Newbie advice 32 Male 203lbs 5ft11

Maintenance, accessories, operation. Anything to do with making your erg work.
Post Reply
Dimeech
Paddler
Posts: 3
Joined: October 17th, 2024, 10:02 pm

Newbie advice 32 Male 203lbs 5ft11

Post by Dimeech » April 5th, 2025, 7:32 am

Hey guys, first time posting in the forums. But I have been reading much since I started rowing almost 7 months ago. Might sound too excessive but I love rowing. It’s the one exercise I can relax mentally and still get a good workout and breathe better after. After reading the forms and following RowAlong videos, I realized form is a priority.

I’ve worked my way up to trying to do 10K steady state. BUT! From what I’ve been reading and seeing on average stats, my pace is too low for my height and weight. I know you guys don’t see my form, but can my form really affect my pace?

Recent 10K stats:
18 SPM
AVG PACE: 2.22
AVG power: 121 watts
Drag factor 104

I know drag factor is low but I am doing this to slowly ease into proper rowing form. I am risk averse and would love to continue rowing for a long time.

My goals are to going to longer distances and to maximize proper form and efficiency in rowing that will not get me into injury trouble. At the end of the day pace doesn’t matter too much for me because I just like to row. I’m just trying to see if I am just really weak or is my pace like this due to improper form (again I know you all haven’t seen my form).

Any advice? Anyone else in the same boat as me?

iain
10k Poster
Posts: 1308
Joined: October 11th, 2007, 6:56 am
Location: Reading, UK

Re: Newbie advice 32 Male 203lbs 5ft11

Post by iain » April 8th, 2025, 8:59 am

Firstly 104DF is not exceptionally low, I have heard it said that Rob Waddell used a DF of 90 when setting the world 2k record.

In addition, there are many people much slower than you. In a couple of years rowing 5 days a week in a gym, I estimate that less than 10% of the people rowing next to me were rowing this fast and few did more than 5mins! Congratulations on completing your first 10k. THe majority of people couldn't complete this at anything like the pace that you managed!

This forum is full of exceptionally fit people and you cannot take their performances as "normal". I have rowed over 25,000,000M, am the same height (if a lightweight) and do most of my rowing at about that pace. You are rowing at a relatively low rating (18 strokes per min) that will explain much of the difference. This is fine for training, but for an all out time trial most people on here would use 24-28 SpM. One stat that may be useful if the "Work per Stroke". This is Watts/strokes. so 122/18 = 6.8WMin (or in a more recognisable unit, 407J per stroke. We see many new rowers initially rowing at less than 5WMin.

That said, when fit and strong most heavyweights of your age can manage to maintain a stronger stroke than this. Form could definitely make the difference and a significant proportion of the force created can not be transferred to the handle if you are taking the catch with bent arms or with the chain not in line with your arms (as the initial force will go on rectifying this rather than accelerating the flywheel - the only thing measured by the PM. SImilar if the initial leg drive is used to pull you over (taking catch with rounded back to "shoot the slide" where the seat is driven back more than the chain is pulled) amongst others.

However I suspect that the difference is more likely to a greater degree be because of the difference in the force profile of rowing to many other sports. typically a drive (the only part that contributes to the PM performance)is 0.6-0.7S, so in a minute you are likely to be "doing useful work" for 10-13S per minute (multiplying by the 18 strokes). Running, canoeing, swimming and particularly cycling would have the force applied for a much higher proportion of the time. As a result when rowing to generate high outputs requires us to drive with much higher forces than used in these other sports. So the action is one of a high force action followed by a slow recovery so that we can complete another drive. The drive has often been described as like a horizontal deadlift all be it repeated over 850 times. So over time you may well be able to build up the amount of work per stroke by driving faster. Alternatively when fitter, you should be able to maintain a higher rating without significantly reducing the work per stroke. That work per stroke at 24SpM would yield 163W which is 2:09 pace.

Well done on a great start.
56, lightweight in pace and by gravity. Currently training 3-4 times a week after a break to slowly regain the pitiful fitness I achieved a few years ago. Free Spirit, come join us http://www.freespiritsrowing.com/forum/

jamesg
Marathon Poster
Posts: 4254
Joined: March 18th, 2006, 3:44 am
Location: Trentino Italy

Re: Newbie advice 32 Male 203lbs 5ft11

Post by jamesg » April 9th, 2025, 3:05 am

can my form really affect my pace?
If by "form" you mean technique, certainly. Any value of Pace implies a certain amount of Power. And Power on the erg is the product of three numbers: average handle force; length of stroke; and rating (strokes per minute).

The usual procedure is to learn to pull a full length stroke, at low ratings, on low drag. Then use that stroke at increasing force, to get fit. If then we want to race, we use it at increasing ratings too.

