max heart rate reserve (meaning 80% x (HR max - HR rest) + HR rest). Only twice, maybe three times a week you go faster but not for very long stretches.
Is what I do in the video likely to result in injury, or is the comment more general. I didn't feel it was an issue, but profess ignorance and just want to understand. Do you think not rocking my back toward the fan enough is what I've conditioned myself to do to avoid injury and that at higher rates with good form injury would be more likely as the back and arms assume more load?
My comment was meant in general and there are naturals who never seem subject to hurt themselves due to good genes or something alike. Myself I can tell you this story: I never hurt myself on the erg, even going at damper 10, but 5 weeks ago wanted to train with some guys utilizing row pro (an online rowing software, where you can meet other ergateers and row against each other). As those rows are scheduled I missed most part of my usual warm up and it was the first day in my training cellar where it was fairly cold. It was a 30min-race so I started with splits at 1:53ish. No good, it resulted in a badly mangled upper part of the musculus obliquus externus abdominis. Hurting for weeks now, quite a bit of trouble for respiration during training etc. etc. So it can happen anytime and higher drags / higher forces imply higher risks. Good technique and lower drags and proper warm-ups lower the risk.
Generally, I am wondering. My situation so far has made my respiration the limit to my best times, with all the faults the form clearly has. Looking at my build, and considering I have exceptionally good oxygen intake for at least 20 minutes which rowing has really made the difference, if I get good form will respiration likely be the limit of time or will fatigued muscles be the limit? At the moment my limit is clearly respiration.
For me the shortfall isn´t respiration but cardio (reaching max HR) and/or general fatigue due to induced lactate acid at speeds above anaerobic treshhold (AT). On long rows (10k and above) it´s the depletion of glycogen reservoirs and general muscle fatigue. Maybe that´s different from type to type and training status to training status. The important thing is that you can overload your respiration system and anything else with lower drags and lower SPM by trying to use a full stroke (all muscles, legs, arms and back) and the corresponding force during the whole stroke. Before that and all in all it´s better to go a little slower to improve on technique and train your aerobic system and move to anaerobic training later on (the training of the aerobic system takes much longer, years, while the anaerobic system is brought to speed within a few weeks).
Image

Edward4492
10k Poster
Posts: 1615
Joined: March 7th, 2014, 11:34 pm

Re: Basic training questions

Post by Edward4492 » October 20th, 2015, 5:07 pm

ergo,

A couple of things. First of all, your cardio fitness must be excellent for you to pull 1:57 for 5k, I can't possibly conceive doing it at a 190 df. I can't conceive pulling 34-36r for 20 minutes. Breaking 20min for a 50-59LWT is a very good time. As I mentioned, we're the same age and weight (you're considerably lighter actually). I've pulled 15k at a 20r at just under 2:00 pace. I can relatively easily pull 5k at 20r and sub 2:00. And I do it on a 93df. And since you mentioned your weak arms, I've done legs only rows at around a 30r and low drag for 1000m.

What's the point of all this? If you look at those numbers it should be obvious that if you and me are doing the same times (let's say 20 minutes for 5k) and we're similar age and weight. If you're doing it at 34r and I'm doing it at a 20r.....who's putting out more power for each stroke? And.....doing so against a much,much lighter resistance! You need to get your technique ironed out, and when you do you have the fitness to put up some very fast times. When I row at a 20r, I think of each stroke as an explosion. I rock forward at the hips, get up on the balls of my feet, and drive out of the catch, enough to feel a slight lightening of my weight on the seat and hang on the handle as I drive it back (I think this is what the rowing coaches call hanging off your skeleton). Jim Gratten used the term "locked and loaded" to describe the feeling when you're ready to pop out of the catch. I don't believe you have the time to get set up the way you're currently rowing.

The problem with the high rates and very low power out put is.....you got no place to go! As you are currently rowing at 34-36r, to get down to a 7:00 2k you would have to up your rate into the 50's. Won't happen. I've just started to do some higher rate rowing, (8) x500m at 1:50 and a 30r. If add a little more power I can (hopefully) get that down to 1:45. Then rate up a bit to 32 and I'm in the low 1:40's which is pretty much terminal velocity for me. And I carry pretty much the same stroke that I developed at the lower rates. Just a faster recovery to raise the rate. And of course this needs to be trained. It doesn't happen by itself. Next time you row, look at your average watts. Then divide by your stroke rate.on the slow stuff I'm at 10 watts/stroke. I can't do it right now, but my goal is to carry that to the higher rates. 20r at 200w, then 30r at 300w which equals a 7:00 2k. What's your watts per stroke?

So, if I were coaching you we'd put that damper down on #1. We would do a lot of legs only drills to get that "pop" going. And we would slow things down. It will come. Like I said, I gotta believe you're extremely fit. I think there's huge potential there once you get it sorted out.

