Resistance on new black model D

Maintenance, accessories, operation. Anything to do with making your erg work.
cwest87
Paddler
Posts: 1
Joined: January 27th, 2013, 7:36 pm

Resistance on new black model D

Post by cwest87 » January 27th, 2013, 7:41 pm

I've noticed a serious increase in resistance on the new black model D. Even at the same frag factor there is definitely more resistance than on the blue model D. I experienced this at an indoor regatta, and my team mate who owns a black model D agrees with me. Is there an explanation as to why this is? Has anyone experienced something similar?

User avatar
Citroen
SpamTeam
Posts: 8049
Joined: March 16th, 2006, 3:28 pm
Location: A small cave in deepest darkest Basingstoke, UK

Re: Resistance on new black model D

Post by Citroen » January 28th, 2013, 5:07 am

Clean the dust and crud out of the older machine. The air flow through that older machine is probably badly blocked.

Drag factor is a measurement made by the monitor it's not directly related to damper lever position.

Bob S.
Marathon Poster
Posts: 5142
Joined: March 16th, 2006, 12:00 pm

Re: Resistance on new black model D

Post by Bob S. » January 28th, 2013, 10:49 am

Citroen wrote:Clean the dust and crud out of the older machine. The air flow through that older machine is probably badly blocked.

Drag factor is a measurement made by the monitor it's not directly related to damper lever position.
But Dougie, he specifically said that it was at the same drag factor - not the same damper lever position.

Bob S.

User avatar
Citroen
SpamTeam
Posts: 8049
Joined: March 16th, 2006, 3:28 pm
Location: A small cave in deepest darkest Basingstoke, UK

Re: Resistance on new black model D

Post by Citroen » January 28th, 2013, 1:02 pm

Bob S. wrote:
Citroen wrote:Clean the dust and crud out of the older machine. The air flow through that older machine is probably badly blocked.

Drag factor is a measurement made by the monitor it's not directly related to damper lever position.
But Dougie, he specifically said that it was at the same drag factor - not the same damper lever position.

Bob S.
Then it's all in his head. The machines are identical apart from the paint job.

User avatar
Yankeerunner
10k Poster
Posts: 1193
Joined: March 16th, 2006, 12:17 pm
Location: West Newbury, MA
Contact:

Re: Resistance on new black model D

Post by Yankeerunner » January 28th, 2013, 6:09 pm

Citroen wrote:
Bob S. wrote:
Citroen wrote:Clean the dust and crud out of the older machine. The air flow through that older machine is probably badly blocked.

Drag factor is a measurement made by the monitor it's not directly related to damper lever position.
But Dougie, he specifically said that it was at the same drag factor - not the same damper lever position.

Bob S.
Then it's all in his head. The machines are identical apart from the paint job.
I disagree (knowing full well that I usually am proved wrong when I disagree with Dougie :lol: ). I've always felt that the new machines at CRASH-Bs are harder on the drive than my own, and other, older machines at the same drag factor. My best guess is that things like the bungees or whatever are tighter coming out of the factory than after they are broken in. Even though the drag factor as measured by the deceleration of the flywheel is the same, the effort to get the fly wheel spinning seems harder. At least for a weakling like me. Others, Tom Rawls for one, feel that the new machines only feel smoother to him and not harder.

Last week at my own race I had three nearly new machines to use for the racing and Carla Stein (Seat5) independently said the same thing about being harder to drive (she has an old Model C, I have a 9-year-old Model D).
55-59: 1:33.5 3:19.2 6:55.7 18:22.0 2:47:26.5
60-64: 1:35.9 3:23.8 7:06.7 18:40.8 2:48:53.6
65-69: 1:38.6 3:31.9 7:19.2 19:26.6 3:02:06.0
70-74: 1:40.2 3:33.4 7:32.6 19:50.5 3:06:36.8
75-76: 1:43.9 3:47.7 7:50.2 20:51.3 3:13:55.7

cootngeezer
Paddler
Posts: 2
Joined: February 2nd, 2013, 7:57 am

Re: Resistance on new black model D

Post by cootngeezer » February 2nd, 2013, 8:22 am

My new model D was very hard to pull the first 5 or six pulls. I though that was caused by the new bungees getting stretched. It too is harder to pull than an old model C that I was using at a gym and the return force is for sure a lot greater on my new model D. I guessed the old model C just needs a tune-up.

kayakr
1k Poster
Posts: 133
Joined: January 26th, 2012, 12:26 pm

Re: Resistance on new black model D

Post by kayakr » February 2nd, 2013, 9:50 am

Can someone confirm or deny that the model C and D have identical flywheel weights and moments of inertia?
I use a model C at a gym and D at home.
The gym model seems to have a lighter flywheel but maybe I'm mistaken.

The gym model C does have more broken in bungies and the damper also walks itself to a lighter setting over time.

