ranger wrote:If I just stroke steadily
ranger

ranger wrote:If I just stroke steadily
ranger
of course he has. he just can't do it at AT yet!BrianStaff wrote:So, you have not yet pulled a 2K at 32spm?ranger wrote:When I get a solid AT 2K at 32 spm.Brian Staff wrote:When does sharpening start?
You mean like Mike VB, who missed his target by 12 seconds at WIRC 2010?TomR wrote:Tomorrow he won't come anywhere near 6.30 for 2k
You mean like your last week's prediction of 6:28 against 6:50 and change? Only > 22 seconds out, not bad. But that's rangermath for youranger wrote:You mean like Mike VB, who missed his target by 12 seconds at WIRC 2010?TomR wrote:Tomorrow he won't come anywhere near 6.30 for 2k
No, I think I'll do quite a bit better than that in estimating my abilities, and unlike Mike's wild misjudgment, without any predictive sharpening workouts for guidance.
ranger
At least he has a history, you history in the 55/60 bracket is almost empty, you have a few 6.40/50 , lots of 7 plus races and even more DNS.ranger wrote:No, your list is history.mikvan52 wrote:mike's list
ranger
You, on the other hand are only just 26 seconds away from your target,ranger wrote:You mean like Mike VB, who missed his target by 12 seconds at WIRC 2010?TomR wrote:Tomorrow he won't come anywhere near 6.30 for 2k
No, I think I'll do quite a bit better than that in estimating my abilities, and unlike Mike's wild misjudgment, without any predictive sharpening workouts for guidance.
ranger
The doubt quickly vanishes from his mind, replaced withI think I am a little late with my training still. I suspect that I will reach a peak next year, not this year.
" andI don't need any help with erging (my stroke is perfect)
No wait.I'll get a sub-6:30 2K.
I assume this is the event:"I now row like Eskild. In fact, I might be faster. I might row under 6:00 for 2K.
Excellent post.jliddil wrote:ranger wrote:If I just stroke steadily
ranger
If I had 2 bits for every time Ranger used a phase like this...........ranger wrote:Over the next six weeks, the workouts that will be crucial for me, I think, are repeat 2Ks, of whatever number, perhaps up to 10 (a Zatopek 2K workout).
Wow! what a loser!lintonwilson wrote:ranger....DNF
DNF is not news. It's called a consequence. Start stupid. End foolish.TomR wrote:ranger wrote: . . . I think I will pull a 2K, 1:37 @ 32 spm, the day after tomorrow, Saturday morning, in Detroit.
Please do set off at a 1.37 pace. Any rate.
That is a guarantee of failure. You'll be lucking to be pulling 1.45s when you hit 750 to go.