User avatar
ergo sum
Paddler
Posts: 22
Joined: October 17th, 2015, 12:07 am
Location: Florida USA

Re: Basic training questions

Post by ergo sum » October 21st, 2015, 1:30 am

Hardy and Edward; Jack; Henry,

Thanks for coaching me in each of your kind comments. Hardy and Edward you were both extremely helpful to put yourselves in my shoes and address in detail the exact thoughts going through my mind and that is giving me more confidence and understanding I needed, and explaining it in an understandable way. To be honest it feels like a long ways to unlearn my system, and the comments on aerobic exercise and training goals is something I've approached unconventionally and that is why I rowed myself into a great aerobic condition right until I hit a brick wall on time improvement due to misapplication of force as my body displaces back. Jack, the video was helpful, more helpful for my questions were the other two posted by the same Aussies on her rowing intensely and common rowing errors. The C2 girl must have the monitor tampered with :D to row so smoothly down to 1:50 at what 23 s/m? Unbelievable. Is she like 190 cm (6'3") tall? Her behind travels so far back on the rail, I'm getting serious rail envy and wondering if my short butt-slide distance is a big handicap. Henry, Thanks again for clearing up everything from before and the good luck which is nice of you. I'm a bit sad after all this to learn I won't be having the elevated feeling I have been getting after each daily row when I've done a daily time-trial race. I actually became addicted to doing that. But I am listening to what you say and will follow the recommendations you've given especially getting the hip and knee bend sooner which was a problem today to coordinate.

Today I went for my row and put into practice as much as I could.
1. I tried: df = 110, knee vertical in catch, lower stroke rate, and straightening back more.
2. I failed to find a rhythm with the knee vertical and it was a nuisance to be stopping early and losing power. I could not maintain the low rate and quickly raised it to 32 s/m to not have a stinky performance. Straightening the back was not as easy as it looked in the videos and I need to find a new groove. My knees were sore for the first time ever.
3. I succeeded in seeing that the performance can be had with the lower df and even with stroke rate and have an idea how to start re-learning the movement. My hip does not engage forward nearly as soon as it should.
My results were a flat 20 minute row at 2:02.8, and the last 4 minutes was actually at 2:02.6, which is a first for me to speed up at the end and actually the s/m dropped to 31 in those last 4 min so maybe there's hope :) , and at the time felt like I could have easily gone to 30 minutes, but later felt the soreness. I felt none of the elated feeling of mind and body as before. I was breathing normally pretty much stepping off the rower and did not hit even the 80% target heart zone during the row, but my arms were fatigued somewhat. The whole thing felt very different - like a mild session on a treadmill which I take to cool down after rowing. I'm sure this is because of the hybrid movements mess/transition. I couldn't lock the energy into the drive I needed this time. On a positive note, the thumping against my stomach with the handle problem I had before vanished, and my wrists didn't break there any more.

It's a bad place to be but a necessary link I hope I get over quickly. I am going to follow the advice tomorrow to go strapless and use the force curve on the PM4 like in Hardy's earlier video link, and coaches, I will do a lot next time at a df around 75. I'll just force it to be a stroke rate of around 23, which is very hard to adapt to. Speaking of Elvis Jack, I bet he'd have been a natural for the proper hip motion.
Image

jamesg
Marathon Poster
Posts: 4275
Joined: March 18th, 2006, 3:44 am
Location: Trentino Italy

Re: Basic training questions

Post by jamesg » October 21st, 2015, 3:13 am

I'm a bit sad after all this to learn I won't be having the elevated feeling I have been getting after each daily run when I've done a daily time-trial race. I actually became addicted to doing that.
You will, with better technique, but at a somewhat lower rating. This will leave you room to go faster by increasing the rating when you really want to. That elevated feeling (endorphines) will then be replaced by a feeling of total exhaustion. Welcome to rowing.

The recovery sequence, arms away, then swing, then slide, is the first essential. This will help you pull a longer stroke with more work in it, by getting you to a better posture at the catch: shoulders well forward, shins vertical, weight on your feet.

Low drag, low feet and low rating will give you the geometry and the time to learn to do this; but high ratings make it impossible to learn.

The backstop drill helps with this too: to warm up, row with arms only for a minute or so, then add swing again for a minute, then start to use the slide (after the swing forward). Typically we see 60 spm 60W, then 40/100W then 20/150W during this warm-up. The rating drops but power increases as we call into action more of our muscle.

Your first goal will be to produce the same amount of power that you've already seen in your 5k, but at rate 25-30.

Note that the erg is a piece of engineering, and if we want to see good numbers we have to use engineering ideas. The main one here is that Work = Length x Force; so producing a lot of work is best done by using length, because using force makes us tired before time. Work (and not force) is what stresses your CV system, and you have a large one: use it.