User avatar
Ergmeister
1k Poster
Posts: 122
Joined: February 28th, 2012, 9:59 am
Location: Sheldonville, MA
Contact:

Re: Resistance on new black model D

Post by Ergmeister » February 2nd, 2013, 4:28 pm

kayakr wrote:Can someone confirm or deny that the model C and D have identical flywheel weights and moments of inertia?
I use a model C at a gym and D at home. The gym model seems to have a lighter flywheel but maybe I'm mistaken. The gym model C does have more broken in bungies and the damper also walks itself to a lighter setting over time.
I happened to be rebuilding an older Model C today so I weighed the flywheel at 9.4 lbs. This will likely vary some from C to C as these flywheels are usually balanced by drilling 1/2" holes in the perimeter, so some will have more than others, but that's a starting point. I expect when I pull a D apart it will weigh more but I don't know what that equates to as far as inertial pull differences if anything. But the older C flywheel I just weighed twice on different scales was 9.4 pounds.
Citroen wrote:Clean the dust and crud out of the older machine. The air flow through that older machine is probably badly blocked. Drag factor is a measurement made by the monitor it's not directly related to damper lever position.
Correct. Worn or stretched bungees and dust are main culprit of this.

Dust in the machine is generally counter-intuitive to most people's thinking; dust makes the machine easier to row, so the dust in the older machine will have a much lower drag factor than a new machine at the same damper setting. I've seen dust plugged rowers that couldn't get the drag factor to 100 with the damper slammed to 10. Drag factor is generally a reliable number irrespective of the damper setting from rower to rower.

If this is truly as stated, perhaps updating firmware, and proper cleaning and maintenance of the rowers showing the differences will level the field for you.

I frequently hear from owners that after I do a full rebuild on their rowers, they lower their damper 50% or more to get the same drag factor as before.

Bob S.
Marathon Poster
Posts: 5142
Joined: March 16th, 2006, 12:00 pm

Re: Resistance on new black model D

Post by Bob S. » February 2nd, 2013, 4:51 pm

Ergmeister wrote:
Dust in the machine is generally counter-intuitive to most people's thinking; dust makes the machine easier to row, so the dust in the older machine will have a much lower drag factor than a new machine at the same damper setting.
There was one odd exception to that on this forum (or maybe the UK forum?) not long ago. A really clogged up erg was reported as giving very strange results, like having an extremely high drag (and feel), which would suddenly drop to a very low level. It all cleared up on cleaning. It was never completely spelled out, but I am convinced that the dirt build-up was so great that it was actually contacting the wheel creating the very high drag due to friction. A few spins of the wheel would knock some dirt loose and the wheel could turn freely again, with only air left to provide drag - which was very low because of the clogged cage.

Bob S.

User avatar
Atorrante
1k Poster
Posts: 194
Joined: December 18th, 2006, 10:06 pm

Re: Resistance on new black model D

Post by Atorrante » February 20th, 2013, 9:40 pm

I have a new black D since November. It roughly had half million meters logged in, so it's breaked, and I find it harder than my 8 y.o. D, and I'm actually slower in it.
54 years young, 5'7"
2K pb 7:05

rowbike
500m Poster
Posts: 76
Joined: December 19th, 2012, 7:59 pm

Re: Resistance on new black model D

Post by rowbike » February 21st, 2013, 4:17 pm

The black model D I bought in December with about 300k on it so far is noticably harder than the two six year old model D's I use at the gym, and I can see significant differences in my times. But my black one has a better, more substantial "feel" when rowing, beyond the fact it is new, if that makes any sense.

User avatar
c2jonw
6k Poster
Posts: 726
Joined: April 3rd, 2006, 1:08 pm

Re: Resistance on new black model D

Post by c2jonw » February 21st, 2013, 4:27 pm

Can someone confirm or deny that the model C and D have identical flywheel weights and moments of inertia?
The flywheel moment of inertia (which is the important value, not weight) is the same for the models B, C, D, E, Skierg and Dynamic. Differences in feel between various machines at the same drag factor are anecdotal but may be attributal to how well the chain is lubricated, bungee tension and overall smoothness of the machine. Then there's always pre-race jitters.....C2JonW
73 year old grandpa living in Waterbury Center, Vermont, USA
Concept2 employee 1980-2018! and what a long, strange trip it's been......

User avatar
Atorrante
1k Poster
Posts: 194
Joined: December 18th, 2006, 10:06 pm

Re: Resistance on new black model D

Post by Atorrante » February 22nd, 2013, 9:16 pm

So in a machine with an over tensed bungee one actually can be wasting energy while rowing and be slower? While an under tensed bungee is easy to diagnose, how can be tested the bungee not to be over tensed?
54 years young, 5'7"
2K pb 7:05

User avatar
c2jonw
6k Poster
Posts: 726
Joined: April 3rd, 2006, 1:08 pm

Re: Resistance on new black model D

Post by c2jonw » February 25th, 2013, 4:21 pm

So in a machine with an over tensed bungee one actually can be wasting energy while rowing and be slower? While an under tensed bungee is easy to diagnose, how can be tested the bungee not to be over tensed?
As long as the bungee cord is in the normal range of tightness (6-8 pounds at the catch) there's not going to be a significant score difference between machines. Testing has confirmed this, and it is our conclusion that at normal tensions the majority of the energy that you put into the cord to stretch it is returned to you in helping you back up to the catch. Of course at much higher tensions there will be noticeable changes in the feel and in the energy needed. C2JonW
73 year old grandpa living in Waterbury Center, Vermont, USA
Concept2 employee 1980-2018! and what a long, strange trip it's been......

User avatar
Atorrante
1k Poster
Posts: 194
Joined: December 18th, 2006, 10:06 pm

Re: Resistance on new black model D

Post by Atorrante » February 25th, 2013, 8:13 pm

Thanks Jon to clear this. For now I will assume my new black D has an extremely tensed bungee not to be ashamed with the otherwise poor performance in the last few months.
54 years young, 5'7"
2K pb 7:05

Post Reply