I see a lot of rowers here have their "low pull" identified in the signature line.
Where do people get that value from?
Is it recorded on the logcard? Is it from just doing one pull? or do they just remember it as it flashes by on the PM screen?
Just curious - Brian
Low Pull
- BrianStaff
- 2k Poster
- Posts: 220
- Joined: February 14th, 2008, 2:20 pm
- Location: Scottsdale, Arizona
Low Pull
M 65 / 6'3" / 234lbs as of Feb 14, 2008...now 212
Started Rowing: 2/22/2008
Vancouver Rowing Club - Life Member(Rugby Section)
PB: 500m 1:44.0 2K 7:57.1 5K 20:58.7 30' 6866m
Started Rowing: 2/22/2008
Vancouver Rowing Club - Life Member(Rugby Section)
PB: 500m 1:44.0 2K 7:57.1 5K 20:58.7 30' 6866m
- Citroen
- SpamTeam
- Posts: 8023
- Joined: March 16th, 2006, 3:28 pm
- Location: A small cave in deepest darkest Basingstoke, UK
Re: Low Pull
Damper lever at (or near max).BrianStaff wrote:Just curious - Brian
Row six to ten big strokes.
Remember the lowest split you see on the monitor.
It's a) totally pointless b) puts your lower back at risk and c) doesn't give you anything other than a useless number to brag about.
If you want some science to record low pull dowload PMI from http://www.concept2.co.uk/software/pmi.php as the sample spreadsheet included with that excellent software package includes a LOW PULL log.
I agree that it is largely useless. But I do find it a bit fun.
2whlrcr, it sounds like you were not warm and pulled to hard in the beginning? There is another test called "first pull" which I consider more dangerous; ie. how low can you get your first pull from standstill. Is that what you did?
I have got my low pull readings pretty far into sessions. Just sped upp to see how low I could get the splits. I see no major risks with that approach.
2whlrcr, it sounds like you were not warm and pulled to hard in the beginning? There is another test called "first pull" which I consider more dangerous; ie. how low can you get your first pull from standstill. Is that what you did?
I have got my low pull readings pretty far into sessions. Just sped upp to see how low I could get the splits. I see no major risks with that approach.
47 years, 186/85
[img]http://www.c2ctc.com/sigs/img1195449471.png[/img]
[img]http://www.c2ctc.com/sigs/img1195449471.png[/img]
- johnlvs2run
- Half Marathon Poster
- Posts: 4012
- Joined: March 16th, 2006, 1:13 pm
- Location: California Central Coast
- Contact:
Re: Low Pull
http://www.concept2.co.uk/forum/viewtop ... f=4&t=3113BrianStaff wrote:I see a lot of rowers here have their "low pull" identified in the signature line.
Where do people get that value from?
bikeerg 75 5'8" 155# - 18.5 - 51.9 - 568 - 1:52.7 - 8:03.8 - 20:13.1 - 14620 - 40:58.7 - 28855 - 1:23:48.0
rowerg 56-58 5'8.5" 143# - 1:39.6 - 3:35.6 - 7:24.0 - 18:57.4 - 22:49.9 - 7793 - 38:44.7 - 1:22:48.9 - 2:58:46.2
rowerg 56-58 5'8.5" 143# - 1:39.6 - 3:35.6 - 7:24.0 - 18:57.4 - 22:49.9 - 7793 - 38:44.7 - 1:22:48.9 - 2:58:46.2
I was warmed up adequately. But I pulled to hard on my first pull.Stefan wrote:I agree that it is largely useless. But I do find it a bit fun.
2whlrcr, it sounds like you were not warm and pulled to hard in the beginning? There is another test called "first pull" which I consider more dangerous; ie. how low can you get your first pull from standstill. Is that what you did?
51, 5'11", 183lbs and going down slowly