<br /> </td></tr></table><br /><br />nice row, your impoving quickly!<br />500m Training
-
[old] Ben Rea
- Posts: 0
- Joined: March 18th, 2006, 10:32 pm
Training
<!--quoteo(post=59129:date=Mar 12 2006, 03:02 PM:name=braveheart007)--><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td><div class='genmed'><b>QUOTE(braveheart007 @ Mar 12 2006, 03:02 PM) </b></div></td></tr><tr><td class='quote'>Put your advice into practice, and well I must say working a treat.<br /><br />He started with 1.28.32 and saying he can do 1.18???<br />I then did 1.28.0<br />He then did 1.27.0 admittedly he looked comfortable and saying he will beat whatever I put up.<br /><br />Today I did 1.25.0 - lets see where he goes with that!<br /><br />Thanks again. <br /> </td></tr></table><br /><br />nice row, your impoving quickly!<br />
<br /> </td></tr></table><br /><br />nice row, your impoving quickly!<br />-
[old] michaelb
- Posts: 0
- Joined: March 18th, 2006, 10:32 pm
Training
1:25 is a great row for a 500m, good job. If I am doing the math correctly, a 1:18 requires 738 watts, so 168 more watts than your 1:25 (570 watts), or 29% more power. So a 1:18 is a very long way off still. To put this in further perspective for me, doing a 1:15 requires twice the power that I am capable of producing (816 watts vs 408 watts).