You can keep an eye on what you are doing by watching the Watt/Rating ratio. I think you can reach a ratio of 7 (now it's about 5) quite easily, though the exact number will depend on your height. This is important: in rowing we can only pull one stroke at a time, so it better be a good one. Boats and flywheels don't stop between strokes, but they know what we did in the last one.
08-1940, 179cm, 75kg post-op (3 bp January 2025).

User avatar
hjs
Marathon Poster
Posts: 10076
Joined: March 16th, 2006, 3:18 pm
Location: Amstelveen the netherlands

Re: Basic training questions

Post by hjs » October 21st, 2015, 4:09 am

I'm a bit sad after all this to learn I won't be having the elevated feeling I have been getting after each daily run when I've done a daily time-trial race. I actually became addicted to doing that.
You can get back to that pretty soon, but ofcourse you can,t improve day after day, so this approach will make you hit al wall big time...
Say you improve 1 second per session, 5 days a week. In a year 250 seconds. Over 4 minutes, way below the current Wr for you.....

But there are all kind of ways you can improve. Lots of other sessions. Short, long, interval, rate restricted. Strapped undstrapped etc etc.

And if you keep on looking your pace you will keep on doing wrong things. Forget pace, stop doing 20 min sessions every day. 100% focus on your stroke. It will be massively rewarding if you get that fixed. And in the end it will make you faster op top.

Re 75 drag, thats overdoing it, most people can,t move fast enough for such low resistance, you really have to rip the chain with low rate to catch the fast spinning fan.

Bob S.
Marathon Poster
Posts: 5142
Joined: March 16th, 2006, 12:00 pm

Re: Basic training questions

Post by Bob S. » October 21st, 2015, 2:51 pm

ergo sum wrote: I am going to follow the advice tomorrow to go strapless and use the force curve on the PM4 like in Hardy's earlier video link, and coaches, I will do a lot next time at a df around 75. I'll just force it to be a stroke rate of around 23, which is very hard to adapt to.
DF 75 is a bit extreme, but I guess that it doesn't hurt to experiment. One big word of caution about going strapless - on the first try, use a very low stroke rate. Even 23 is a tad high. Once you get the feel of it and have the confidence that you won't go flying off the back of the seat at the finish of the drive, then you can gradually increase the stroke rate. A lot of ergers, even those who regularly row without straps, will go back to using straps when they intend to get up over 30 spm or even in the high 20s.

If you have a problem trying to keep the stroke rate down, concentrate on using a long, slow, relaxed recovery to get ready for that quick, hard drive. At this stage of the game, you don't need to be concerned about your times. For now, you need to learn to get the most out of each stroke. Then you can work on doing more of those strokes per minute to build up your speed. As an extreme example of low rate, OTW rowers do what is called a pause drill. They stop the recovery at the point where the hands have passed the knees and just hold it there to see how well the boat balances and how long a run they can get out of each stroke. No point of this on the indoor rower, of course, but continuous rates as low as 12 spm are not uncommon. I regularly use 12 spm for warm ups and cool downs. I stick to the clock on those and start the drive when the monitor clock hits zero or five. At that stroke rate, I do not try to go at a fast pace. I try to keep the work done per stroke as close as I can to what it would be at any other stroke rate. In other words, if I could put out 200 watts at 20 spm, I would only want to put out 120 watts at 12 spm. On the flip side, I would need to put out 300 watts at 30 spm. (Note: These numbers are illustrative only and are far beyond my dreams nowadays.)

User avatar
ergo sum
Paddler
Posts: 22
Joined: October 17th, 2015, 12:07 am
Location: Florida USA

Re: Basic training questions

Post by ergo sum » October 22nd, 2015, 1:55 am

James, Henry & Bob,

Just in time for me to change things before I went rowing today. I'm really following all your tips to the best of my ability to what you all have to say. Wish I could read Dutch better than by machine translation, since Henry has a great website. I just saw his lightning record time for 2K there and I can imagine the fan heating up the room at that erg rate, great emphasis on nutrition and philosophy of life. That record is comfortably over 400 Watts, enough power to fly a human powered airplane for the entire duration of the row -- if someone would lend you a plane! I just wanted to say to each and every one of you who is sending me tips how much I appreciate them.
Lots of other sessions. Short, long, interval, rate restricted. Strapped unstrapped etc etc. ... ... And if you keep on looking your pace you will keep on doing wrong things. Forget pace, stop doing 20 min sessions every day. 100% focus on your stroke. It will be massively rewarding if you get that fixed. ... ... Re 75 drag, that's overdoing it,
DF 75 is a bit extreme, but I guess that it doesn't hurt to experiment. One big word of caution about going strapless - on the first try, use a very low stroke rate. Even 23 is a tad high. Once you get the feel of it and have the confidence that you won't go flying off the back of the seat at the finish of the drive, then you can gradually increase the stroke rate... ... I try to keep the work done per stroke as close as I can to what it would be at any other stroke rate.
Low drag, low feet and low rating will give you the geometry and the time to learn to do this; but high ratings make it impossible to learn... ... to warm up, row with arms only for a minute or so, then add swing again for a minute, then start to use the slide (after the swing forward). Typically we see 60 spm 60W, then 40/100W then 20/150W during this warm-up. The rating drops but power increases as we call into action more of our muscle.
For now, you need to learn to get the most out of each stroke. Then you can work on doing more of those strokes per minute to build up your speed.
The main one here is that Work = Length x Force; so producing a lot of work is best done by using length,


