Byron, it is you that is giving me the motivation to try out the single. I know that you started at a mature age, so it encourages me that I might be able to do the same.Byron Drachman wrote:I know the feeling.
Cheers,
Dave.
Byron, it is you that is giving me the motivation to try out the single. I know that you started at a mature age, so it encourages me that I might be able to do the same.Byron Drachman wrote:I know the feeling.
Hi Dave,Snail Space wrote:that with age his balance was shot to pieces
Are you familiar with one-oared sculling? It works very well used at the stern of a long, skinny boat and is great for use in narrow channels where there is not room for oars to the sides. Although it is extremely awkward to use it to go sideways, it is possible if you just use care and patience. There are two methods, blades vertical and blades horizontal. With Macon blades the horizontal is the easiest for me. With hatchets, it is probably necessary to stick with horizontal. If you are familiar with finning when you are swimming, it is the same principle. The blade (or hand) goes back and forth using the proper tilt for each direction.Snail Space wrote: I'll have to ask some of the old hands for some tips.
I flipped a wide training boat when I was doing the learn-to-row course. How embarrassing! I had been dreading a dunking, and so I had studied several youtube videos about how to re-enter the boat. When the momentous event happened I was surprised to find that the water was only knee-high, and I could simply step back into the boat. No hassle.gregsmith01748 wrote:... the end of the season, but on Halloween, with an air temp of 0C, I managed to flip the damn thing.
Not on Lake Sabrina. It is never really warm - too deep and too high an altitude.Byron Drachman wrote: Hi Bob,
Maybe when the water is warmer you can get out.
One of the founders of our rowing club has a sandolo that he made. He makes the boat go fairly fast just using one oar.Bob S. wrote:Re one-oar sculling: Here's another website that has several videos of sculling being done:
http://www.duckworksbbs.com/gear/scullmatix/index.htm
I don't know why they made such a big deal over the device the guy invented. I have never felt the need for it. All it takes is a simple twist of the oar at each change of direction - not all that different from feathering
The boat shown in the videos is not ideal for one-oared sculling. A well designed boat would be much faster than that. It needs to be long and slender, but stable enough for the sculler to stand up. I used to use that on my 26' trimaran when there was no wind and my outboard was giving problems. It displaced about 2 tons, but I could move it at about 1.5 knots. A boat used for that has to track well - it shouldn't have much wiggle as the oar goes from side to side. A typical dinghy is too squirrelly to propel with that method.
Obviously you don't want to stand up when you use the technique to move a lightweight rowing shell to the side, so you can't put the power in it that you would for normal one-oar propulsion, but you are not going all that far - just a couple of feet or so.
I have heard that one-oared sculling is done a lot in the Danube delta by the cormorant fishermen. A lot of the channels are too narrow for two-oared rowing and the single oar sculling is very quiet as well.
Bob S.
Hey, Mike. That was just a side issue that I tossed in for fun. Your response ignored the main point of my post and that was that it is not all lakes and rivers. There are a lot of rowing venues on protected salt water inlets. Aren't you involved with Annapolis and isn't that on the Chesapeake? My old haunts were all salt water bays or arms of them, the Alameda estuary behind Alameda Island in San Francisco Bay. Newport Bay in Orange County, Ca., Los Alamitos Bay in Long Beach, and Mission Bay in San Diego. I am not familiar enough with Seattle to know which rowing venues there are fresh water lakes and which are inlets off of Puget Sound, but I have no doubt by there are protected venues there that are neither lakes nor rivers.mikvan52 wrote:open water ocean rowing `A brutish endeavour... I don't know why that would bb classified as OTW training
"Survival of the fittest" is more like it... a "step beyond"... your training is done when you embark on a venture like that...
I hope someone chimes in who's done one of these feats.... Truly admirable and remarkable but is it training?
I'm just being light hearted too.Bob S. wrote:Hey, Mike. That was just a side issue that I tossed in for fun. Your response ignored the main point of my post and that was that it is not all lakes and rivers. There are a lot of rowing venues on protected salt water inlets. Aren't you involved with Annapolis and isn't that on the Chesapeake? My old haunts were all salt water bays or arms of them, the Alameda estuary behind Alameda Island in San Francisco Bay. Newport Bay in Orange County, Ca., Los Alamitos Bay in Long Beach, and Mission Bay in San Diego. I am not familiar enough with Seattle to know which rowing venues there are fresh water lakes and which are inlets off of Puget Sound, but I have no doubt by there are protected venues there that are neither lakes nor rivers.mikvan52 wrote:open water ocean rowing `A brutish endeavour... I don't know why that would bb classified as OTW training
"Survival of the fittest" is more like it... a "step beyond"... your training is done when you embark on a venture like that...
I hope someone chimes in who's done one of these feats.... Truly admirable and remarkable but is it training?