New Bantor Session

read only section for reference and search purposes.
[old] dadams
Posts: 0
Joined: March 18th, 2006, 10:32 pm

General

Post by [old] dadams » October 28th, 2004, 3:30 pm

Some good ones Niall.<br><br>Maybe I should stop picking on the English as a whole, and start picking on their rowers/ergers. Maybe in particular MAD Team rowers/ergers.<br><br>Anyone care to play??<br><br>Dwayne

[old] Niall
Posts: 0
Joined: March 18th, 2006, 10:32 pm

General

Post by [old] Niall » October 28th, 2004, 3:39 pm

M.A.D. = Meatheads And Divas<br>

[old] andyArvid
Posts: 0
Joined: March 18th, 2006, 10:32 pm

General

Post by [old] andyArvid » October 28th, 2004, 3:40 pm

<!--QuoteBegin-Sir Pirate+Oct 28 2004, 09:12 AM--></div><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td class='genmed'><span class='genmed'><b>QUOTE</b></span> (Sir Pirate @ Oct 28 2004, 09:12 AM)</td></tr><tr><td class='quote'><!--QuoteEBegin--> <br>Alexander Graham Bell was born in 1847 in Edinburgh, Scotland, ENGLAND. He moved to Canada when he was 23 and only then migrated to the USA. He was British so Brits can rightly claim the telephone is a British invention. <br> <!--QuoteEnd--> </td></tr></table><br> 1. Last I heard Scotland and England are separate "home" nations.<br><br>2. <a href='http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/sci/tech/3253174.stm' target='_blank'>Bell did not invent the telephone</a> also <a href='http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Elisha_Gray' target='_blank'>Elisha Gray</a> had a similar patent but applied coincidently 2 hours after Bell on the same day. Elisha Gray is American.<br>

[old] Vapor Trails
Posts: 0
Joined: March 18th, 2006, 10:32 pm

General

Post by [old] Vapor Trails » October 28th, 2004, 6:15 pm

<!--QuoteBegin-dadams+Oct 28 2004, 02:30 PM--></div><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td class='genmed'><span class='genmed'><b>QUOTE</b></span> (dadams @ Oct 28 2004, 02:30 PM)</td></tr><tr><td class='quote'><!--QuoteEBegin-->Some good ones Niall.<br><br>Maybe I should stop picking on the English as a whole, and start picking on their rowers/ergers. Maybe in particular MAD Team rowers/ergers.<br><br>Anyone care to play??<br><br>Dwayne<!--QuoteEnd--> </td></tr></table><br>Dwyane could stop being a poof and actually do a race <br><br>

[old] KMurphy
Posts: 0
Joined: March 18th, 2006, 10:32 pm

General

Post by [old] KMurphy » October 28th, 2004, 7:32 pm

All I know is if I take TAFF + MAD and read it backwards I get ...<br><br>DAM FFAT ?? <br><br>Not saying that means anything though .....<br><br>Not saying it's the subliminal message you use to motivate yourselves to those great times ...<br><br>KMurphy

[old] Niall
Posts: 0
Joined: March 18th, 2006, 10:32 pm

General

Post by [old] Niall » October 29th, 2004, 12:37 am

<table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td class='genmed'><span class='genmed'><b>QUOTE</b></span> </td></tr><tr><td class='quote'><!--QuoteEBegin--> All I know is if I take TAFF + MAD and read it backwards I get ...<br><br>DAM FFAT ??<!--QuoteEnd--> </td></tr></table><br><br>Nice one KMurphy, I like it!!

[old] Canoeist
Posts: 0
Joined: March 18th, 2006, 10:32 pm

General

Post by [old] Canoeist » October 29th, 2004, 8:19 am

<!--QuoteBegin-dadams+Oct 28 2004, 02:53 PM--></div><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td class='genmed'><span class='genmed'><b>QUOTE</b></span> (dadams @ Oct 28 2004, 02:53 PM)</td></tr><tr><td class='quote'><!--QuoteEBegin--> [QUOTE=Niall,Oct 28 2004, 09:46 AM] How many times in the history of Briton has a Royal been assassinated? And I'm not talking by a member of the court looking to get the Throne. None that I'm aware of. Why? Because there is respect. <!--QuoteEnd--> </td></tr></table><br> Whoa there! You must be reading a different history book than the one I read in primary school. Killing royals in days of yore seemed to be a jolly good blood sport similar to having a fox hunt. Wasn't it good ol' King Henry who lopped off the head of his wife every time that he wanted to have a romp with another lady? I lost count, but didn't he change wives more often than he changed his underwear? I admire his logic though - the church elders condemned those who divorce, so he merely exploited a technicality in their law. Speakig of Henry VIII, wasn't he the guy who knew that he couldn't get to Heaven if he stayed with the Catholic church? The clever dude started a new religion that worked better for him and then demand that all subjects either join him or lose their heads. Good man, that Henry! I think that he would have made a great lawyer! (Solicitor or Barrister) <br><br>Cheers,<br><br>Paul Flack

