Are the Old Model B's Faster for Strong Rowers?
Are the Old Model B's Faster for Strong Rowers?
I recall using the old model B's in the early/mid 1990's (1993/94). I've never been able to generate the same splits for short pieces (< 1k) on any model C or D since. Perhaps the open cage created drag factors that are simply not achievable in a Model C/D/E?
Re: Are the Old Model B's Faster for Strong Rowers?
I have a model B and C. I put a piece of masonite on the side of the B fan to reduce the drag factor. I don't notice any significant difference in my splits between the two now. Without that drag reducer, the B felt really heavy - if you like high drag factors for short sprints, the B is the machine.
Mark Underwood. Rower first, cyclist too.
- johnlvs2run
- Half Marathon Poster
- Posts: 4012
- Joined: March 16th, 2006, 1:13 pm
- Location: California Central Coast
- Contact:
Re: Are the Old Model B's Faster for Strong Rowers?
I had model B, C and D's, and didn't notice any difference between them including max low pulls and sprints. I covered the side of the B fan cage with roofing paper, most of the perimeter, and changed the sprockets to the same # of teeth as the later models, which brought the drag factor into a more normal range. There's probably a photo of it somewhere on here. The best thing about the B was the pm2+ monitor. If you like high drag, you can make the C, D and E drag factors as high as you want them to be.
bikeerg 75 5'8" 155# - 18.5 - 51.9 - 568 - 1:52.7 - 8:03.8 - 20:13.1 - 14620 - 40:58.7 - 28855 - 1:23:48.0
rowerg 56-58 5'8.5" 143# - 1:39.6 - 3:35.6 - 7:24.0 - 18:57.4 - 22:49.9 - 7793 - 38:44.7 - 1:22:48.9 - 2:58:46.2
rowerg 56-58 5'8.5" 143# - 1:39.6 - 3:35.6 - 7:24.0 - 18:57.4 - 22:49.9 - 7793 - 38:44.7 - 1:22:48.9 - 2:58:46.2