I tried to listen to everyone, and especially the hardest which was Henry telling me to forget my 20 minute workout that I had carved before in stone with my fingernails as standard.
Today: df = 110. all rowing done unstrapped.

First, a pre-program in the timer of nine 1:40 rows with mostly 20 second breaks as the suggested^^^ "warm-up drill". The entire 15 minutes of those rows was was spent: in triplet alternation 1) arms only 2) arms and back swing only, 3) complete cycle ... repeat two more times. Rate was 25 overall for those drills. I had difficulty counting the watts per stroke as I was too busy concentrating on the movement and posture. Overall Watts were a joke: 80W, but I did my best to develop better posture and coordination.

Second, I rowed two intervals of two minutes each as practice to get an idea and noticed I would push over the target 24 rate and was always having to hold back from old habit, strapped or on this occasion, no straps. 26 rate, 2:06 splits 175 W (6.7 Watt:rate ratio). ((old output under bad form now is goal to regain as suggested, it was 215 W for 20 minutes at rate = 30 @ consistently better than 1:58 split = 7.2 Watts:rate ratio))

Finally I set it for 2 minute intervals with 10 sec rests (I put down handle each rest and started next interval), and did eleven 2 minute intervals. I used the drive force integral graph or whatever that graph is called that shows the power over a single stroke drive. It was triangular shaped with the high point slightly before half of the wave. I continuously worked on getting the peak earlier and holding it flatter than letting it fade quickly and be low for a long portion in the last third. Is this best? It is more energy*distance, as the above advice quoted^^^. I had better hip swing, but still did not connect directly to the drive as my old bad pre-forum form would always connect. No knee problems, but my abs are "black and blue" beaten up from yesterday, I discovered. Apparently the force I hit my stomach on a few times was enough to make my abs discolored and sore, so now I have no choice but not to hit them much with the handle. My 22:00 (2X11) average split and meters were all almost identical. I couldn't hold 24r, but am getting better at that. I averaged very close to 27r for all of them. Watts were 172W. Ratio W:r = 6.4 Split 2:06.6 (474 m). :oops: :cry: :oops:

I realized after reading Henry's webpage I am probably addicted to the endorphins as mentioned by James, and these are likely produced by going "AN" with heart rate and respiration in my old way of rowing for 5-10 or even 15 minutes without stopping causing that feeling. Now the arms are entirely too fatigued from incorrect timing in part I think, to get reasonable heart rates... but I can do 2:00 splits for periods sometimes and it was random so there is a lot of poor form to overcome. Arms were tired in a different way and getting off the rower I was breathing normally almost immediately, without cool down. Any further comments you guys want to throw my way? I'm going to keep on this course you all helped me chart, so if there's something you see, just let me know. Until I can connect for a better drive I don't think I'll see 1:56 for a long time and it is frustrating because I don't get my Heart rate up enough yet, just much more arm fatigue. Thanks. 215W/25r = 8.6W:r, long way to go to get back.
Image

User avatar
hjs
Marathon Poster
Posts: 10076
Joined: March 16th, 2006, 3:18 pm
Location: Amstelveen the netherlands

Re: Basic training questions

Post by hjs » October 22nd, 2015, 4:04 am

Cheers ergo, our times are all relative, we all are somewhere in the big piramide with 5.36 on top.
Fast rowers do a 5k sub 1.30, the fm was done this in year in 1.42 and very strong people pull close to 1.02 during a max sprint. Also don,t forget weight/height. Rowers are big, there you are not in front with your build.

Re 20 min. Thats just around the corner, you really seem to have gotten a habbit :wink:

It went a bit better, try to focus one one thing at the time, changing up 3/4 things at once is very tough, but you will a lot of change in 1/2 weeks.

Forget your pace, it will come, you loose nothing fitnesswise.

Re bruises, just touch the lower abs, no slamming, certainly nothing to give you bruises.

Also, training at lower rating will not reach the same speed as racing free rate. Strapless the same thing. So don,t look at that, focus on getting a full strong stroke. The moment you do strap in and use free rate shows how fast you really are.

