Would you change your E model for a D
Would you change your E model for a D
Hi folks
I’m about to purchase my first ergo and would appreciate your input before I make a decision between the D or E model.
Firstly, has anyone any regrets on purchasing an E model, now wishing they had chosen the D model & if so why?
Whichever I choose will have the PM4.
I am swayed to the D because:
Most gyms use the D model.
If I travel to a competition they use D models.
It is tried and tested.
I see the D model discussed much more in the forums.
It is easier to store.
The E model is appears to be aimed more at the home user.
I am swayed to the E model because:
It is new.
It is higher of the floor.
Any comments would be much appreciated.
I’m about to purchase my first ergo and would appreciate your input before I make a decision between the D or E model.
Firstly, has anyone any regrets on purchasing an E model, now wishing they had chosen the D model & if so why?
Whichever I choose will have the PM4.
I am swayed to the D because:
Most gyms use the D model.
If I travel to a competition they use D models.
It is tried and tested.
I see the D model discussed much more in the forums.
It is easier to store.
The E model is appears to be aimed more at the home user.
I am swayed to the E model because:
It is new.
It is higher of the floor.
Any comments would be much appreciated.
- PaulS
- 10k Poster
- Posts: 1212
- Joined: March 16th, 2006, 12:07 pm
- Location: Washington State, USA
- Contact:
No regrets at all, after replacing one of my model D's with an E, we liked the change enough to also replace the other. I'm imagining that these will be in use for a very long time before any changes are made.
I think a 4 inch height difference would have been enough, and it also would have kept the seating height under the "chair height" even when the Erg is on Slides, which on the current model makes the seat quite high for people under avg height. IOW, if you are short or have short legs, it is a bit tougher to "mount up" on the E, but so is sitting in normal height chairs so maybe it's something you get used to dealing with.
I think a 4 inch height difference would have been enough, and it also would have kept the seating height under the "chair height" even when the Erg is on Slides, which on the current model makes the seat quite high for people under avg height. IOW, if you are short or have short legs, it is a bit tougher to "mount up" on the E, but so is sitting in normal height chairs so maybe it's something you get used to dealing with.
Erg on,
Paul Smith
www.ps-sport.net Your source for Useful Rowing Accessories and Training Assistance.
"If you don't want to know the answer, don't ask me the question."
Paul Smith
www.ps-sport.net Your source for Useful Rowing Accessories and Training Assistance.
"If you don't want to know the answer, don't ask me the question."
Hi norr...
I assume you've looked at the page where C compares the two? Note that there is a pdf chart w/ more details that can be downloaded from that page.
The only thing on your lists that I'd disagree with is the statement that the E was intended for the home user market. I think it was actually intended for the institutional market (for example, monitor that doesn't adjust for height, but isn't as subject to damage), height, etc.
Best wishes on your new erg.
Alissa
I assume you've looked at the page where C compares the two? Note that there is a pdf chart w/ more details that can be downloaded from that page.
The only thing on your lists that I'd disagree with is the statement that the E was intended for the home user market. I think it was actually intended for the institutional market (for example, monitor that doesn't adjust for height, but isn't as subject to damage), height, etc.
Best wishes on your new erg.
Alissa
Alissa,Alissa wrote:Hi norr...
The only thing on your lists that I'd disagree with is the statement that the E was intended for the home user market. I think it was actually intended for the institutional market (for example, monitor that doesn't adjust for height, but isn't as subject to damage), height, etc.
Alissa
I had assumed that it was a typo, i.e. that it was intended to be D, based on context.
Bob S.
Hi Bob,Bob S. wrote:Alissa,Alissa wrote:Hi norr...
The only thing on your lists that I'd disagree with is the statement that the E was intended for the home user market. I think it was actually intended for the institutional market (for example, monitor that doesn't adjust for height, but isn't as subject to damage), height, etc.
Alissa
I had assumed that it was a typo, i.e. that it was intended to be D, based on context.
Bob S.
That's interesting...looking back I can see how you could reach that conclusion.
I reached the contrary one looking at the items in the "I am swayed to the D because" list. Since the first item was "Most gyms use the D model", it seemed to me that having the last item "The E model [] appears to be more aimed at the home user" was consistent with a writer who prefers "gym quality" gear. So I didn't even consider a typo.
Hmmmm...I guess I'll just have to wonder!

Alissa
Hi folks
Thanks for taking the time to reply. I appreciate it.
To clarify:
I do prefer gym quality gear and simply wondered if the E model is going to gradually replace the D models in the commercial gyms eventually phasing out the D model completely. Or will there now always be 2 models available?
If you were to purchase again which would you choose E or D?
Thanks again.
Thanks for taking the time to reply. I appreciate it.
To clarify:

I do prefer gym quality gear and simply wondered if the E model is going to gradually replace the D models in the commercial gyms eventually phasing out the D model completely. Or will there now always be 2 models available?
If you were to purchase again which would you choose E or D?
Thanks again.
Ronnie G.