"not Eligible For Ranking"?

[[old] highkneeler]

Can someone provide a clarification to satisfy my curiosity? Today I noticed in my 2005 log that a 100m entry is notated as not eligible for ranking (in the little block that says rank when it's a ranking-eligible piece). I already knew this wasn't an official ranking distance, nor were my 12k and 14k pieces, but they didn't merit this comment. So, why does 100m get a notice while other distances are left blank?<br /><br />Again, just curious.<br /><br />Thanks,<br />Will Rhodes

[[old] ancho]

Check if you logged the distance as Stnadard, water or slides. From my experience, water-distance appear as "non-elegible for ranking".<br /><br />www.ceu-rem-com

[[old] highkneeler]

<!--QuoteBegin-ancho+May 9 2005, 06:56 AM--><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td><div class='genmed'><b>QUOTE(ancho @ May 9 2005, 06:56 AM)</b></div></td></tr><tr><td class='quote'><!--QuoteEBegin-->Check if you logged the distance as Stnadard, water or slides. From my experience, water-distance appear as "non-elegible for ranking".<br /><br />www.ceu-rem-com <br /> </td></tr></table><br /><br />Ancho,<br /><br />Thanks for the suggestion - I just re-checked to make sure because sometimes things do change on me (like the club affiliation did this weekend), but no, all my entries are standard. I'm just going to guess that 100m just sounds like an official distance, and C2 wants to be clear that it isn't!<br /><br />Will