Hmm...after putting in 46k yesterday I found myself thinking about all of the same things that Bob brought up. To be honest, that row was probably a bit too far and my body is saying "hello brain??? time to back off!" Everything's fine, but it was clear that I was getting close to the point of hurting something (strangely enough it's one knee, on the back side).
That got me to thinking "well why the heck am I doing this?", and the answer of course was that there's this drive to put in the maximum number of meters possible. Once this month is over I am sure I'm going to
considerably change my workouts since I don't feel like these LSDs are actually accomplishing my overall goals.
My overall goal is not measured in meters, but in weight stability, aerobic capability, and the ability to ski the West Face of KT22 with a pack on my back without stopping. The weight thing is relatively minor, just didn't like the fact that I was starting to gain weight for no reason and decided to put an end to it. So next month I'll be doing shorter, but much more intense workouts and trying to ignore any measurements of total meters.
As to a better way to do a contest...it's tough. I was trying to think of something that would reward individual improvement. Some combination of total meters (to reward dedication and consistency) as well as a bonus that rewarded percent improvement in personal bests for specific distances. It would be tough to avoid sandbagging though (the PB thing would require ranked workouts prior to the beginning of the challenge, pretty easy to just post a slow row prior to the challenge then "improve" dramatically). Also lots of people probably don't rank their rows to start with, so at the end of the day I really can't come up with anything better than just measuring total meters per member.
And just to launch into geek-ville, I imported this morning's data into a database and did some fooling around. Looking at meters/member:
- We are in 52nd place out of 330 teams.
- Many of the top "teams" have less than 5 members (Imagine what would happen if David and Heather formed their own team)
- If you consider only teams having 20 members or more, we are 11th out of 58
- If you consider only teams having 50 members or more, we are 5th out of 20
All in all I think that's actually a pretty darned impressive team showing!