PM5 data v ‘other’ data
Posted: December 18th, 2020, 9:11 am
Why is there a difference between what is shown on the PM5 and (for me) ErgData, and then the downloads from ErgData?
Specifically a WP L4 60’ piece. I set the PM for 10’ intervals with zero rest so I can see how many strokes I take for each 10’ sequence. On the ErgData display I hit the exact number of strokes for 5 of the 10’ sequences and went over by 1 on the the other one.
Target strokes was 1032 (I thought I’d done 1033 with the extra on each I counted) and the ErgData summary showed 1030. The 2 ‘rogue’ strokes were +1 and -3 on two pieces that I counted, and ‘live’ ErgData showed as on target.
The metres are even more confusing.
PM5 and ErgData summary shows 14,679m. Total of each piece equals 14,684 - I assume the 5 is down to rounding. My sequences were: +3, -6, +2, -4, -2,+1,-6 for an overall 6m under target - pretty good I thought. But then the biggest difference/ confusion is the .csv download from my C2 log that shows I was: -2.7,-17.8,-3.6,-20,-8.3,-16.2 for a total of 68.6m under target, that seems a big difference from what the PM5 shows.
Can anyone explain why the .csv file is overall different from what the PM5 shows?
Specifically a WP L4 60’ piece. I set the PM for 10’ intervals with zero rest so I can see how many strokes I take for each 10’ sequence. On the ErgData display I hit the exact number of strokes for 5 of the 10’ sequences and went over by 1 on the the other one.
Target strokes was 1032 (I thought I’d done 1033 with the extra on each I counted) and the ErgData summary showed 1030. The 2 ‘rogue’ strokes were +1 and -3 on two pieces that I counted, and ‘live’ ErgData showed as on target.
The metres are even more confusing.
PM5 and ErgData summary shows 14,679m. Total of each piece equals 14,684 - I assume the 5 is down to rounding. My sequences were: +3, -6, +2, -4, -2,+1,-6 for an overall 6m under target - pretty good I thought. But then the biggest difference/ confusion is the .csv download from my C2 log that shows I was: -2.7,-17.8,-3.6,-20,-8.3,-16.2 for a total of 68.6m under target, that seems a big difference from what the PM5 shows.
Can anyone explain why the .csv file is overall different from what the PM5 shows?