Te connection. At high drag the fan moves slow, so nomatter what you always have connection right away. Lower drag needs much more timing and legspeed. That will come.

Also rowing is a endurence sport, longer session should be beyond 20 min.

KenS
Paddler
Posts: 29
Joined: October 3rd, 2014, 9:55 pm
Location: Strasburg, VA

Re: Basic training questions

Post by KenS » October 22nd, 2015, 6:43 am

Erg, lots of great advice from these very wise gentlemen. I'm built much like you (skinny arms from years of cycling and about 70kg). I hope other contributors to this discussion will excuse me for posting the following video again (I posted it in another discussion some months ago), but it was the single best piece of advice I found on technique. I spent some weeks using a very low drag factor while staring at the force curve on my PM as I rowed. It really helped me hone my technique so that I started using my legs more effectively:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hiQ0Mql ... _hIW2lGbxD
2017-2018 Season Bests
Image
Age: 64 Height: 183cm Weight: 71kg

User avatar
Galeere
6k Poster
Posts: 832
Joined: April 19th, 2015, 3:49 am

Re: Basic training questions

Post by Galeere » October 22nd, 2015, 7:21 am

KenS wrote:Erg, lots of great advice from these very wise gentlemen. I'm built much like you (skinny arms from years of cycling and about 70kg). I hope other contributors to this discussion will excuse me for posting the following video again (I posted it in another discussion some months ago), but it was the single best piece of advice I found on technique. I spent some weeks using a very low drag factor while staring at the force curve on my PM as I rowed. It really helped me hone my technique so that I started using my legs more effectively:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hiQ0Mql ... _hIW2lGbxD
Thats the Dreissigacker-vid posted already in this thread. I learned a lot from it as well.
More on the issue of the force curve found in the net, for example here: http://biorow.com/RBN_en_2001_files/200 ... News12.pdf
Here a vid of myself going at various (increasing) SPM-rates. Got some critique regarding my back which should be straighter. But it might illustrate how the speed of the drive stays pretty much the same while it is the recovery that gets faster (and sloppier) the higher the SPM goes: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UklsG-X4uu4
Image

KenS
Paddler
Posts: 29
Joined: October 3rd, 2014, 9:55 pm
Location: Strasburg, VA

Re: Basic training questions

Post by KenS » October 22nd, 2015, 7:58 am

Galeere wrote:
Thats the Dreissigacker-vid posted already in this thread. I learned a lot from it as well.
More on the issue of the force curve found in the net, for example here: http://biorow.com/RBN_en_2001_files/200 ... News12.pdf
Oops, sorry for duplicating the link.
2017-2018 Season Bests
Image
Age: 64 Height: 183cm Weight: 71kg

Bob S.
Marathon Poster
Posts: 5142
Joined: March 16th, 2006, 12:00 pm

Re: Basic training questions

Post by Bob S. » October 22nd, 2015, 1:24 pm

ergo sum wrote: No knee problems, but my abs are "black and blue" beaten up from yesterday, I discovered. Apparently the force I hit my stomach on a few times was enough to make my abs discolored and sore, so now I have no choice but not to hit them much with the handle.
Time another big WHOA! The abs are too low a target, especially the lower abs, which you mention later in that post. The sternum is the correct ending for the drive and, in any case, you don't actually touch the torso with the handle. The handle should move in that little downward curl just short of the torso.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AOPQbP8hFmY

I would be in big trouble if I pounded my sternum the way you appear to be pounding your abs. It would probably mess up the wires that were put in to hold it together.

Bob S.

User avatar
ergo sum
Paddler
Posts: 22
Joined: October 17th, 2015, 12:07 am
Location: Florida USA

