data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/25e03/25e03b2b634d40034aa2b33fa2c3e74fb0fcdf36" alt="Laughing :lol:"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1138d/1138dcf9a78666989a0df06047e3a93ca77d9a8b" alt="Rolling Eyes :roll:"
Yes, Roland we all get that you love dynamic ergs and hate static ones, in paticualr C2.
Message recieved and understood.
He is not the only one. I used a static erg for many years, even for a couple of years after I bought my slides. At the beginning of this season I finally forced myself to use the slides for several sessions until I got the hang of the timing needed. In January, I reluctantly went back to the static erg in order to get used to it again in preparation for the winter competition. After the ergatta, I went back to the slides and will stick with them from now on. Admittedly, I am not happy about the large area that the slides take up, but, one of these days, I may spring for the new Dynamic C2.rayg1 wrote:I don't think Rockin Roland could troll any harder even if he tried!
![]()
Yes, Roland we all get that you love dynamic ergs and hate static ones, in paticualr C2.
Message recieved and understood.
The proper internet term for this breed is not "troll" - it is a "shill".rayg1 wrote:I don't think Rockin Roland could troll any harder even if he tried!
![]()
Yes, Roland we all get that you love dynamic ergs and hate static ones, in paticualr C2.
Message recieved and understood.
Yes, on this forum I've been going on about the virtues of using a dynamic erg for years now. It's about time you blokes got the message!!!rayg1 wrote:I don't think Rockin Roland could troll any harder even if he tried!
![]()
Yes, Roland we all get that you love dynamic ergs and hate static ones, in paticualr C2.
Message recieved and understood.
I'm expecting to see him over in the Women's Forum plugging away...." I used to row times like a 12 year old sheila ... then I got a RowPerfect "rayg1 wrote: I don't think Rockin Roland could troll any harder even if he tried!
![]()
Yes, Roland we all get that you love dynamic ergs and hate static ones, in paticualr C2.
That's the sad, sad thing about static erg chain jerkers. No wonder you get bored on those things. The only thing that you can do is chase numbers. You have no concept of anything else associated with erging. Just chasing numbers.carlb wrote:I'm expecting to see him over in the Women's Forum plugging away...." I used to row times like a 12 year old sheila ... then I got a RowPerfect "rayg1 wrote: I don't think Rockin Roland could troll any harder even if he tried!
![]()
Yes, Roland we all get that you love dynamic ergs and hate static ones, in paticualr C2.![]()
Only if the brain in question is quite small.Rockin Roland wrote: The problem with static ergs is that your head oscillates almost 2 metres with every stroke. The brain is repeatedly shaken which becomes incredibly fatiguing.
aharmer,aharmer wrote:I've expressed my disagreement with Roland's C2 bashing on the C2 site in the past, and still feel the same way, but he has a right to his opinion. My question today however, is how much brain power do you need to erg????? Your brain gets fatigued because you're sliding back and forth a further distance? I probably use about 1/2 of 1% of my brain's capacity while erging so a little fatigue isn't going to kill me even if that is true. The other thing to remember is that not everybody is erging to keep themselves in shape for OTW rowing. I use the erg as one of many fitness tools, nothing more. I'd guess a majority of people that look at this forum DO NOT row OTW. For many people it's nothing more than a machine that kicks your ass and wears you out.
Roland, do you have any documents on the forces on your brain while rowing, or any scientific/research evidence that your brain is subjected to forces large enough to cause fatique? Your body is moving relatively slowly, and has very 'soft' stops, when compared with other activities like running (and particularly when compared with sports like basketball) ... I've never heard of any non-contact sports causing brain fatigue due to "smashing".Rockin Roland wrote: The problem with static ergs is that your head oscillates almost 2 metres with every stroke. The brain is repeatedly shaken which becomes incredibly fatiguing.
My 1000m and 2000m times on a C2 model D and the same erg on slides are identical. The only difference is that I have to rate about 4 or 5 spm higher on slides (both ergs at 130 drag) to achieve the same results. I have done many time trials over the last 12 months and no matter how hard I try, there is consistantly less than 1 second difference between the two for me.aharmer wrote: Do your interval workouts on a Model D or E mimic the watts you produce on the new erg? Not that it really matters, just wondering if those thing stay the same when you change to the new style.
This was brought to my attention about 5 months ago after reading a document on this topic here in Oz. I'm trying to locate it for you. The document pointed out situations that we are totally oblivious to when training yet they adversely affect our performance. We are not talking about brain damage here but rather a mental state caused by the movement on a static erg. You don'thave to travel at break neck speed to reach this state. For example, while reading this post rock your head from side to side. What do you feel? It's uncomfortable isn't it. Imagine doing it 1600 times. Don't you think that would case mental fatigue? The problem is that on a static erg so many other things are going on with your body that you don't even realise this mental state. Or if you do you attribute the cause to something else like oxygen debt.luckylindy wrote:Roland, do you have any documents on the forces on your brain while rowing, or any scientific/research evidence that your brain is subjected to forces large enough to cause fatique? Your body is moving relatively slowly, and has very 'soft' stops, when compared with other activities like running (and particularly when compared with sports like basketball) ... IRockin Roland wrote: The problem with static ergs is that your head oscillates almost 2 metres with every stroke. The brain is repeatedly shaken which becomes incredibly fatiguing.
Rockin Roland wrote:This was brought to my attention about 5 months ago after reading a document on this topic here in Oz. I'm trying to locate it for you. The document pointed out situations that we are totally oblivious to when training yet they adversely affect our performance. We are not talking about brain damage here but rather a mental state caused by the movement on a static erg. You don'thave to travel at break neck speed to reach this state. For example, while reading this post rock your head from side to side. What do you feel? It's uncomfortable isn't it. Imagine doing it 1600 times. Don't you think that would case mental fatigue? The problem is that on a static erg so many other things are going on with your body that you don't even realise this mental state. Or if you do you attribute the cause to something else like oxygen debt.luckylindy wrote:Roland, do you have any documents on the forces on your brain while rowing, or any scientific/research evidence that your brain is subjected to forces large enough to cause fatique? Your body is moving relatively slowly, and has very 'soft' stops, when compared with other activities like running (and particularly when compared with sports like basketball) ... IRockin Roland wrote: The problem with static ergs is that your head oscillates almost 2 metres with every stroke. The brain is repeatedly shaken which becomes incredibly fatiguing.
Perhaps this will give you something to think about next time you reach the point of boredom during a workout on a static erg.