Thank You C2

read only section for reference and search purposes.
[old] Anony Mous
Posts: 0
Joined: March 18th, 2006, 10:32 pm

General

Post by [old] Anony Mous » January 24th, 2006, 2:10 am

<!--QuoteBegin-PaulS+Jan 23 2006, 04:45 PM--><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td><div class='genmed'><b>QUOTE(PaulS @ Jan 23 2006, 04:45 PM)</b></div></td></tr><tr><td class='quote'><!--QuoteEBegin-->Seriously, measuring success by targeting yourself against an unknown individual is really kind of crazy... <br /> <br /> </td></tr></table><br /><br />I don't measure my success on the performance of others. It's the journey, not the result that is important. It doesn't really matter if the race is for the world championship or to just get a faster time than the person ahead of you in the ranking. I am amazed at those people who strive for excellence, even if it's only to move up in the rankings.<br /><br />Recent posts have targeted the flaws in the ranking system. There have been quite a few posts that have said that only race pieces should be include in the 2K ranking. I like the ranking system as it is. I like to look through the profiles and see all the different types of athletes out there. This year I had to get a code to rank my pieces and use verification codes to justify my times. I wonder how many people just didn't bother.

Locked