Re: Basic training questions

Post by ergo sum » October 23rd, 2015, 1:59 am

Henry, Hardy, Bob, thanks for sticking with me! Ken, no problem, I didn't realize it was the same video Hardy posted until it played and it was well worth being made to watch again (but...see comment below)! Any random further comments would be welcome. I'm trying to listen and do what you all recommend in detail and forget about my past. Can't stop saying but you guys have been fantastic for my health!
Forget your pace, it will come, you loose nothing fitnesswise. Re bruises, just touch the lower abs, no slamming, certainly nothing to give you bruises.
More on the issue of the force curve found in the net, for example here: http://biorow.com/RBN_en_2001_files/200 ... News12.pdf
Here a vid of myself going at various (increasing) SPM-rates. Got some critique regarding my back which should be straighter. But it might illustrate how the speed of the drive stays pretty much the same while it is the recovery that gets faster (and sloppier) the higher the SPM goes: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UklsG-X4uu4
WHOA! The abs are too low a target, especially the lower abs, which you mention later in that post. The sternum is the correct ending for the drive and, in any case, you don't actually touch the torso with the handle. The handle should move in that little downward curl just short of the torso. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AOPQbP8hFmY I would be in big trouble if I pounded my sternum the way you appear to be pounding your abs. It would probably mess up the wires that were put in to hold it together.
Erg, lots of great advice from these very wise gentlemen. I'm built much like you (skinny arms from years of cycling and about 70kg)
Today's rowing (all df = 110, all unstrapped), more limb/ still some knee stress to work out; stepped off machine and breathing still returns immediately normal so I hope I'll improve a little better before hitting my natural correct level:
Warm-up 5:00 =>1:40X3 zero rest = continuous row: piece 1 = arm (19W 25r), piece 2 = arm + back (39W 23r), piece 3 = all (136W 26r)
Workout 24:00 => 4:00X6 zero rest = continuous row:
Overall 24:00 5777m 181W 25r (7.2W:r) 2:04.6
piece 1 4:00 959m 179W 27r (6.6W:r) 2:05.1
piece 2 4:00 953m 175W 26r (6.7W:r) 2:05.9
piece 3 4:00 954m 176W 25r (7.0W:r) 2:05.7
piece 4 4:00 960m 179W 25r (7.2W:r) 2:05.0
piece 5 4:00 975m 188W 26r (7.2W:r) 2:03.0
piece 6 4:00 980m 191W 26r (7.3W:r) 2:02.4

Bruises... and many surprises lessons learned: Thanks for the cautions! They were the middle abs bruised two days ago.
What I learned: This problem is avoided in my case completely by the following change: Previously, feet were higher in the foot pads (Is their a recommendation for foot position?), Before, four open hole rows were above and the shoe length was rubber pegged in the 5th row. Changed to 3rd row (two open hole rows), lowering unstrapped feet. Fixed another problem unexpectedly: It was much easier to catch in vertical knee-ankle alignment instead of running knees forward and seat hitting ankle sometimes (so no more ankle callouses either). Also helped keep foot flatter rather than being on ball of foot. Handle now comes in front of upper abs, an inch under sternum (about 2 inches under nipple level, which is 1 - 1.5 inch under Lindsay's recommendation).

Locking body into power: Not feeling the lock as I would like, but Henry's comments have me relieved about this subject, so I'm not worried as much anymore since it improved at the same df. Cheers Henry, and thanks for teaching me your attitude, because I was in what we call tunnel-vision until you directed me to forget about things and not worry about the monitor splits. Today I rowed without them on the screen at all!

Posture & CONCERN: Getting a little better with fluid hip swing returning before catch, my biggest failure before. Posture is more erect spine now and butt is rocking and helping position for drive greatly. BIG CONCERN: I have low body fat and lean that I feel I need to put something on the seat to prevent too much pressure on soft tissue leading to the family jewels (men - you know what I'm talking about, right?) What can be done to protect this area which by my new form is receiving pressure in the leaning toward fan, "sitting square and tall" back position?

Force-time PM4 curve: Hardy, great Video of you ... very helpful. Thank you. I thought about it today in my intervals when making slight adjustments. The other bio-link looks pretty interesting and is a treasure trove of formulas, but doesn't address my question about the ideal shape of the curve for me. On further reflection, this question is not important to me until I row more. So far I estimate I have rowed 700,000m all in unorthodoxed and inefficient form. I am going to seek my natural curve while maintaining good form, and use the graph just to avoid any major problems at this point. The 'Dreissigacker' video is interesting to get familiar with looking at the graph, but unless I'm missing something, I'm not sure what he is doing is good for me at this point in my training and it seems more experience is needed and it shouldn't be used in a general sense, but rather one should first learn what least stresses their limbs using a generally good form and I now know there are many acceptable forms done by different rowers and not all are as efficient but they are still competitive anyway. My curve is single, relatively smooth peaked now and not much jerk anywhere. My take away is simply work on flattening the peak at a higher average. Just speaking for myself and welcome opinions, as I understand I do not have the experience to judge in my own context. Not yet.

PM4 Monitor: I do not understand how this monitor is so advanced that it could probably be programmed to warm a coffee pot to the right temperature, but :idea: the 'Force-time curve, upon completion, does not display the area under the curve until the next stroke is finished. Can someone please tell C2 to fix this? Maybe I'm wrong and the Watts digital display gives this, but I am under the impression that the measures differ. That is why you all suggest I take the ratio of W:r, which is clunky and not something to see on the fly. The Monitor should just give the work under the curve. Directly in Joules! They already calculate calories... Why the oversight?

Bob, the woman in the video you posted unfortunately talks a lot and barely rows anything so it was hard for me to get a fix on her form. But she clearly makes the point about her method of pulling and smoothing the "corners" of the linear motion upon reaching the torso and reversing direction, which is good food for thought. Ouch, wire holding together the rib cage. My Dad had staples. In his case we were pretty sure that all was safe after a year, and 2-3 years later, we felt the natural fusion of living bone tissue is actually stronger that regular bone. You are amazing to have not allowed that to get in the way of your rowing!