[old] Sir Pirate
Posts: 0
Joined: March 18th, 2006, 10:32 pm

General

Post by [old] Sir Pirate » October 29th, 2004, 10:13 am

The Dukes gone a bit quite. <br><br>Have you had enoguh?...............or do you want some more? <br><br>Sir Pirate

[old] Paul S
Posts: 0
Joined: March 18th, 2006, 10:32 pm

General

Post by [old] Paul S » October 29th, 2004, 10:17 am

Now that was banteringly good fun. <br><br>The other Paul S (The one with the space)

[old] dadams
Posts: 0
Joined: March 18th, 2006, 10:32 pm

General

Post by [old] dadams » October 29th, 2004, 3:37 pm

<!--QuoteBegin-Sir Pirate+Oct 29 2004, 09:13 AM--></div><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td class='genmed'><span class='genmed'><b>QUOTE</b></span> (Sir Pirate @ Oct 29 2004, 09:13 AM)</td></tr><tr><td class='quote'><!--QuoteEBegin--> The Dukes gone a bit quite. <br><br>Have you had enoguh?...............or do you want some more? <br><br>Sir Pirate <!--QuoteEnd--> </td></tr></table><br> I've had enough of the way the English spell enoguh! <br><br>Please....I have yet begun to bantor.<br><br>Any Brit, over the age of 40, gone sub 5:50 this year?? Yeah...didn't think so!!<br><br>Your serve.<br><br>Speedy

[old] Sir Pirate
Posts: 0
Joined: March 18th, 2006, 10:32 pm

General

Post by [old] Sir Pirate » October 29th, 2004, 3:49 pm

<u><b>Results from the British Indoor Rowing Championships 2002-</b></u><br><br>99 7:24.1 Andrew Wilson 38 Oarsport<br><b>100 7:24.9 Dwayne Adams 37</b><br>101 7:25.5 David Mitchinson 38 Royce's Gym<br><b>102 7:32.3 Phil Morris 35 </b><br><br>You Serve <br><br>Sir Pirate

[old] dadams
Posts: 0
Joined: March 18th, 2006, 10:32 pm

General

Post by [old] dadams » October 29th, 2004, 3:52 pm

<!--QuoteBegin-Sir Pirate+Oct 29 2004, 02:49 PM--></div><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td class='genmed'><span class='genmed'><b>QUOTE</b></span> (Sir Pirate @ Oct 29 2004, 02:49 PM)</td></tr><tr><td class='quote'><!--QuoteEBegin--> <u><b>Results from the British Indoor Rowing Championships 2002-</b></u><br><br>99 7:24.1 Andrew Wilson 38 Oarsport<br><b>100 7:24.9 Dwayne Adams 37</b><br>101 7:25.5 David Mitchinson 38 Royce's Gym<br><b>102 7:32.3 Phil Morris 35 </b><br><br>You Serve <br><br>Sir Pirate <!--QuoteEnd--> </td></tr></table><br> I finished with a 7:24.9 with a bad back my man. The back went at around the 500m mark.<br><br>Not only did I finish (in a heap I may add), but I was still faster than you!!<br><br>Dwayne returns Philip's volley with a smash!!

[old] Sir Pirate
Posts: 0
Joined: March 18th, 2006, 10:32 pm

General

Post by [old] Sir Pirate » October 29th, 2004, 4:06 pm

That was the 2nd time ever I had sat on a rower in my life, yet I got within 7 seconds of you, a sub 5:50 2K rower. I also had a really bad back on that day, but choose to row through the pain, cos that’s the kind of guy I am <br><br>Dwayne’s attempted smash easily picked of by Phil and returned with menacing power.<br><br>Sir Pirate

[old] Niall
Posts: 0
Joined: March 18th, 2006, 10:32 pm

General

Post by [old] Niall » October 29th, 2004, 4:08 pm

<table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td class='genmed'><span class='genmed'><b>QUOTE</b></span> </td></tr><tr><td class='quote'><!--QuoteEBegin-->100 7:24.9 Dwayne Adams 37<!--QuoteEnd--> </td></tr></table><br><br>Well that's reassuring. I'm 37 and my season's best for 2K is 7:25. Looks like I can look forward to a sub 5:50 2K in a couple of years time! (Do I really have to put in all those metres that you do though Speedy?? )<br><br>(Sorry this post is off topic )

[old] Godfried
Posts: 0
Joined: March 18th, 2006, 10:32 pm

General

Post by [old] Godfried » October 29th, 2004, 4:16 pm

<!--QuoteBegin-dadams+Oct 29 2004, 09:37 PM--></div><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td class='genmed'><span class='genmed'><b>QUOTE</b></span> (dadams @ Oct 29 2004, 09:37 PM)</td></tr><tr><td class='quote'><!--QuoteEBegin-->Any Brit, over the age of 40, gone sub 5:50 this year??<!--QuoteEnd--> </td></tr></table><br>Too low ?<br><br>Any non_Brit , over the age of 40, gone sub 5:50 at an official event this year ??

Locked