Given that you can't do 5K @ 1:48 I think that's unlikely.ranger wrote:I suspect that if he did 5K at 1:35 OTErg
Ice and lemon?
Given that you can't do 5K @ 1:48 I think that's unlikely.ranger wrote:I suspect that if he did 5K at 1:35 OTErg
I think the 10 MPS business is indeed good to get your stroke flowing at higher ratings, etc.Rocket Roy wrote:You must be really good to do a FM at 1.48.
I just did only a 30 min piece at 1.52.2 average and...26 spm and it nearly killed me. OK it was strapless but even so.
Front crawl? Bit of a thrash but given your lack of co-ordination, on the money I would say.ranger wrote:When I get to the top of my ratings, will I be able to do 37 spm for 120 strokes?
Naw.Brunsle wrote:There have been countless things that were significant and that were done selflessly.
ranger wrote:A 6:16 2K OTErg is just a tick off the 30s lwt American record by this guy:
http://www.google.com/imgres?imgurl=htt ... DA&dur=932
And, give or take a bit, it is rowing just about as good as this 38-year-old Olympian, the best rower, both OTErg and OTW, of our time:
[img]http://img204.imageshack.us/img204/5751 ... bbesen.jpg[/img
ranger
We'll know my chances of pulling 6:16 for 2K long before I even start sharpening.bellboy wrote:You will never get anywhere near 6.16. We know it. You know it.The rabid raccoon in your garden knows it. My dog knows it.
This is exciting news. According to your table, we will see a 4:04 or faster elapsed time when you do 24 spm for your 1K trial tomorrow. That's awesome.Ranger wrote:August 18, 2011: Now that my speed coach is calibrated, I'll start some verification tomorrow with a couple of low rate 1K trials--22 spm and 24 spm.
ranger wrote:We'll know my chances of pulling 6:16 for 2K long before I even start sharpening.bellboy wrote:You will never get anywhere near 6.16. We know it. You know it.The rabid raccoon in your garden knows it. My dog knows it.
A FM @ 1:48 predicts a 6:16 2K.
A FM @ 1:46...
ranger
It is probably pretty obvious that I have become quite bitter towards you. I started following this mid December of last year and had high hope for what you are trying to accomplish. I intentionally altered how I learned to erg in hopes that your way was truly better and that I could just start that way. It turns out you have not lived up to one promise, while you explain your technique endlessly you have not provided a shred of evidence that it works, you expect me to just follow you on blind faith no matter how many times you fail to meet the expectations that you have set and so I am bitter toward you. If you ever deliver as promised I will be the first to apologize and congratulate you on your accomplishment, however I now believe it will never happen.ranger wrote:Naw.Brunsle wrote:There have been countless things that were significant and that were done selflessly.
Don't believe it for a minute.
Most significant accomplishment is just self-expression.
And what isn't self-expression is self-interested.
Given a Christian context, in the West, much of the apparently selfless behavior historically was done to save your soul.
That's the most selfish thing imaginable.
If you _lost_/_gave up_ your soul to save some else, now that would be something else entirely.
But no one did that.
Piety is just selfishness in rags.
ranger
If you want to work hard and achieve something significant then I don't think anyone would belittle you for saying it, especially if asked. If you constantly ran around spouting off about it over an over it would still come across as a bit arrogant and narcissistic but at least you would have "earned" the right to say it. Never have I suggested you should lie about your accomplishments.ranger wrote:If you work hard and do something significant, I don't think there is any reason at all not to say so.
Why not call a spade a spade?
Why lie?
Sorry.
But if I meet all of my distance targets and pull a lwt 6:16 2K at 60, in this sport, it will be a pretty significant affair.
It will absolutely (gobsmackingly) blow the hell out of all current standards in senior and veteran erging from 40-70 years old.
ranger