As usual, any comments are encouraged and very much appreciated and I thank you gentlemen for all your time! :)
Image

Bob S.
Marathon Poster
Posts: 5142
Joined: March 16th, 2006, 12:00 pm

Re: Basic training questions

Post by Bob S. » October 23rd, 2015, 8:10 pm

ergo sum wrote: PM4 Monitor: I do not understand how this monitor is so advanced that it could probably be programmed to warm a coffee pot to the right temperature, but :idea: the 'Force-time curve, upon completion, does not display the area under the curve until the next stroke is finished. Can someone please tell C2 to fix this? Maybe I'm wrong and the Watts digital display gives this, but I am under the impression that the measures differ. That is why you all suggest I take the ratio of W:r, which is clunky and not something to see on the fly. The Monitor should just give the work under the curve. Directly in Joules! They already calculate calories... Why the oversight?

Bob, the woman in the video you posted unfortunately talks a lot and barely rows anything so it was hard for me to get a fix on her form. But she clearly makes the point about her method of pulling and smoothing the "corners" of the linear motion upon reaching the torso and reversing direction, which is good food for thought. Ouch, wire holding together the rib cage. My Dad had staples. In his case we were pretty sure that all was safe after a year, and 2-3 years later, we felt the natural fusion of living bone tissue is actually stronger that regular bone. You are amazing to have not allowed that to get in the way of your rowing!
Re the monitor: I have a feeling that there is little interest in those sort of details amongst the majority of the Concept 2 indoor rower users. The active members of this forum constitute only a tiny fraction of that group and are not at all typical. The forum has more than its share of number freaks (like me) for one thing. I agree that the W:r ratio is clunky. The division of watts by strokes per minute gives you a result that has the units "watt-minutes per stroke". Work expressed in watt-minutes is basically OK and not unprecedented (think kilowatt-hours as used for car batteries), but it is still unconventional. It can be abbreviated neatly to W', but the apostrophe indicating minute is very easily lost in the process, so it is an awkward alternative, despite its brevity. If you multiply watt-minutes by 60 seconds per minute, then you come out with watt-seconds, more properly called joules, and it is more familiar territory. So my puny 5.0 W'/stroke can be expressed at 300 joules per stroke, which sounds more impressive - out of context. But when it is compared to the normal range of 600-1000 j/stroke of most members, it shows that puny was the right adjective to use.

Re the Calorie count on the monitor: Have you ever checked the Calories per hour against the wattage? There is supposed to be a simple linear relationship, right? It turns out that it doesn't come out that way. The monitor throws in an additional factor of 4 to account for the 25% efficiency of the human body viewed as a heat engine and adds an extra 300 Calories per hour to account for work you do that is not done to the wheel. That work is mostly the acceleration and deceleration of your body up and down the slide.

Re the Angela Hart rowing video: The setting of that was a class of Crossfit training instructors. I believe that she was in charge of the rowing aspects of the CF program.

(Long break here. I was interrupted this morning in the middle of this and didn't get back to it until late in the afternoon.)

My point in posting that link was the bit about the hand movement at the transition from drive to recovery. They don't just stop and reverse direction. They make that little downward curl. It is hard to describe in a message. As far as the rest of it is concerned, I am not too happy with the position of her hands towards the end of the recovery. They drop way low and then rise to the catch. I am sure that she never got away with that in a boat. I can hear the coach's voice now, "You're skying your oars!" The strange thing is that I have seen this handle lowering in a couple of other training videos - one of the young woman in the C2 technique demo and one of Xeno Mueller, the Olympic single sculls gold medalist. I am sure that neither of them use this technique on the water. The rule there is that your hands stay on the table top. With a slightly lower plane for the recovery, of course. On the erg, I doubt that all this matters in the slightest. Compared to real rowing, erging is very forgiving in a lot of ways.

Re my sternum wires: They have been there well over 13 years now, so I am sure that the bone tissue has built up more than well enough since the surgery, but I never bothered to have the wires removed, so I can still feel them with my fingers under the skin covering the sternum. Not really an issue as long as I don't get bumped there hard enough for them to tear through the skin. The replaced valve is another matter. I was told that it would be good for 10-12 years, so it is well past its shelf date. I suppose that it could give out at any time.

Bob S.