At height 5'11 (1.8m) you have a fit weight of around 23*1.8² = 75kg; so are already working at 122/75 = 1.6Wkg. Not bad at all. 2W/kg would be better.

At rating 18, 122W/18 = 6.8 W-min per stroke; can be improved.
08-1940, 179cm, 75kg post-op (3 bp).

Dave Neve
500m Poster
Posts: 51
Joined: August 29th, 2024, 5:07 pm

Re: Newbie advice 32 Male 203lbs 5ft11

Post by Dave Neve » April 10th, 2025, 1:56 pm

Hello

Very hard to comment on someone's form when we can't see you and you don't have a video.

But don't give up. Rome was not built in a day.
DOB: 08/12/1958
Weight: Around 87 kg
Regular gym goer
Best distance ever: 7601m in 30 min, 10,000 m in 42m15s
Ex-squash player and regular cyclist on all terrain bike

Dangerscouse
Marathon Poster
Posts: 10989
Joined: April 27th, 2014, 11:11 am
Location: Liverpool, England

Re: Newbie advice 32 Male 203lbs 5ft11

Post by Dangerscouse » April 12th, 2025, 1:25 pm

Welcome to the forum. I've got a few queries.

- How are you setting your steady state pace? It can be a simple mistake that you end up going a bit slower than you could do, as you judge it as being too hard. Rowing is hard, so it's a question of degrees, and I wonder if your comment about being risk averse is also holding you back.

- Have you tried rowing at higher than r18? You might be better suited to r22-r24.

- Are you just doing 10k at a similar pace every time? To quote Einstein, "if you always do what you've always done, you'll always get what you've always got". You need to push the effort fairly regularly to make more progress on the slower sessions.

- Form definitely can affect pace. You could easily be leaking power through poor transference of power, gripping the handle too hard or not being relaxed enough, to name just three possible issues.
51 HWT; 6' 4"; 1k= 3:09; 2k= 6:36; 5k= 17:19; 6k= 20:47; 10k= 35:46 30mins= 8,488m 60mins= 16,618m HM= 1:16.47; FM= 2:40:41; 50k= 3:16:09; 100k= 7:52:44; 12hrs = 153km

"You reap what you row"

Instagram: stuwenman

MPx
10k Poster
Posts: 1397
Joined: October 30th, 2016, 1:38 pm
Location: Somerset, UK

Re: Newbie advice 32 Male 203lbs 5ft11

Post by MPx » April 12th, 2025, 6:07 pm

Dimeech wrote:
April 5th, 2025, 7:32 am
I’ve worked my way up to trying to do 10K steady state. BUT! From what I’ve been reading and seeing on average stats, my pace is too low for my height and weight. I know you guys don’t see my form, but can my form really affect my pace?

Recent 10K stats:
18 SPM
AVG PACE: 2.22
AVG power: 121 watts
Drag factor 104
There may be some confusion in terminology and comparisons going on here. "worked [your] way up to 10k Steady State" is a very good effort - doing 10k continuous is a long way for people like me (albeit just a warm up for several people on here). But is it really "Steady State" which is a term for a manageable training pace that you adopt on the less hard sessions or is it in fact the best you can do - effectively a Time Trial? If 2:22 is steady state pace, you might expect to be able to do a 10k TT @ say 2:15 or better. There's roughly a 9 or 10s pace difference between my 10k SS and TT. If you're comparing to the rankings, they will (nearly) all be the season best Time Trial times - no SS times get ranked.

On your stats:
18spm is low/normal for steady state - I'm typically r20 but others use 18-24. For a TT 10k I'd be closer to r27.
2:22 seems a fair pace for Steady State - your HR may well drift up as its such a long session but if you're basically staying below your nominal UT1 HR cap then it counts as steady state. If you don't monitor Heart Rate then RPE needs to be about a 7 or less.
DF 104 is indeed low - and I wonder if you've chosen it due to misunderstanding the concept of Drag? If you're concerned about it being "resistence" that you want to minimise to save your back or similar then that's not really what its about. You could put DF up to 220 and as long as you did a slow enough stroke it would actually feel the same resistence as a normal (very fast!) stroke at 104. There's nothing at all wrong with DF 104 if you've naturally got a very fast leg drive. If you haven't, then you may well find it easier (yes really!) to generate the same pace at a higher DF. Most people, most of the time, find a sweet spot for themselves in the 110-130 range - but equally there's very many outliers like me that prefer it even higher, or who prefer lower like you use.

As for advice...I always advocate doing a mix of sessions rather than the same thing every time. You learn a lot more about yourself (and the erg) more quickly, by mixing it up a bit. But if your goal is just to get reasonably fit then you'll do that just by sticking with it - so do whatever you find most enjoyable.
Mike - 67 HWT 183

Image

Post Reply