User avatar
ergo sum
Paddler
Posts: 22
Joined: October 17th, 2015, 12:07 am
Location: Florida USA

Re: Basic training questions

Post by ergo sum » October 24th, 2015, 1:28 pm

Next days' improvement (Oct 23)
df=110 Unstrapped
min m W r W:r pace
24 5780 181 24 7.5 02:04.50
4 952 175 27 6.5 02:06.00
4 958 178 25 7.1 02:05.20
4 958 178 24 7.4 02:05.20
4 965 182 24 7.6 02:04.30
4 967 183 24 7.6 02:04.00
4 985 194 24 8.0 02:01.80

The last piece I felt my breathing for the first time again a little, instead of getting no breathing activity. I still sweat, but it is nothing near what it used to be, and when I step off the machine breathing resets to normal right away (Before it took perhaps 3 minutes to leave the deeply-winded state all the way to normal). I'm afraid to do 'free-form' with straps out of curiosity, until the awkward/discomforts with the newly correcting stroke are gone, since I don't want to risk injury. I'm just hoping this will work out and start to feel normal.

It looks like I'm learning better to row at lower ~24 rate @ df=110 :-), thanks to everyone's helping hands. This would have been impossible a week ago before I found the forum. I'm still worried about stress in the knees (something feels pulling at my knee) and lower back (slight non-localized soreness). Strangely, my poor form before @ df=191 caused no knee soreness nor lower back soreness and I didn't mention earlier, but the warm-up before always was just a few seconds of random stretching on the seat before I began in those previous rows for 5-6 months, daily. I am also concerned about not having enough natural butt/pelvic-padding (fat cushion or massive muscle due to my lean build) and what can be put on the seat shell to dampen the pressure in the perineal area? This occurs for me when transitioning from the rest to a forward catch, and again to the beginning of the drive ... at the time the body is angled toward the fan and engages it toward maximum force and begins to lean back, which is the greater concern.
----------------------------------------
Thanks Bob!
Yes all that motion in the videos with chains going up and down seem very awkward to me. There was a fellow who used the neighboring machine the other day with reasonable form but he wildly lifted, curled and and dropped the handle and it felt like I was scratching a blackboard to watch. I rowed with my eyes closed nearly the whole run with occasional peaks to the PM to stay on targets, so he didn't ruin my timing with the showy chain gymnastics. I think of myself as sawing a large tree with an old style two person saw, and I'm at one end and the other is the C2 and we just need to learn to work in concert. I can now appreciate Henry's advice I didn't understand before about the chain "catching" the fan - it makes sense now and is very important I see, and I'd love to see a video of the machine with the bare fan and chain assembly exposed to better understand what's happening when the gear meshes. Does it have a clutch :?:

About those W:r measures, I generally agree but think the devil is in the details. We are multiplying (W:r)*60 to get "Joules" of something theoretical invented for the PM4. But I'm taking it a step further in that I'd like to clarify for myself what goes into instantaneous Watts digital result displayed. It is refreshed after each stroke but is being affected by the effective stroke rate which it cannot know except by taking some sort of prior time into consideration. To be honest, I've lost some faith in the accuracy of the numbers the PM4 displays, and that is the reason I would like to see the accurate calculation for the work in Joules under each individual stroke curve. The monitor seems to make a lot of calculation assumptions for example when transitioning between pieces of a continuous run. I think the basic problem is the PM is measuring work done by the fan updating when the pull on the chain returns to zero which to me would be a design flaw. It should try to measure the energy input, not the energy dissipated. That may sound like a academic difference, but to me it is a major design hurdle with consequences for training. Although the customers for C2 may be varied and forum geeks may be a tiny fraction as you say, I can't accept that C2 got to where it is by not catering specifically to this subgroup of fanatics and that is the only reason they got to be in the position they are today. I don't mind the calories' assumption since they are intended to help with dieting. They are actually kcal anyway :D and attempting to fit body burn rates which is hokey to begin with (we have work input being converted to dissipation work now converted to body work performed) and easier to see how limited the numbers really can be than the Watts interpretations. I may be incorrect in my interpretation, and I know a lot of work went into getting a practical design for the PM, but the doubts are all valid and I might just call them to have TS explain their perspective.

5 W:r sounds decent enough to me. Ever since Henry explained me the pyramid with 5:36 on top and everyone else swimming somewhere under it, I've gotten a new attitude that I feel is much healthier. Just to be the best I can be. They'll always be someone ahead and someone behind. Sounds like you got the pig valve. Dad had the St. Jude's. It was mechanical and if I put my ear near his chest I could hear the valve clicking his pulse. Not to mention the rat-poison (blood thinner) which made life difficult that the pig valve would have eliminated the need. Dad could have had a pig valve, but his lifespan merited the mechanical one. But something else got Him and all the blood thinning and clicking was for nothing. The great thing was that He never let the valve affect his physical state and exercise vigorously and religiously which left Him in perfect health and a superb quality of life despite the issues with the valve. Wish He were here to row with me. He'd have really loved it, just like you B)
Image

Post Reply